• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

2002 V6 3.8L Help Me

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheIncompetentMechanic
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2026
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#21
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #21
Mustang5L5 said:
Amazon keys sometimes don't program right. Hit or miss on quality of the key. If you start the PATS key programming process, you need to program at least two keys for it to complete. If one Amazon key is junk, and you program only 1 other key, the process gets stuck and you won't be able to program any keys until you get get a 2nd key.

Strattec makes the official licensed keys for Ford. Part number 597602 and roughly $20 or so per key.

The receiver module under the ignition tumbler can sometimes take a dump as well on these cars. Unfortunately harder to find that part. Try the keys and see if a different key is read better by the receiver unit.

As for the odometer not working sometimes. That issue is due to the solder joints on the ribbon that goes between the odometer board and main board. Just need to reflow the connection points and that should fix that issue.
Click to expand...

Vehicle was working smoothly with one key for the past couple days. After gaining security access and trying to program the keys it turned on hard stuck for all keys. I tried doing as much research as possible and from what I’ve seen I have to reset parameters before programming all keys new… it seems now my info for my main key ( taped one ) is no longer reading since my key was forgotten. So now I’m in a loop trying different methods of programming the key. If I can get the main one to work that would be beautiful since it is original. However I have three keys I want to program.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    105.7 KB · Views: 28
  • image.webp
    134.2 KB · Views: 31
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#22
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #22
I’m going to try one Amazon and one original. Complete the process. Then attempt to program the third. I also have fobs I want to program.. but they are from Amazon as well. So if this doesn’t work out right I’ll try that link out. Thankfully the place I work at cuts my keys for free so I don’t have to deal with the scamming lock smiths or dealing with Home Depot/ace telling me no for liability reasons.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#23
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #23
I’ve found a couple transceivers at the junk yard and ripped them out as well.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#24
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #24
But after trying to install those and using them same problem where the key wasn’t being read properly.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#25
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #25
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
I’ve found a couple transceivers at the junk yard and ripped them out as well.
Click to expand...
Along with some other goods
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    416.6 KB · Views: 36
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#26
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #26
After time when the key inserted into the ignition once the theft light flashes. It flashes twice then pauses. This indicates a fault with the door switch? How would this prevent the car from starting is how I’m confused.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 8, 2026
#27
  • Apr 8, 2026
  • #27
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
After time when the key inserted into the ignition once the theft light flashes. It flashes twice then pauses. This indicates a fault with the door switch? How would this prevent the car from starting is how I’m confused.
Click to expand...
After time of course the light turns off completely now but if I remove it and insert it again it shows it won’t start. And repeats the same process.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,237
17,922
224
Massachusetts
Apr 9, 2026
#28
  • Apr 9, 2026
  • #28
That's the problem I've had with aftermarket keys. If one isn't able to connect to the receiver, you won't be able to program any of the keys successful and the vehicle won't start. Granted, it could be an issue on the receiving end, or even an issue elsewhere. But PATS programming only completes properly if two keys program. If only one programs you won't have any functional keys. So that could be what is happening here.

Can you scan the module dtcs? The IC module might show some DTC's that might be a clue here. If there are communication issues with the cluster, those usually show as module DTC's. These cars were the first Mustangs to have some modules, mostly the ABS system and the instrument cluster. Sometimes PATSs issues do show up as DTC's there and that can give a clue.

I've used ForScan to do key program and module initialization on these cars. Should be the same functions as your Autel, but i'm making the assumption it shows the same info as ForScan with regards to programming errors and DTC's.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 10, 2026
#29
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • #29
Mustang5L5 said:
That's the problem I've had with aftermarket keys. If one isn't able to connect to the receiver, you won't be able to program any of the keys successful and the vehicle won't start. Granted, it could be an issue on the receiving end, or even an issue elsewhere. But PATS programming only completes properly if two keys program. If only one programs you won't have any functional keys. So that could be what is happening here.

Can you scan the module dtcs? The IC module might show some DTC's that might be a clue here. If there are communication issues with the cluster, those usually show as module DTC's. These cars were the first Mustangs to have some modules, mostly the ABS system and the instrument cluster. Sometimes PATSs issues do show up as DTC's there and that can give a clue.

I've used ForScan to do key program and module initialization on these cars. Should be the same functions as your Autel, but i'm making the assumption it shows the same info as ForScan with regards to programming errors and DTC's.
Click to expand...
When I get off work today I’ll give it a scan to see if I’m having any trouble codes that are new. You’re saying the autel should be able to program it no problem then, the issue lies within the key itself. I’m going to give it a shot getting a better quality. I mean truthfully it looks the same on the outside. I can’t tell the difference.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 10, 2026
#30
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • #30
These are the keys I bought and this is the scanner I have.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3581.webp
    110.3 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_3582.webp
    79.7 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_3583.webp
    130.2 KB · Views: 32
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 10, 2026
#31
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • #31
I personally assumed because it was a bi directional diagnostic tool, it should program the key no problem.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,237
17,922
224
Massachusetts
Apr 10, 2026
#32
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • #32
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
I personally assumed because it was a bi directional diagnostic tool, it should program the key no problem.
Click to expand...


