• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

'88 GT Convertible - Croatia, Europe

  • Thread starter Thread starter snovak
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2020
  • Tags Tags
    assembly lube engine bay
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
First Prev 25 of 25
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Oct 29, 2022
#481
  • Oct 29, 2022
  • #481
New engine:
Tearing down the engine slowly...still can't find damn recommended crank grinder.
Now as I have time I took comfort to clean the valvetrain parts and lifters in a ultrasonic bath...
Rockers took some wear but I will lightly polish them, just enough to make contact surfaces smooooooth

Old engine:
Drove some 50 miles in new 5w40 Maxlife synthetic and oil pressure on idle is 20psi.
Now I only have to pass yearly inspection and it will have a winter sleep.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221029_120814.webp
    122.9 KB · Views: 162
  • IMG_20221029_120803.webp
    105.1 KB · Views: 162
  • IMG_20221029_120746.webp
    102.4 KB · Views: 157
  • IMG_20221029_120826.webp
    102.9 KB · Views: 150
Reactions: 90sickfox
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Nov 27, 2022
#482
  • Nov 27, 2022
  • #482
Okay, new engine apart.

I will measure skirts in next few days, only skirts show wear.
Cylinder bores have a bit wear marks from the cylinder skirts also, but honing is still clearly visible. No deep scratches, can't feel them with fingernail. But, you can feel the edge at the top of the cylinder bore with finger.

I plan to reuse the pistons, wear is there, but does not seem too much. See pictures, and tell me if it is a good idea to hone and re-ring. Thnx.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221127_205016.webp
    203.1 KB · Views: 194
  • IMG_20221127_205032.webp
    70.9 KB · Views: 167
  • IMG_20221127_205050.webp
    151.5 KB · Views: 148
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Dec 10, 2022
#483
  • Dec 10, 2022
  • #483
This is how ultrasound cleans the pistons and rods (scrapes are from manual wire brushing carbon deposits)....

Shall I try to slightly&gently polish the skirts? Something crossed my mind: Did anybody use that cerakote stuff on skirts?

Still need to measure the skirts, but now I am obstructed and out of the garage due to the word cup... I hope You cheer for us (Croatia )
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221210_173412.webp
    120.6 KB · Views: 211
  • IMG_20221210_173356.webp
    179.5 KB · Views: 148
  • IMG_20221210_173429.webp
    133.9 KB · Views: 140

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,953
10,598
203
polk county florida
Dec 10, 2022
#484
  • Dec 10, 2022
  • #484
Ceracote stuff is prolly not worth the money for a mild street engine but I don't know the costs, my factory pistons had over a 100k on them with little wear
Oh, GO CROATIA!
unless they are playing the US.
 
Reactions: snovak
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Dec 12, 2022
#485
  • Dec 12, 2022
  • #485
@General karthief got me wrong there, was just thinking into replacing worn 0.001" with ceracote. But You are right, looking into the price tag.... does not make sense....

Pictures of rubber polished pistons attached... proud about results!!!!
Roughly measure says middle of specification. I would say REUSABLE....

You reminded me with Your footnote:
Croatia played first official soccer game under modern independed flag with - USA. Way back in October, 1990. Google it , I remember that match as it was yesterday.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221212_204401.webp
    131.6 KB · Views: 154
  • IMG_20221212_204337.webp
    264.9 KB · Views: 147
  • IMG_20221212_204322.webp
    163.4 KB · Views: 193
  • IMG_20221212_204305.webp
    376 KB · Views: 168
Reactions: 90sickfox

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,953
10,598
203
polk county florida
Dec 12, 2022
#486
  • Dec 12, 2022
  • #486
I think we got knocked out this year, I don't follow soccer, motor racing like Nascar and drag racing for me.
Oh, and nice job on those pistons
 
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Mar 6, 2023
#487
  • Mar 6, 2023
  • #487
Howdy!

I am still here, project is still alive
After some other projects (bought 2012 F-150 STX with Coyote 5.0), machine shop finished the crankshaft so I went back to my spare engine rebuild.

Checked the crank with some used .010 bearings...

Plastigage say:
Main oil clearance 0.002
Con rod oil clearance 0.002

Feeler gauge:
Crank play 0.0078

Border tolerance for crank play, but could be okay...
Next to check are the pistons after polishing them and backyard cylinder honing still need to be done (three stones tool)...I hope those dirty oil scoring marks will disappear with light hone...

