• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05 Roush *6 PICS ALL SIDES*

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgtfirormsg
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Oct 27, 2004
#21
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #21
Poor Mustang. That's sad...

That said, they will probably sell like hotcakes.
 
R

RICKS

New Member
Jun 5, 2003
580
0
0
Ocala, FL
Oct 27, 2004
#22
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #22
I'm thumbs-down on it, on alot of levels. The front end looks like a fat lower lip, looks like it angles and sticks upward out of square with the rest of the nose and car, and doesn't in any way integrate with the rest of the car down the sides. It's too damn much "bulk", just like I feel that the SN-95 Roush's were too nose-chunky (just my opinion, no offense intended). The hood scoop? Flat-out cheeseball. A scoop works on the 99-04 because of the recess in the hood. Here, it looks no better than a pep-boys scoop bonded to a jacked-up '87 Camaro. The wheels are sharp, but they're overpowered by all the excessive body gee-gawing going on. The C-pillar louvers look straight out of the J.C. Whitney catalog in design, and attachment. The exhaust treatment is VERY slick, but that lower "bulge" that wraps around the tail of the car ruins it, and just makes the car, again, look chunky and clunky. The spoiler? It's alright, but again, a little over-the-top. In short, they tried too damn hard, went way over the top where you have SO much going on to make it look aggressive, it just looks flakey instead. My best analogy is that they should have aimed for the image of The Rock, but they got carried away and wound up with some amalgumation between Randy Savage and Nature Boy Rick Flare.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Oct 27, 2004
#23
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #23
Good

1. Rear wing is ok
2. Side moulding below doors is acceptable
3. Exhaust looks good
4. Painted mirrors
5. Wheels are ok

Bad
1. Giant redneck tacked on hood scoop looks like something you would see on a 1977 camaro in a trailer park
2. Front air damn/ bumper cover is straight out of an APC ricer catalogue
3. Whats up with the cutouts that are in the bumper (extra glove boxes?) They look filled in so Im not sure of the funtionality.

Not sure
1. Quarter window louvers
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Oct 27, 2004
#24
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #24
On the plus side. If you are ever tired and need a place to sit, it looks like the front bumper could double as a bench.

 

Rampant

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
140
0
0
SoCal
Oct 27, 2004
#25
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #25
RICKS said:
In short, they tried too damn hard, went way over the top where you have SO much going on to make it look aggressive, it just looks flakey instead.
Click to expand...
Best description I have heard yet. I couldn't agree more.
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Oct 27, 2004
#26
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #26
Like the rear, and ducktale spoiler, front though...just seems to have to many vents for my taste...and Red..well I never buy red cars anyway..
 
J

Jpjr

New Member
Aug 5, 2004
142
0
0
Oct 27, 2004
#27
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #27
manicmustangman said:
Mustang with retro styling + Honda Civic body kit =
Click to expand...

EXACTLY. Why are they trying to wedge a retro car??
 

Solid HoRNZ

New Member
May 11, 2004
133
0
0
Montreal, QC
Oct 27, 2004
#28
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #28
damn, nice exhaust tips
 
2

2112

New Member
Sep 29, 2004
34
0
0
Oct 27, 2004
#29
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #29
AWESOME!! I love it
 

aete2

Founding Member
Nov 23, 2001
554
3
19
Oct 27, 2004
#30
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #30
i don't mind it, somethings NEED to be changed but in the first year you have to expect that- as the years go on it will get better.
 
C

CJ-95GT

New Member
Apr 24, 2003
13
0
0
DFW, TX
Oct 27, 2004
#31
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #31
Looks dam fine too me! The only thing I would change is the grill and maybe the rims. I think it looks a lot better than the stock GT and Saleen look. Unfortunately, it will probably have a Saleen price...
 
W

wrx-no-mo

New Member
Jun 6, 2004
41
0
0
Oct 27, 2004
#32
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #32
Can someone photoshop a picture of a laughing person pointing at it so we can post it on www.laughatrice.com.

That is just terrible.
 

Mr_dcj2001

Member
Sep 8, 2004
355
0
16
California
Oct 27, 2004
#33
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #33
I think we can agree it looks better than the drawings(by just a little)?
 

Stangnut

Member
Mar 24, 2003
483
0
16
Dothan, AL
Oct 27, 2004
#34
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #34
Come on, the is a HIGH dollar car.
We're trying to find some little thing we like about it and find "acceptable".
Instead we should be looking at it and saying "WOW! That car is Bad A--!"
Get with it Roush! Get a clue!

Jason
 
E

Eduk8r

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
19
0
0
Chicago
Oct 27, 2004
#35
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #35
To much, too much, too much. Simplify, man. If I wanted my car too look like that I'd by a 300zx and be done with it. I could see using one or maybe two of the pieces (I like the window louvers) but the whole package together is garish.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Oct 27, 2004
#36
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #36
Yeh Rousch, do less work, put less on the car, make more money. It's what these people want. Personally I think it's ok, probably a bit much for my likings, but the simplified photochop in the other thread made it look even sweeter.
 
C

calypsocoral302

New Member
Jul 2, 2004
64
0
0
Philadelphia, PA
Oct 28, 2004
#37
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #37
sgtfirormsg said:
Here ya go...

http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05front.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rearside.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05frontfull.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rearsideqt.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05rear.jpg
http://www.goroush.com/images/2005/05side.jpg
Click to expand...

While I feel obligated to stand to be counted with the majority in that this thing looks too "ricey" for my taste, there is some good to be seen in this...

...Ricers now have incentive to buy and mod a REAL car.

Any chance that hood scoop is functional?

Maybe it is a bit much for those of us who have watched the development of the 05 since Day 1. But, for people who normally wouldn't even look at a domestic, especially Generation Y, I believe the Roush will definitely have some appeal to the tuner crowd. And, yeah, while the design is too "busy" for most of us, I am grateful that it is still relatively coherent... unlike some body kits I've seen for Civics, Integras, and Celicas... ESPECIALLY Celicas...
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Oct 28, 2004
#38
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #38
Hey hey don't be knocking the Celicas too hard. Ok the new ones suck, but leave the (since last month) classics alone.

http://www.geocities.com/KingBEEST/Celica.html
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Oct 28, 2004
#39
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #39
IMO looks pretty good, just needs a few less red accents. The body being a total throw from the norm, then adding a roush redo...obviously
1+1=drastic
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
260
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Fuel Replacing the Plastic Factory Fuel Line Push on Connectors
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 16, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
27K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2023
rednotch
0
05 gt brake upgrade to '11 brembo HELP !!
  • 05saleen63
  • May 7, 2019
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 14, 2019
Dino Dino Bambino
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?