• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

460 in a fox

  • Thread starter Thread starter pacecar79
  • Start date Start date Nov 19, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#21
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #21
Re-check the math - 4.2" bore X 4.25" stroke is 471 cubes. Just keeps gettin' better...
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Nov 21, 2004
#22
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #22
Michael Yount said:
Re-check the math - 4.2" bore X 4.25" stroke is 471 cubes. Just keeps gettin' better...
Click to expand...
Yes it does get better...you can STROKE a 460!
Nothing like runing 550 plus cubic inches on the street .
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Nov 21, 2004
#23
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #23
Yeah, $2500 plus $1500 rotating assy, and over $1600 in heads. Because everyone here has that kind of money. Anyways, get a set of stock D0VE-c heads and clean up the exhaust ports and install stiffer springs. Thats good enough to get you in the 400-450 range. To make more power, either port those or go for the interceptor heads. You may want to bump up the comp too. I have D0VE-C heads with some of the smallest chambers around and they still only generate 9 to 1 with the stock pistons. Or get a pre-prepped 460 block ready for a stroker and then get a 514 stroker kit for around $1400. Thats $700 for the block and $1400 for the rotating and now you have a huge stroker for $2300. The heads and stuff are up to you but you can see that a 514 stroker is the same price as 302-351 based stroker. You'll end up spending more on aluminum heads but you'll make up that money with the cheap used intake and standard 750 Holley. Yes heads are expensive but being carbed you dont need to buy injectors, MAF, throttle body and EFI intake. Think about it:
460:
aluminum heads-$2300 new
intake-$170 new
carb-$200
EFI 302:
aluminum heads-$1100-$1600
intake-$350-$600
TB-$150
injectors-$250
MAF-$150-200
Numbers are similar, but the 460 wins if you keep to iron heads. As for weight, if you can spring it, a 460 with aluminum heads and an aluminum intake weighs as much as an iron headed 302.
 
P

pacecar79

New Member
Jun 25, 2004
18
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#24
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #24
would it be overkill to put in a c6 as far as the weight issue goes. the car is going to be very light before the morot. tubular front end, fiberglass fenders and hood, manual steering, aluminum rims... so i dont think it should be much worse than stock?
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Nov 21, 2004
#25
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #25
I forget what the weight is, but it is a good bit higher than a 302. Aluminum heads will help as will what you have already done, but the heads take some of the cheapness out of the power.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#26
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #26
"460 with aluminum heads and an aluminum intake weighs as much as an iron headed 302"

Can you give us some numbers or the source of your data Smock? Everything I've read, the aluminum head/intake 460 would be a good 100 lbs. heavier than a cast iron headed 302.
 

87TTopGT

New Member
Dec 21, 2003
173
1
0
Nov 21, 2004
#27
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #27
Michael Yount said:
Re-check the math - 4.2" bore X 4.25" stroke is 471 cubes. Just keeps gettin' better...
Click to expand...

473.5152 actually...
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Nov 21, 2004
#28
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #28
I saw an '88 notch at the track this summer with a 460/C6 set up and I was impressed. He must have had a fairly mild cam because it idled smooth as glass. Looked like a tight fit under the hood , but he had done really nice clean install on it. He told me the motor was one he got from the jumk yard out of an old van, and just did a basically stock rebuild on it. It ran in the 12's . I just thought it was awesome to see that big block stuffed in a fox.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#29
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #29
I get 471.05....
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Nov 21, 2004
#30
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #30
You know, I took my own advice to check out bigblockfox.com. They have some forums there. The format is so time consuming and hard to read that it is not worth anything IMO. Not to insult any fans or sysops, but that site needs a mo betterer format.
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Nov 21, 2004
#31
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #31
Yeah tried to check it out myself. It was like a message board time warp.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
932
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
439
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
249
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?