Just from curiosity, what is the maximum allowable piston to cylinder wall clearance on TRW pistons? I mean before noticeable piston slap?
I know factory is 0.003 to 0.0035, but I ask from experience?
My pistons first measured ~3.996" which is below tolerance -0.0012", and I expect the backyard honing to take away another 0.001" (at least) from cylinder wall.... so I could have eyeballing 'bout 0.006-0.008" piston to wall....

Thnx!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230306_221947.webp
    219.4 KB · Views: 148
  • IMG_20230305_104158.webp
    273.6 KB · Views: 139
  • IMG_20230305_105517.webp
    125 KB · Views: 142
  • IMG_20230305_105552.webp
    112.8 KB · Views: 132
  • IMG_20230306_212603.webp
    205.4 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_20230306_221950.webp
    208.9 KB · Views: 141

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,536
714
143
Roy, Utah
Mar 7, 2023
#488
  • Mar 7, 2023
  • #488
Punch it out, or knurl the pistons
That is a bit excessive for piston to bore clearance IMO
On the thrust, you are asking for trouble anything over 8 thou
 
Reactions: snovak
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Mar 7, 2023
#489
  • Mar 7, 2023
  • #489
Okay. This is as deep as I would go with hone 320 grit for moly rings.
Clearance 0.0045"
What will yall say? Good to go for trw pistons and moly rings?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230307_175115.webp
    137.3 KB · Views: 144
  • IMG_20230307_175102.webp
    179 KB · Views: 132
  • IMG_20230307_175055.webp
    176.2 KB · Views: 140
  • IMG_20230307_175049.webp
    241.2 KB · Views: 144
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Feb 15, 2024
#490
  • Feb 15, 2024
  • #490
Hi yall.
Long time no report

After a backyard hot tank at the end of last year I finally found a bit of inspiration to start working on engine again.
Stock piston compressio rings had .0030-ish gaps so I went with a .005 rings in order to file fit them.

Said, done... yesterday. Looking at the numbers, I have:
- 1st rings on three pistons .015-.0157, rest are .017-.019 max.
- 2nd rings on three pistons .0197, rest are .0217-.0236 max.
- oil rings all inside .0197 min to .0236 max.
Graph attached.
Question: Shall I file thoose three compression rings a bit more to be safe or I should be fine (book says .010 to .020)?

Cylinder wall taper is well under 0.002" after honing.
Damn... guess I did not oil after WD40 spray: on cylinder walls there were some "spots" of some surface rust pitting from standing a longish time. They went out with a few hone strokes, but the surface "etching" is still visible. Guess it went a bit deeper into steel, a few spots per cylinder, not worth boring I think so... check picture.

Heads look okay.
Almost all of the exhaust valves had a lot of pitting on 44° face so I took them to my workplace and we ground 44°.
A few valve stem tips have a kind of edge chipping around perimeter where valve stem is chamfered. Thoose may be from hex hitting stem during disassembly, but what this may show? On the other hand, wear marks are nearly perfect on valve stem tips. I must picture this...
Valve lapping follows

Thnx a lot for comments and suggestions!
 

Attachments

  • Snimka zaslona 2024-02-14 145547.webp
    17.2 KB · Views: 137
  • pitting.webp
    39 KB · Views: 136
  • exh_valves.webp
    41.9 KB · Views: 128

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,536
714
143
Roy, Utah
Feb 19, 2024
#491
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #491
You need the correct margin on the valves or they will burn
That margin is what you see below the pitting (needs to be roughly .80- .120")
Be careful grinding the valves and seats
Easy to get the valve sucked into the head too far and make the lifter plunger be in the wrong spot, you get a lifter tick that will not go away
I also thing you are asking for trouble with your piston to bore clearance
Same with the ring ridges, those need to be removed before punching the pistons out to not crack the ring lands
Your ring ridge was light, so the piston ring lands are most likely okay
3rd time around this thing needs to be fixed for the knock
Good luck
Maybe run the engine on a test stand before stabbing it into your Mustang
Ehen you say "good to go with TRW pistons"? What? You got new pistons?
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,536
714
143
Roy, Utah
Feb 19, 2024
#492
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #492
Ring end gap spec is .020 for the top ring and add .008 for the second ring
So ,020 and ,028 is the minimum.
If you have ever cracked a set of rings due to lack of end gap...
That tears pistons and bores up real bad (ask me how I know)
 