It's a fair assumption to make, and I would assume the same. I dont think the tool is the problem. I've just never used my bidirectional scan tool i've always used ForScan.

I think it's either keys themselves (or maybe 1 of them at least) or it might be related to the underlying error that was present before. That's why I'm suggesting give the modules and scan and see if any DTC's show.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 12, 2026
#33
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #33
Mustang5L5 said:
It's a fair assumption to make, and I would assume the same. I dont think the tool is the problem. I've just never used my bidirectional scan tool i've always used ForScan.

I think it's either keys themselves (or maybe 1 of them at least) or it might be related to the underlying error that was present before. That's why I'm suggesting give the modules and scan and see if any DTC's show.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    152.9 KB · Views: 26
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 12, 2026
#34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #34
Mustang5L5 said:
It's a fair assumption to make, and I would assume the same. I dont think the tool is the problem. I've just never used my bidirectional scan tool i've always used ForScan.

I think it's either keys themselves (or maybe 1 of them at least) or it might be related to the underlying error that was present before. That's why I'm suggesting give the modules and scan and see if any DTC's show.
Click to expand...
The only reason I can think of vehicle immobilized at the moment is because battery level is too low but I’m currently charging the battery, because I have other codes for voltage too low. I’ll charge it up clear dtc scan again and see what happens
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 12, 2026
#35
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #35
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
The only reason I can think of vehicle immobilized at the moment is because battery level is too low but I’m currently charging the battery, because I have other codes for voltage too low. I’ll charge it up clear dtc scan again and see what happens
Click to expand...
Stored codes.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    187.1 KB · Views: 27
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 12, 2026
#36
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #36
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
Stored codes.
Click to expand...
Also just found these codes after scanning
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    76.3 KB · Views: 27
  • image.webp
    188.2 KB · Views: 30
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 12, 2026
#37
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #37
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
Stored codes.
Click to expand...
I’m trying to see if surely has a function for the PMI to inhale the data of the pcm into the pats so I can get it going since at this point I believe it’s only a programming issue, “user error”. Possibly the result of an incompetent mechanic ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3593.webp
    71.9 KB · Views: 33

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,237
17,922
224
Massachusetts
Apr 12, 2026
#38
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • #38
I want to say I’ve seen that last code when the cluster is not initialized to the ECM. Not 100% sure as I didn’t log the code. That’s when I would do the cluster initialization in ForScan prior to programming the keys.

One of the other codes suggests the pats key isn’t programmed. That would trigger theft mode.

The vehicle is cranking and no start right? Is there any menu option to initialize the insteuctment cluster module? Essentially you are programming the cluster to the ecm.


This one is puzzling. I don’t fully understand what is going on here.
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 13, 2026
#39
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • #39
Mustang5L5 said:
I want to say I’ve seen that last code when the cluster is not initialized to the ECM. Not 100% sure as I didn’t log the code. That’s when I would do the cluster initialization in ForScan prior to programming the keys.

One of the other codes suggests the pats key isn’t programmed. That would trigger theft mode.

The vehicle is cranking and no start right? Is there any menu option to initialize the insteuctment cluster module? Essentially you are programming the cluster to the ecm.


This one is puzzling. I don’t fully understand what is going on here.
Click to expand...
The pats module isn’t initialized with the pcm. Because the handshake isn’t present I’m assuming that’s where communication is lost. Apparently my no directional scanner does not have a relearning possibility. Forscan would be needed here to relearn the, pats to the pcm. This is correct I order some new legs from stratec as well as an OND link/adapter for for scan I’ve never downloaded it on computer before so I’ll see how it goes
 
T

TheIncompetentMechanic

Member
Apr 4, 2026
42
6
18
Florida
Apr 13, 2026
#40
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • #40
TheIncompetentMechanic said:
The pats module isn’t initialized with the pcm. Because the handshake isn’t present I’m assuming that’s where communication is lost. Apparently my no directional scanner does not have a relearning possibility. Forscan would be needed here to relearn the, pats to the pcm. This is correct I order some new legs from stratec as well as an OND link/adapter for for scan I’ve never downloaded it on computer before so I’ll see how it goes
Click to expand...
02 V6 3.8l has stand alone pats so it’s type A securilock if I’m correct meaning it’s outside the instrument cluster. This seems like the simplest one I believe to have as if needed there is a transceiver amplifier if only one key is left.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
65
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
423
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
T
2002 3.8L V6 - My second Mustang
  • Taylortoxicity
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
212
The Welcome Wagon Jan 27, 2026
Warhorse Racing
R
PCM problem
  • Rjchild9
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
172
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
Rjchild9
R
L
1997 V6 Starting issue
  • leanzik04
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
236
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 20, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?