• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351C carb size

  • Thread starter Thread starter candoo
  • Start date Start date Jan 26, 2007

candoo

New Member
Jan 26, 2007
7
0
1
Jan 26, 2007
#1
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #1
Hello, new around here.

Looking for opinions on carb size for my 1970 351C 4V FMX 9 inch. Engines only modification is a edelbrock performer and MSD 6A. Currently running rich on a 750.

Thanks
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Jan 26, 2007
#2
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #2
600 vac secondary.
 

Pbum5

Member
Oct 27, 2004
515
0
17
Minneapolis, MN
Jan 26, 2007
#3
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #3
candoo said:
Hello, new around here.

Currently running rich on a 750.

Thanks
Click to expand...


You can try smaller jets.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Jan 26, 2007
#4
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #4
Yeah, I would say try to tune the 750. That's not too big for a 351C-4v.

BTW, howcome I can't drag and drop the skivvies OFF the Zwinky? Oh, and now you're going to tell me you didn't try.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jan 26, 2007
#5
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #5
For a mild 351/auto, that is a touch large. I second the 600 vacuum secondary choice.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 26, 2007
#6
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #6
What 750? If it's a vac secondary Holley, it's perfect, you just need to take th etime to tune it and tailor the secondaries to suit the engine's needs.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 27, 2007
#7
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #7
750 is perfect for that engine.
The only way a carb runs rich is by being over jetted.
Jet it down.
Learn the carb inside/out. Read voraciously on how to tune it.
Otherwise you will end up hating Holleys and never get the best performance you can from your engine.

Do you have the MSD running on points or full MSD ignition?
If you still have points, an effective and cheap mod is to pull the Duraspark distributor out of a 351m/400/460 engine at the boneyard and install it into your Cleveland. They never came with electronic and MSDs are pretty blatant copies of the Duraspark.
You just have to make sure the system gets full voltage and you get a good coil.
The stock ignition feed wire is a resistor and must be bypassed or replaced.

Good luck
Dave

Edit: Make sure you don't have a blown power valve.
This is a common problem on Holleys over 10-12 years old.
Since then Holley has added a PV protection circuit.
If your carb does not have one, save yourself some grief and add one.

Edit2: I see now that I thought you had a Holley.
You don't actually say. I got the impression from later posts.
If you don't have a Holley, disregard my post, then GET ONE.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jan 28, 2007
#8
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #8
750 can easily be made to work well on a Cleveland.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jan 28, 2007
#9
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #9
Here's my thinking: there's a big difference between "can be made work" and the right carb for the application. For a mild small block with an automatic trans, driven only on the street, an 1850, vac secondary Holley is a MUCH better carb. My wife's 427 Corvette runs a 650cfm Holley and delivers 17 mpg. With the 750 that was on it when she bought it, we got 10-12, amd I honestly think it runs better with the smaller carb. But to each his own...
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jan 28, 2007
#10
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #10
I have heard that Holley 750 vacuums don't actually flow 750, more like 650. No knowledge if that is true or not, but I ran a 750 vacuum on a stock 351w for years until it was time to do the motor. Got 16-17 on the highway. This was a carb right out of the box.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jan 29, 2007
#11
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #11
I know lots of guys like larger carbs, heck I've done it myself and in fact currently have a pair of 390 Holleys on my 302. But as a rule, I've found smaller carbs work better on the street. They improve low-end response and mileage without really hurting top end enough to notice on the street. Now if we were talking drag racing, I'd suggest an 850 Holley for a 351, since drag racing tends to favor more of everything. But with tight converters, freeway gears and a stock cam, a smaller carb will work better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
need help and advise
  • amps1956
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
16
Views
548
Other Auto Tech Oct 21, 2025
Mcmahst
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
375
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
527
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
501
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?