• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

351 under stock hood

  • Thread starter Thread starter 393 notch
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

393 notch

New Member
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
0
Jan 15, 2007
#21
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #21
THX WOODROW. ILL CHECK IT OUT.. FOUND IT... THX RAY
 

393 notch

New Member
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
0
Jan 15, 2007
#22
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #22
HEY MATT, THX BUD. IM ON CORRAL. 82GT5SPEED. HEY MATT SEND ME YOUR EMAIL, YOU GOT MINE RIGHT.. RAY
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 15, 2007
#23
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #23
393 notch said:
Hey 86bluecobra, how do you like that xe274 cam? ive got that one and im second guessing it for the xe 282. i like my power down low in the rpm band . love torque not rpm"s.....
Click to expand...

This cam is awesome. As stated though i have a 351w not a stroked version an i am running a dual plane intake. I talk to a custom cam shop and for my combo he said he couldn't do much better then the cam i have. I chose the XE 274 because it was close to the specs on some nitrous cams and i wanted to get all i could from the juice but not sacrifice N/A power. My car pulls. I actually am surprised how it pulls in fifth gear. So are most of my passengers. I originally installed the XE 268 in my car but stepped it up to the 274. I had thoughts about the 282 but that cam would have drastically dropped my low end torque so i didn't do it. As you have a 393 already making gobs of torque so that 282 cam maynot effect your Windsor as much as it would mine.
 

393 notch

New Member
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
0
Jun 27, 2007
#24
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #24
Hey guys, finally got the 351 (393) with the spider intake under the stock hood. VRISTANG. here is what it took. i got the stock 93 convertable ford motor mounts and had a upper intake fabricated 400.00. i know the price is close to getting a new hood but after looking into it it really is cheaper staying with the stock hood. the paint guy wanted 200.00 and could not gaurantee a proper match of the paint color so i figured 400.00 is better than 700.00 and i really like the stock look (sleeper). the fabricated upper probably does not flow as well as the elbow that came with the coast high spider kit but i cant tell the difference. i think the fabricated piece looks better anyway. and that xe274 cam really does pull. wow. just ask the c6 vette i smoked just outside my local 7-11. anyways the little things i had to get the 351 in the engine bay were trim the battery tray.and cut the original throttle cable bracket. all pretty easy stuff.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 27, 2007
#25
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #25
393 notch said:
Hey guys, finally got the 351 (393) with the spider intake under the stock hood. VRISTANG. here is what it took. i got the stock 93 convertable ford motor mounts and had a upper intake fabricated 400.00. i know the price is close to getting a new hood but after looking into it it really is cheaper staying with the stock hood. the paint guy wanted 200.00 and could not gaurantee a proper match of the paint color so i figured 400.00 is better than 700.00 and i really like the stock look (sleeper). the fabricated upper probably does not flow as well as the elbow that came with the coast high spider kit but i cant tell the difference. i think the fabricated piece looks better anyway. and that xe274 cam really does pull. wow. just ask the c6 vette i smoked just outside my local 7-11. anyways the little things i had to get the 351 in the engine bay were trim the battery tray.and cut the original throttle cable bracket. all pretty easy stuff.
Click to expand...

Awesome
Since this thread came up, I have decided to run a spyder as well...
it will be a few months, as I need to put the motor back together first.

*I think you know this question is coming....*
Got any pics of that intake?


Congrats on getting things setup up the way you wanted

jason
 

393 notch

New Member
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
0
Jun 27, 2007
#26
  • Jun 27, 2007
  • #26
Hey vri i do have photos, i just dont know how to post them. its been a while.
 

393 notch

New Member
Jan 1, 2007
46
0
0
Mar 6, 2009
#27
  • Mar 6, 2009
  • #27
Hey guys i know this is an old thread but after 2 years i now know how to post pics. LOL. Here are some pics of the 351 under the stock hood...












View attachment 267747
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
407
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
892
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
220
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?