• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

86 Mystery Mods Progress!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slobin3d
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 2 of 10 Next Last

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 26, 2017
#21
  • Sep 26, 2017
  • #21
karthief said:
Likely a explorer engine transplant
Find a plasic line that should come from under the firewall at the passenger frame rail in the engine compartment and passes by the shock tower, that is the fuel tank vent and needs to hooked up to a charcoal canistrr with the related solenoid and stuff, can be had new so no problems there.
Click to expand...
I'll have to see what all is still under the car. If it's a transplant, explorers have WAY more power then it needs, this car gets sideways at 1/2 throttle in second gear no problem, assuming of course it doesn't starve for fuel and stumble. Lol
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,867
10,541
203
polk county florida
Sep 26, 2017
#22
  • Sep 26, 2017
  • #22
They really didn't have any more power than a mustang 5.0, maybe a little more in the torque department. It probably has a taller gear in the back, a cheap mod is gt40 heads, better valve springs and an explorer intake, you got the jump on that already. You just need to un hack the rest of it. They guys here will help you out.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 26, 2017
#23
  • Sep 26, 2017
  • #23
Explorer engines just need a cam swap to make them a bit more suited to a light car like a fox.

I do notice no ACT sensor mounted in the lower intake, and you have manifold vacuum applied to the BAP sensor on a mass air equipped car. Both should be corrected.

I'd run the codes and see what else is missing. Does it have o2 sensors?
 
Reactions: General karthief

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Sep 26, 2017
#24
  • Sep 26, 2017
  • #24
Check the computer behind the passenger kick panel. I'm interested to see which computer you have.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 26, 2017
#25
  • Sep 26, 2017
  • #25
Mustang5L5 said:
Explorer engines just need a cam swap to make them a bit more suited to a light car like a fox.

I do notice no ACT sensor mounted in the lower intake, and you have manifold vacuum applied to the BAP sensor on a mass air equipped car. Both should be corrected.

I'd run the codes and see what else is missing. Does it have o2 sensors?
Click to expand...
It does have O2 sensors, we had the car on a lift before I bought it. There also looked to be a few connectors I thought we're O2 sensors under the car on the drivers side that weren't connected to anything, but I found the o2's and they were connected, maybe a speed sensor or backup light? It looked like a round 4 or 6 pin, don't recall
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 27, 2017
#26
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #26
Probably the VSS or NGS sensor...both which should really be hooked up for the car to run properly as both affect the car's neutral idle strategy and what happens when coming to a stop and pressing the clutch pedal in.

Add them to the list of things to identify and correct.
 
Reactions: Slobin3d

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 27, 2017
#27
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #27
Mustang5L5 said:
I see a mass air meter, and a vac line still present on the BAP sensor on the firewall.

If the MAF conversion was completed and there is a MAF computer in the car, then pull the vac line off the BAP, and cap it, and leave the BAP port open.
Click to expand...

+1
 

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 27, 2017
#28
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #28
So cap the vacuum line, and leave it plugged in, or remove it?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 27, 2017
#29
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #29
First thing to really do is pop your passenger side kick panel and let us know what ECU the car has
 

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 27, 2017
#30
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #30
Pic of the ecu
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170927_180922.webp
    361.5 KB · Views: 193

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 27, 2017
#31
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #31
VM1

1986 5-Spd speed density computer
 

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 27, 2017
#32
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #32
Mustang5L5 said:
VM1

1986 5-Spd speed density computer
Click to expand...
So what's that mean
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,867
10,541
203
polk county florida
Sep 27, 2017
#33
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #33
Stock computer
 

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 27, 2017
#34
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #34
Will it work with the mods done, or am I going to have to source a newer ecu and harness?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,867
10,541
203
polk county florida
Sep 27, 2017
#35
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #35
I think if you are running a maf then you need a maf computer, speed density does not have a maf.
@Mustang5L5
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 27, 2017
#36
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #36
Well it means the vacuum line on the BAP can stay as is, and you should see if that MAF has any wiring and if it's connected to anything.

Also, everything unplugged under the car needs to find its home.

Have you run the codes?
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Sep 27, 2017
#37
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #37
Running codes may not work without the round plug under the car hooked up. ( if its the neutral switch )....or if the clutch switch isn't hooked up. That is a built in safety feature so you can't run a KOER test with the car in gear. That would end real bad.

One of the first things is identifying everything that isn't plugged in. Then you need to dissect the added wiring to see where the PO tapped in to stuff.

The car runs and drives....that's way more than half the battle. You know it has the stock 86 computer so the wiring should be the same as an 86 5.0

There was a way that people would wire a MAF sensor into a speed density computer like yours. I don't remember off hand ( that was at least 15yrs ago ). I don't think an 87+ computer would work on your car because the dash harness is a little different.

You need a good wiring schematic for your year and model car. Then you need to trace and repair all the botched up wiring.

The emissions stuff usually won't cause driveability problems....other than pinging from no egr function on hills while cruising ( light throttle ).

The ECT sensor is very important. If the car doesn't know how warm it is it could cause a high idle condition, rough idling, and stumbles while driving. There should be two on your car. One temperature sender for the stock gauge ( one wire ) and another for the cars computer ( 2 wires ). There should also be an IAT sensor....it goes in the intake and read air temperature.

The air temp sensor and coolant temp sensor look almost identical other than the very tip.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Sep 27, 2017
#38
  • Sep 27, 2017
  • #38
I know the ACT has been mentioned, but did anyone notice that the previous owner did connect the ACT sensor but instead of trapping the lower intake or moving it to the air box they just layed it next to the distributor lol.
 
Reactions: Slobin3d

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Sep 28, 2017
#39
  • Sep 28, 2017
  • #39
90sickfox said:
Running codes may not work without the round plug under the car hooked up. ( if its the neutral switch )....or if the clutch switch isn't hooked up. That is a built in safety feature so you can't run a KOER test with the car in gear. That would end real bad.
Click to expand...

It is wired in parallel with the switch on the clutch pedal, so as long as he's holding the clutch down the entire time it will allow him to proceed.

That assumes it's hooked up to a functional switch of course.
 

Slobin3d

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
246
17
38
Sep 28, 2017
#40
  • Sep 28, 2017
  • #40
This is the plug under the car I was mentioning.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170928_154145.webp
    440.1 KB · Views: 151
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 2 of 10 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
681
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
275
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
W
Help with 95 GT
  • waynewl34
  • Apr 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
280
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 5, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?