• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

24 lb ijnectors and calibrated maf enough for v3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lxwhite
  • Start date Start date Nov 26, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 28, 2012
#21
  • Nov 28, 2012
  • #21
Gearbanger 101 said:
Yes, assuming you buy the Pro-M meter designated to work with the 42lb/hr injectors, it will work fine. It's still going to be a little rich in the lower regions and throughout the power band though. No combination of injector or MAF meter will be dead on with the stock computer until a proper baseline has been established via ECU tune.
Click to expand...

Troofs with one caveat. With a tune, any Fox compatible injector can be used with any Fox compatible MAF. Mass ir transfer function and injector size are irrelevant where the tune is concerned so long as injector size and maf opening are large enough to support the application.

In other words: I can take a "calibrated" MAF designed for 24s and run any size injector I like with a custom tune.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 28, 2012
#22
  • Nov 28, 2012
  • #22
Noobz347 said:
Troofs with one caveat. With a tune, any Fox compatible injector can be used with any Fox compatible MAF. Mass ir transfer function and injector size are irrelevant where the tune is concerned so long as injector size and maf opening are large enough to support the application.

In other words: I can take a "calibrated" MAF designed for 24s and run any size injector I like with a custom tune.
Click to expand...
If that's the case, what's the point of selling MAF meters calibrated to injector size? If all function is controlled by the ECU, why bother calibrating the meter to the injector at all?

Why could companies like Pro-M for instance promote meters calibrated to spedific injector sizes, when you're just as well off buying any of their meters and having a chip burned for the ECU? I mean...should my car run the same with their meter calibrated to 19lb/hr injectors as it would with one calibrated for 42lb/hr injectors prior to a dyno tune if that's the case?

I understand where a meter that uses sample tubes like C&L to "fool" the computer into making the necessary changes to fuel strategy, but what exactly is the difference between the meters then for a company like say Pro-M if all of the functions are controlled by the ECU ? They don't use a sample tube like C7L, so where are the changes made to the meter that make one differe from another other than the part number?
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Nov 29, 2012
#23
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #23
Gearbanger 101 said:
If that's the case, what's the point of selling MAF meters calibrated to injector size? If all function is controlled by the ECU, why bother calibrating the meter to the injector at all?

Why could companies like Pro-M for instance promote meters calibrated to spedific injector sizes, when you're just as well off buying any of their meters and having a chip burned for the ECU? I mean...should my car run the same with their meter calibrated to 19lb/hr injectors as it would with one calibrated for 42lb/hr injectors prior to a dyno tune if that's the case?

I understand where a meter that uses sample tubes like C&L to "fool" the computer into making the necessary changes to fuel strategy, but what exactly is the difference between the meters then for a company like say Pro-M if all of the functions are controlled by the ECU ? They don't use a sample tube like C7L, so where are the changes made to the meter that make one differe from another other than the part number?
Click to expand...

the pro-m's still "fake" the computer, but theyre calibrated via the electronics vs the sample tube (the c&l's use the ford sensor). as to why use one? cause it works, especially with injectors on the smaller side of the scale (24's, 36's etc) where the startup issues wont be noticed as bad. plus not everyone has a tuner in their area. theres also a cost issue, remember most everyone upgrading a maf is doing it to go to a bigger one, not just to use bigger injectors. a single ~$200 part is a lot easier on the wallet than the $200 part + an hour at the tuner.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 29, 2012
#24
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #24
Chuckman said:
the pro-m's still "fake" the computer, but theyre calibrated via the electronics vs the sample tube (the c&l's use the ford sensor). as to why use one? cause it works, especially with injectors on the smaller side of the scale (24's, 36's etc) where the startup issues wont be noticed as bad. plus not everyone has a tuner in their area. theres also a cost issue, remember most everyone upgrading a maf is doing it to go to a bigger one, not just to use bigger injectors. a single ~$200 part is a lot easier on the wallet than the $200 part + an hour at the tuner.
Click to expand...


BINGO!

What's more is that companies like Pro-M do a much better job of assuring the accuracy (repeatable results) of their meters vs. something that relies on a sample tube.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 29, 2012
#25
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #25
You fellas had me nervous for a minute. The way you made it sound was as though if you didn't have your ECU reprogrammed to match the characteristics of the meter and injectors, you were asking for trouble....when in reality as long as you remain conservative with your choices, the ECU should be able to compensate just fine.

