• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

10:1 vs. 11:1 Compression: Power Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90mustangGT
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2005

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 17, 2005
#1
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #1
What would be a ballpark difference between two engines, otherwise the same, but one having a point more compression than the other.

I have not decided on what motor I am going to do, but weather it's a 306 or 347 the compression ratio is an issue. 11:1 may make more power, but staying around 10:1 compression is still mild boost freindly, maby for the future.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 17, 2005
#2
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #2
I'd guess 5-10hp. If your building the engine with the plans for a supercharger I know your smarter than to use a stock block. Theres also diofferent ring gaps needed for boost i believe.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2005
#3
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #3
10:1 is still high for boost. I wouldn't go over 9:1 for boost.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 17, 2005
#4
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #4
Only 5-10hp? That's it? I thought there would be a more than that. Building a motor for a S/C, not exactly but I kind of want to leave that option open. That way if I decide to get a blower, I can at least use it while building another motor.

I am just currious, I really trying not to rack my mind on the motor right now because I am trying to build a workable chassis first to put that motor into.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 17, 2005
#5
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #5
5-10hp was just a guess. Remember, it only costs $80 or so to mill heads so for the few bucks it costs, it helps. I have zero interest in a blower so I went with higher compression.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 17, 2005
#6
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #6
Grn92LX said:
5-10hp was just a guess. Remember, it only costs $80 or so to mill heads so for the few bucks it costs, it helps. I have zero interest in a blower so I went with higher compression.
Click to expand...

I hear you on that one, you got that S trim then decided against it.

I might just go ahead with the current 306 but add Probe pistons that are for the TFS reliefs. They would put me closer to 10.8:1 compression. I'd like to do a 347, but that will cost more, and I already have the 306 shortblock.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 18, 2005
#7
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #7
there is usually around a 20- 25hp gain per point in compression
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 18, 2005
#8
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #8
90mustangGT said:
I hear you on that one, you got that S trim then decided against it.

I might just go ahead with the current 306 but add Probe pistons that are for the TFS reliefs. They would put me closer to 10.8:1 compression. I'd like to do a 347, but that will cost more, and I already have the 306 shortblock.
Click to expand...


Is your block zero deck? Are your tfs heads milled? If not, then you'll end up with around 10:1 or so. My block is zero deck and my heads are 55.6cc (stock TW are 61cc) I also run a .039" gasket (fel pro 1011-2)

Yeah for me, the blower was a mistake. But at least I learned how to install one

Your back and forth on the 306 vs 347 lol. If your keeping it n/a, build the cubes!
 

sodaking663rd

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
47
0
0
annapolis, md
Jul 18, 2005
#9
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #9
Grn92LX said:
5-10hp was just a guess. Remember, it only costs $80 or so to mill heads so for the few bucks it costs, it helps. I have zero interest in a blower so I went with higher compression.
Click to expand...

i'm curious why you don't want a blower...can you explain?
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jul 18, 2005
#10
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #10
I believe the general rule of thumb is 4% per point of compression. This obviously means if you run a blower and/or make more power -- more compression will be worth even more.

I think there was a dyno test in a mag a little while back. It was on a race motor, but it dynoed something like 400hp then they upped the compression four points and it went to like 475hp. They put it under boost under low compression and made 800hp and then upper the compression and made 975hp or so. Numbers were similar to that IIRC.
 

Blk91stang

Member
Jan 3, 2003
607
0
16
North Brunswick, NJ
Jul 19, 2005
#11
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #11
11:1 compression is the MAX I would go on a street car. Anymore might give you reliability problems (see 2nd paragraph). A point more of compression not only add's more hp, it's the best way to make a lot of torque!

Just something to throw in.. I have about 12.7:1 compression on my 85' and I've been through 3 stock starters before dropping $350 on a Mean Green starter to stop them from breaking when cranking. The car also hardly turns over when it's hot... Major pita. Just something to think about..
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 19, 2005
#12
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
Is your block zero deck? Are your tfs heads milled? If not, then you'll end up with around 10:1 or so. My block is zero deck and my heads are 55.6cc (stock TW are 61cc) I also run a .039" gasket (fel pro 1011-2)

Yeah for me, the blower was a mistake. But at least I learned how to install one

Your back and forth on the 306 vs 347 lol. If your keeping it n/a, build the cubes!
Click to expand...

The pistons come up slightly higher than the block deck, not much but I set a cylinder head on top and turned over the motor and the pistons were bumping the head. (no gasket)

The heads have been milled because they are used, but have been machined and the deck surface ground.

306 is cheaper than a 347, but I am tempted. I have a 306 shortblock, but I need different pistons, which will be about $500, then I need to balance it, and have the block re-align honed and such and buy new fasteners. For about $500 more I'll have a rod and crank combo to go along with the pistons with more throw. Since the car probally won't be ready until next spring, I have decided to do the motor last, right now I'm doing the chassis build, this winter I will do all I can to get something mean in that chassis.
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Jul 19, 2005
#13
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #13
What kind of heads are you running 90mustangGT ?
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jul 19, 2005
#14
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #14
try this
http://www.wallaceracing.com/calc-crchg.php
 
J

Jason@AFR

Member
Aug 9, 2004
58
0
6
California
Jul 19, 2005
#15
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #15
89MustangGX said:
I believe the general rule of thumb is 4% per point of compression.
Click to expand...

Agreed
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 19, 2005
#16
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #16
emagdnim said:
What kind of heads are you running 90mustangGT ?
Click to expand...

TFS Twisted Wedge with Track Heat springs.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 19, 2005
#17
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #17
90mustangGT said:
The pistons come up slightly higher than the block deck, not much but I set a cylinder head on top and turned over the motor and the pistons were bumping the head. (no gasket)

The heads have been milled because they are used, but have been machined and the deck surface ground.

306 is cheaper than a 347, but I am tempted. I have a 306 shortblock, but I need different pistons, which will be about $500, then I need to balance it, and have the block re-align honed and such and buy new fasteners. For about $500 more I'll have a rod and crank combo to go along with the pistons with more throw. Since the car probally won't be ready until next spring, I have decided to do the motor last, right now I'm doing the chassis build, this winter I will do all I can to get something mean in that chassis.
Click to expand...

Even with a gasket you'll still hit. So either way you need new pistons, rings and balancing. I would do all new bearings as well while its apart.

How sure are you about your compression? Piston sticking out of the hole + milled TW heads + an aftermarket flat top piston will = over 10:1 I'd say. My block is zero deck. I would stay n/a and build the stroker. It'll be fun and less hassle. If it gets boring, throw an n2o hit on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Raising compression on a relatively stock 302
  • keel
  • Jul 9, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2023
keel
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
485
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?