• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

3.55 vs. 3.73 Gears

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Doug5.0
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Pushrod

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
173
0
0
KS
Nov 20, 2004
#21
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #21
I have 3.55's and according to that chart I should be going about 99 mph in 5th at 3,000 rpm's. I frequently hit 3,000 rpms in 5th on the interstate and there is no way I am doing 99mph. Do I have different gears in my tranny (original replaced by previous owner) or is my tach way off?
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Nov 20, 2004
#22
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #22
Maybe its me,but i didnt see if it was an aode or a 5spd? I have 4.10's with my aod and get 21mpg on the highway.124 miles round trip to work.
 
9

95Doug5.0

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
6
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#23
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #23
Got FMS 3.73's today on Ebay for $81 plus shipping! Going to have them put in after Thanksgiving. I will post the track times before 3.73's and after. Thanks all for advice!
 

pleasehelp

New Member
Mar 11, 2003
686
0
0
Poplar Grove, Il
Nov 22, 2004
#24
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #24
Were they used or new? Anyway congrats
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 22, 2004
#25
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #25
Congrats on your new gears! Enjoy them
 

Leadsled Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2017
16
0
1
East TN
Apr 27, 2020
#26
  • Apr 27, 2020
  • #26
Unless you’ve got a lightweight aluminum flywheel. Makes a huge difference.

There are many factors in deciding what rear gear ratio to install.

max ultimate HP

Tire size

Fraction time Hwy vs in town

Many factors I’ve missed as well. Fwiw I had 3.55s when I started 30 yrs ago in my ‘86 fox. Ultimately I swapped to 3.73s and found them much better for me.

“It all depends”.....
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,914
10,562
203
polk county florida
Apr 27, 2020
#27
  • Apr 27, 2020
  • #27
Leadsled Coupe said:
Unless you’ve got a lightweight aluminum flywheel. Makes a huge difference.

There are many factors in deciding what rear gear ratio to install.

max ultimate HP

Tire size

Fraction time Hwy vs in town

Many factors I’ve missed as well. Fwiw I had 3.55s when I started 30 yrs ago in my ‘86 fox. Ultimately I swapped to 3.73s and found them much better for me.

“It all depends”.....
Click to expand...
You are talking to ghosts, this thread is from 2004.
 

Leadsled Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2017
16
0
1
East TN
Apr 27, 2020
#28
  • Apr 27, 2020
  • #28
Oh... missed that. I suppose I am more than half way there already! thanks!
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Apr 29, 2020
#29
  • Apr 29, 2020
  • #29
HA! I clicked on this to see if the OP had finally made the switch and was reporting back.
 
Reactions: Adieu

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 29, 2020
#30
  • Apr 29, 2020
  • #30
WhiteCobra95 said:
HA! I clicked on this to see if the OP had finally made the switch and was reporting back.
Click to expand...

Sounds like the average time span of my modifications.

Kurt
 
Reactions: Adieu and General karthief

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Sep 3, 2020
#31
  • Sep 3, 2020
  • #31
Lol talking to ghosts. I actually just googled the topic and it led me here; I know he wasn't referring to me though but still funny. I just had 3.73's put in my 94 cobra after having 3.55's in my modded 95 gt in my avatar. The Gt/saleen definitely had more weight and maybe 3.73's I would have loved overall better for that car. As to this one at first I was like man dang around town and 35 mph ( me going actually maybe 38 sometimes) I don't want to be nearing having to shift into 5th gear lol. I've gotten used to it now though so it's all good. Also to mention I was like with the 3.55's I could play with the exhaust tone a little more as it relates to the rpms and burning more fuel vs the 3.73's and wanting to shift ; playing with the exhaust as in putting my neighbors or the public in AWWW.The 3.55's seemed more perfect to do that and everything was more proportionate in that regard as to the weight of the car with the 18's with huge tires and heavy ass SR race wing, ect. The 3.55 rear end will go in the other 95 which is the twin of the one in the avatar which got rear ended in 2015. That car will get a 351(400).
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,050
21,218
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 3, 2020
#32
  • Sep 3, 2020
  • #32
I've more or less stopped playing with gears. A little fine-tuning one way or another to get cruize speeds in 4th and 5th might be nice.

One thing led to another in the engine bay until I ended up with enough torque and HP in the little Fox that I said, "Uncle" or "Enough" or "I'm going to die soon I should stop". It's a streetcar. It's still sporting the original 2:73s and traction is still a huge issue. LoL

I guess that the moral of my story is to spend your money on generating more torque.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,050
21,218
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 3, 2020
#33
  • Sep 3, 2020
  • #33
...then fix all the crap you break.

 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Sep 3, 2020
#34
  • Sep 3, 2020
  • #34
4.10s or nothing, bow down peasants!

I mean, errr... umm.... carry on!
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Sep 3, 2020
#35
  • Sep 3, 2020
  • #35
Noobz347 said:
I've more or less stopped playing with gears. A little fine-tuning one way or another to get cruize speeds in 4th and 5th might be nice.

One thing led to another in the engine bay until I ended up with enough torque and HP in the little Fox that I said, "Uncle" or "Enough" or "I'm going to die soon I should stop". It's a streetcar. It's still sporting the original 2:73s and traction is still a huge issue. LoL

I guess that the moral of my story is to spend your money on generating more torque.
Click to expand...
I can see that moral lol. I guess with this 94 it's getting the engine that was in the other car. 291 hp with 306 ft lbs of torque. It will get LT's vs shorties though but everything else will remain the same. I will likely leave that setup in the car for a long long time and that's even @ 182 k miles on that block. I also have the 351 to build with the 95 and bought a Terminator July of 19 and so I have enough to mess with that I can afford to have each car's in levels of hp which was my goal anyway when my other car got hit in 2015.
Basically this car I'm glad I went with gearing it since it'll likely keep the 302 for awhile and I remeber how it was in my other car so i'll be glad for that little bit of a kick
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Sep 23, 2020
#36
  • Sep 23, 2020
  • #36
410s for more fun stop light to stop light. (Non aspirated)
Just how I see it. I mean if you're going to the trouble and expense of installing gears why not go with 410s ? And absolutely fms gears, especially if your doing your own install. I used the existing size pinion shim (good pattern) and they are just as quiet as the factory 308s were.
 
Last edited: Sep 23, 2020

HemiRick

I'd be looking at jacking under the house
Jun 28, 2020
723
272
73
Memphis TN
Sep 23, 2020
#37
  • Sep 23, 2020
  • #37
Another fan of lower number gears here. My car was factory ordered w the 3.08 and I love it. I drove a 3.73 car once and it was crazy unless unless spinning tires was your goal. Even w the 3.08 gotta be real careful launching in 1st if you actually want to go. I'd say spend your $$ on motor/suspension/tires and gears wont matter. One thing no one on here seems to consider is motor life....the less rpms it turns the longer it lasts. Gears are a cheap way to make a real quick kick in the pants improvement, but long term, like loud exhaust get old IMHO.
 
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Sep 25, 2020
#38
  • Sep 25, 2020
  • #38
I guess some 94-95 GTs are more powerful than others however in stock form IMHO tire spinning takes some effort. I drove one back when it was allmost brand new and not much grunt. I've allways thought they needed much lower gears. Now if were talking 86-93 GTs well that's a different story. I had an 87 sd that had 273s and could chirp 4th gear. Also had a 93 that was fine with stock gears.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
894
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
541
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?