I thought I remembered reading an article from Pro-M where they stated ECU modifications should only be necessary beyond 2-injectors sizes over stock.

I'd hate to think that adding 30lb/hr injectors and corresponding Pro-M MAF meter to my brand new 331 without a corresponding ECU tune, could result in excessively rich operating conditions that might damage the engine?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 29, 2012
#26
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #26
Gearbanger 101 said:
You fellas had me nervous for a minute. The way you made it sound was as though if you didn't have your ECU reprogrammed to match the characteristics of the meter and injectors, you were asking for trouble....when in reality as long as you remain conservative with your choices, the ECU should be able to compensate just fine.

I thought I remembered reading an article from Pro-M where they stated ECU modifications should only be necessary beyond 2-injectors sizes over stock.

I'd hate to think that adding 30lb/hr injectors and corresponding Pro-M MAF meter to my brand new 331 without a corresponding ECU tune, could result in excessively rich operating conditions that might damage the engine?
Click to expand...


2 sizes is about right. Anything over that is hit or miss. You start running into problems with injector cycle minimums, slope, durations, etc.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Nov 29, 2012
#27
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #27
Noobz347 said:
2 sizes is about right. Anything over that is hit or miss. You start running into problems with injector cycle minimums, slope, durations, etc.
Click to expand...
say noobz just curious but what do you do for a living and how did you get so knowledgable on these stangs?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 29, 2012
#28
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #28
90lxwhite said:
say noobz just curious but what do you do for a living and how did you get so knowledgable on these stangs?
Click to expand...

I run a pretty large unit of aircraft maintainers for a living. I've been into mechanics/computers pretty much my entire life. I've gotten the majority of what I know about Stangs from turning wrenches, trial and error, and hanging out with dudes just like you and all the others here.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 29, 2012
#29
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #29
90lxwhite said:
say noobz just curious but what do you do for a living and how did you get so knowledgable on these stangs?
Click to expand...

He started paying attention to my posts.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 29, 2012
#30
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #30
Gearbanger 101 said:
He started paying attention to my posts.
Click to expand...

Yes... in Kanaduh it's lefty-tighty, righty-loosey.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 29, 2012
#31
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #31
Noobz347 said:
Yes... in Kanaduh it's lefty-tighty, righty-loosey.
Click to expand...
Right, and our toilet water swirls in the opposite direction when you flush the toilet. Just like Austrailia.




....and is pumped diretly into various Arkansas drinking reservoirs.
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
205
94
Arkansas
Nov 29, 2012
#32
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #32
Gearbanger 101 said:
Right, and our toilet water swirls in the opposite direction when you flush the toilet. Just like Austrailia.




....and is pumped diretly into various Arkansas drinking reservoirs.
Click to expand...
Well that explains a lot.
 
Reactions: Gearbanger 101

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Nov 29, 2012
#33
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #33
Noobz347 said:
Yes... in Kanaduh it's lefty-tighty, righty-loosey.
Click to expand...
You're Canadian!?!?! Ahh geez I'm a Texan don't ya know
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 29, 2012
#34
  • Nov 29, 2012
  • #34
90lxwhite said:
You're Canadian!?!?! Ahh geez I'm a Texan don't ya know
Click to expand...

No but I been there... I think they had something to do with OB. Backasswards those folks up there.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Nov 30, 2012
#35
  • Nov 30, 2012
  • #35
Noobz347 said:
No but I been there... I think they had something to do with OB. Backasswards those folks up there.
Click to expand...
Ok, one more thing my man. When time it's time to take the crank pulley off for sc kit, I'm gonna need an impact huh??
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,304
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 30, 2012
#36
  • Nov 30, 2012
  • #36
90lxwhite said:
Ok, one more thing my man. When time it's time to take the crank pulley off for sc kit, I'm gonna need an impact huh??
Click to expand...

Yep... unless you want to pull the motor to do it. Even with a spanner wrench and breaker bar, it's tough as hell with it sitting in the bay. A good impact gun with a good air supply, will zip that thing off in no time.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Nov 30, 2012
#37
  • Nov 30, 2012
  • #37
Noobz347 said:
hanging out with dudes
Click to expand...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fuel Vortech Supercharger injectors
  • Dontknowchit
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 8, 2026
from6to8
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
703
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?