• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

65 headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebel65
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2006
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jun 20, 2006
#1
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #1
Hey
i got some headman headers that i am not exactly pleased with
aside from them being kind of an eye sore, they are very much close to impossible to get a wrench to. i don't exactly work on my headers all the time, but i swear to god i don't know how i got them of and on the last time i did it. due to a lot of patience and ingenuity on my part and a couple of friends of mine, we got those suckers off. i don't know if it's because they are damaged or because that's how they are designed but either way i want new ones. I plan on getting some Edelbrock Heads so i want something that can take advantage of the exhaust ports on that. is it the same as stock? i saw that someone put 351 heads on their 302, is that a 'nono' or a taboo thing to do? because that seems like a good way to get a cheap set of better flowing heads, am i wrong?

anyway i was hopeing that you could help me find a set of headers that someone has preferably one for Power Steering and short; since i need that precious clearance space! . anyway i am sorry if this has been answered too many times to count, but i either am incompetent at searching or i don't know where to find this answer. thanks
Shane C.
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Jun 20, 2006
#2
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #2
Well as far headers go, I am not sure what ones you could go with. Hooker makes a good set, Maybe some FRP's..I run with a set of headmans on a 351 in a 65, and I have no problems at all.

Well as far as the 351 heads on a 302, yes that will work, but I think you have to do a few things. You would probaly need 351 swap headers for that combo. I do believe that is what a Boss 302 engine is..351 heads on an 302.

Though I could be wrong.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jun 20, 2006
#3
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #3
I had '69 351w heads on my '65 289 and used a set of Hooker Super Comps for a 302 in a '65-'66 Mustang and it worked fine. The deck height on a 351w is higher than a 289/302 so that's why they have the 351w specific headers for putting a351w in a '65-'66. There are two different style 351 heads, the Windsor and the Cleveland. The Cleveland heads on a 302 are what makes a Boss 302.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jun 20, 2006
#4
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #4
Take a look at the Hedman shorties.
 

AdamInChains

Member
Apr 22, 2006
128
0
16
Jun 20, 2006
#5
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #5
i have a set of Hedman shorties that a ceramic coated and they work great
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Jun 20, 2006
#6
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #6
I'm not sure when they changed but later 351 heads won't do you any good. The early ones are the ones with the bigger valves. The 351's also had bigger combustion chambers than early 302's. You might want to check and see what that would do to your compression.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jun 20, 2006
#7
  • Jun 20, 2006
  • #7
Danny: That is part of the reason i am looking for a slightly lower compression ratio with better flow for future upgrades.

Stangninjak & 1320stang: So bassically if i geta pair of 69 windsor heads and a set of 351 swap headers from like BBK is what i can see on summit racing. i need shorties, but i don't want to sacrifice being able to take my headers off.

Does anyone with Headman Shorties have dificulty using even a very small box wrench?

also what cam would be preferable for a pair of 351w heads to keep a nice idle while roaring a bit more ?
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Aug 11, 2006
#8
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #8
hi, sorry to bring this back, but i didn't really get these last questions answered and i am going to go ahead and slap on the 69 heads i have on my 289 until i get the rest of the 351w going.

just for clairity's sake.

my big questions are. will i see a performance increase if i get a new cam?

do i need 351w swap headers?

and lastly what cam should i get for an otherwise stock 4barrel 289. ( everything i have is in sig ) ? i'm going to come into enough money to get this swap done this weekend so i want to jump ahead and do some work on my car while i still have the Time to do so. i saw a lot of people with 69 351w heads in their sig. help me out guys !! i know you're there and i gotta say i love this forum!!
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Aug 11, 2006
#9
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #9
Nope, the 351w headers are for putting the whole 351 in the car as the deck height is higher, the heads are dimensionally the same.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Aug 11, 2006
#10
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #10
thanks, that's what i thought because of the deck height of the block, but someone in this thread even said they thought i would need them. Thanks 1320, you're my hero to debunk what i was thinking .

now i just have to find an affordable cam and i'll be set..i suppose heh.
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Aug 11, 2006
#11
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #11
ah, the old box wrench too big around to get on the bolt syndrome, ...you have two options, get yourself a good quality wrench, and grind the outside down until it fits, OR (my favorite solution) flag down a snap on tools truck, and buy yourself a 3/8" 12 point wrench. i just installed a set of hedmans, and it is pretty tight. i have a snap on, and, i think, a bonney box end wrench, and they are the only 2 wrenches i have that will even come close to fitting
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
87
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
755
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
607
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?