• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

160* thermostat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adrenalin
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2004
A

Adrenalin

Member
Apr 25, 2004
168
0
16
Central Florida
Jun 1, 2004
#1
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #1
Since it has started getting hotter there have been alot of posts about engine temps. increasing and cars running hot lately.

I have always ran 160* thermostats in my stangs which always ran cool even in Florida and have had no problems with them. (Fox Bodies)

I know there has been the 160* or 180* debate on which you should/could run. Some say the 160* cause problems and some say they don't. I am new to the SN95, and want to go with the 160* thermostat but I am not sure how this computer will react to it. I fear the majority of the responces will be in favor of the 180 but the question I want to know the answer to is this:

Why should I not use a 160* and why would the 180* thermostat be the better choice. Or if I am supprised and hear some say go with the 160* stat, explain why there as well.

Thanks, Adrenalin
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jun 1, 2004
#2
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #2
if you run a 160 your car will always be in cool down mode and will never reach correct opertional temps. Our cars operate the best between 180-200. Mine runs at 190 most of the time and only goes up to 210 when its hot or in slow driving but then the fan kicks and and it dropes back down. Its much better for your car to run a 180 T Stat in it. Run a 180 w/ some water wetter and you should be ok.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 1, 2004
#3
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #3
The computer will be fine with the 160 since it switches to CL at 120 (if I remember correctly) but you want it between 180 and 200 as he said for best performance. I find I'm running best at 190.
 
A

Adrenalin

Member
Apr 25, 2004
168
0
16
Central Florida
Jun 2, 2004
#4
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #4
Thanks for the reply's fellas. I think I will at least try the 160* and see how it runs firsthand. I can always swap to a 180 later if I don't like it. I just didn't want to throw in a 160* then have to redo it again because of a computer problem or something.

Thanks again, Adrenalin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
708
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
882
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Thursday at 11:02 PM
X-cam34
X
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
345
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?