• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05 Roush *6 PICS ALL SIDES*

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgtfirormsg
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

sgtfirormsg

New Member
Aug 3, 2003
123
0
0
Ontario/Michigan
Oct 26, 2004
#1
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #1
Here ya go...

http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05front.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rearside.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05frontfull.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rearsideqt.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rear.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05side.jpg
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Oct 26, 2004
#2
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #2
It really looks sweet except the side profile showing the front clip just doesn't look right. The shape of the front is messed up.

kirkyg
 
I

ice1874193

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
32
0
0
Oct 26, 2004
#3
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #3
what are those black inserts in the bumper?
 

sveet

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
703
0
0
Snow Belt!
Oct 26, 2004
#4
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #4
My opinion:

Over All Rating : Decent, but leaves me a bit disappointed.

Bad:
1. Scoops on rar windows are excessive.
2. Pockets in rear bumper look like something I would put my sunglasses in.
3. Rectangular exhaust way too Pontiac / GM. Keep em round!
4. Painted grille probably really fragile to stone, etc. damage.
5. I was hoping for some side scoops.

Good:
1. Front chin spoiler looks really good.
2. Rear Spoiler loos good.
3. Wheels / Tire / Brakes are very nice.

Just my $.02 worth.
 
A

alan64

Banned
Oct 22, 2004
48
0
0
Oct 26, 2004
#5
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #5
can you say lousy,,, six times??

really bad,,,, bad, bad, bad,, bad, bad
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Oct 26, 2004
#6
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #6
Yikes, that's really nasty. A perfect example of what not to do with the new Mustang...
 

Mr_dcj2001

Member
Sep 8, 2004
355
0
16
California
Oct 26, 2004
#7
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #7
sveet said:
My opinion:

Over All Rating : Decent, but leaves me a bit disappointed.

Bad:
1. Scoops on rar windows are excessive.
2. Pockets in rear bumper look like something I would put my sunglasses in.
3. Rectangular exhaust way too Pontiac / GM. Keep em round!
4. Painted grille probably really fragile to stone, etc. damage.
5. I was hoping for some side scoops.

Good:
1. Front chin spoiler looks really good.
2. Rear Spoiler loos good.
3. Wheels / Tire / Brakes are very nice.

Just my $.02 worth.
Click to expand...
I agree. The red crap in the grill and the headlights has to go. I think you have to have black in there to accent a Red roush right. Just too much red. The hood scoop? .
 

2013 Geee T

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
805
5
19
Oak Park, CA
Oct 26, 2004
#8
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #8
Looks like someone went to the "dress up" isle at Pep Boys.
 

Ron9

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
28
0
0
Oct 26, 2004
#9
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #9
Thanks for the pics.
 
T

tarch

My 8V > 4V > 2V
Founding Member
Aug 20, 2002
3,073
1
56
Redmond, WA
Oct 26, 2004
#10
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #10
i kinda dislike the fact that it has a saleen s281 spoiler on its butt
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Oct 27, 2004
#11
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #11
To put it simply... Damn, that car is UGLY!

Jason
 

MetikalSVT

New Member
Oct 19, 2004
16
0
0
Bay Area
Oct 27, 2004
#12
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #12
To me it looks like a ricer body kit that you would buy out of a Honda "Tuning" its to pronounced and it doesnt look like it was mounted properly its as if its missing a few nuts and bolts and its just hanging there,
The exhaust is ok but it does look a little to GM. I do like the wind and the hood scoop to an extent

Not the best, they better have somthing amzing under the hood(Not likely)
 

markham51

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
71
0
0
Wilmington, NC, Waterloo, On
Oct 27, 2004
#13
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #13
I like it better on the second look. No doubt I would have to see it in person. Pics can be somewhat misleading. It reminds me of all the posts people were making about how ugly the last gen of Mustang was until they saw it in person and got used to the styling. It looks like Roush has "Saleened" the car. If you look at recent Saleens you see many of the same cues/ideas with lots of dress ups. On the first look it looks overdone, but on the second look...I think I might be able to live with it... particularly if Roush does a decent job on the engine.
 

raindamier

New Member
Sep 28, 2003
6
0
0
Orlando, Fl.
Oct 27, 2004
#14
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #14
I love the new body style, but I think Roush went a bit overboard with theirs. In all its a beautyful car but it could use some remodeling.
 

232_slowness

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
74
0
0
Barksdale AFB
Oct 27, 2004
#15
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #15
hmmm... it looks like a riced out version of a 05 Mustang GT if you ask me, but I like that Roush is at least expanding their ideas. Hopefully they'll pass by more pictures and ideas to the Stang Family and get some ideas from us, get er done.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Oct 27, 2004
#16
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #16
Atleast it looks better than the clay.
 
F

feelthebreak

New Member
Aug 8, 2004
15
0
0
Georgia
Oct 27, 2004
#17
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #17
that just doesn`t look right.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Oct 27, 2004
#18
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #18
Not a fan of the front end. The rest I could probably live with. Except for Roush parts being too expensive.
 

Reimann

Puss > me
Jun 16, 2003
2
3
59
Wherever I May Roam
Oct 27, 2004
#19
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #19
Mustang with retro styling + Honda Civic body kit =
 

admdavs

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
369
0
0
Chicago
Oct 27, 2004
#20
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #20
It isn't all bad- I mean I have seen much worse- but it surely makes me appreciate my sn-95 Roush a great deal more!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Fuel Replacing the Plastic Factory Fuel Line Push on Connectors
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 16, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
27K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2023
rednotch
0
05 gt brake upgrade to '11 brembo HELP !!
  • 05saleen63
  • May 7, 2019
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 14, 2019
Dino Dino Bambino
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?