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Feb 19, 2024
#493
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #493
manicmechanic007 said:
Ring end gap spec is .020 for the top ring and add .008 for the second ring
So ,020 and ,028 is the minimum.
If you have ever cracked a set of rings due to lack of end gap...
That tears pistons and bores up real bad (ask me how I know)
Click to expand...
Thnx.
Then I will file cylinder 5,7,8 rings a bit more to get the end gap in range of .017 as the rest. Second rings are .022

Your numbers are a bit on safe side, but You just said why... :-(
I read a lot about it and found consensus: for NA in general there is a .004 per inch, for 302 some guidelines are .016-.018 and +.004 for second rings. Of course for spray or blower You need to open up further (sometimes double).

manicmechanic007 said:
3rd time around this thing needs to be fixed for the knock
Good luck
Maybe run the engine on a test stand before stabbing it into your Mustang
Ehen you say "good to go with TRW pistons"? What? You got new pistons?
Click to expand...
Nay pal, You got it all mixed up. It is not THAT engine.
As I doubt in cracked block, this is a second 302 I managed to buy overseas and I build it as a spare engine.
I belive this one could run good with a hone, rering and bearing job (crank was ground .010). So yes, OEM TRW pistons...

Matching number 302 is still in the car, still runnin'. I plan to do an oil change before the season (now), and to pour in Valvoline VR1 20w50 just to keep the oil pressure up on hot idle. I allready got the blood and filters ready.

manicmechanic007 said:
You need the correct margin on the valves or they will burn
That margin is what you see below the pitting (needs to be roughly .80- .120")
Good luck
Maybe run the engine on a test stand before stabbing it into your Mustang
Click to expand...
Yeah, we just licked the 44° face until the pitting went out. Margin was therefore not changed too much and was within spec. Allhtru, I still need to check the stem to guide clearance.

Thnx.
For running the engine on a stand I would need a cooler and fuel supply which is less of a problem than EEC, cables here overseas.
UNFORTUNATELY I have enough of practice to make it fast enough :-(
 
Reactions: General karthief

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,472
2,903
173
Florida
Feb 19, 2024
#494
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #494
Much safer to err on a slightly larger ring gap than a smaller one...
 
Reactions: snovak

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,536
714
143
Roy, Utah
Feb 19, 2024
#495
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #495
Sweet, I did not realize / remember you got another block
The piston type and ring manufacturer have more to do with the ring end gap than the Ford spec does these days on a rebuild
The rule of thumb for Hastings for instance is 3.5 thousandths per inch of bore (means .014 is okay for a 4 inch bore)
We saw a bunch of 302's that knocked slightly under base warranty when new
All or most had specs within tolerance on everything we could check including piston to wall clearance
Problem was eventually narrowed down to piston slap on #1 on a few of them
No need for a stand then
Run it. My Boss 302 (forged) pistons are set up a little loose to go racing
 
Reactions: snovak and General karthief
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Feb 19, 2024
#496
  • Feb 19, 2024
  • #496
manicmechanic007 said:
Sweet, I did not realize / remember you got another block
Click to expand...
Ain't it?
You want sweet? Sweet is that I hunted AOD tranny for a spare engine...and last week I just scored ANOTHER 302 with AOD as a part of a good deal in Germany.

I took it cause I doubt that the matching number block is cracked somewhere and therefore loosing oil pressure when hot.
302 casting numbers say it is a roller block from 1987. Turning okay, no more info. Comes from F150 with foxbody upper intake, so it is probabbly a flat tappet and truck cam if it is stock. I believe rollers started in 1992 on truck?
AOD casting number says it is a 1983, comes with converter and sadly no more info than that.
I will know more when truck arrives, maybe I just got a pile of junk...

First I must finish assembly of this 'spare' 302, then I will take a look at that spare AOD guts

Sooo, y'all got a V8, 302 junkie over here, overseas.
Just keen to keep that old fox on the road whatever it takes...
 
Reactions: 90sickfox, General karthief, AeroCoupe and 2 others
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Oct 11, 2025
#497
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • #497
Hi all!

Neee some advice:

I just installed the crankshaft and pistons into the block, which had been waiting for assembly for at least a yea

I used Plastigage to check clearances — the crank is ground -.010, giving about 0.015–0.020" on the mains and 0.016–0.018" on the rods.

While removing the Plastigage, I noticed a shiny upper connecting rod bearing — I assumed it had just seated itself.

Attached are some pictures of the rod bearings after about 30–50 turns of the crank (during piston installation, oiling between turns, and wiping excess oil from the cylinder walls). Assembly lube was used, of course.

Upper is much worse. You can’t feel any marks with a fingernail, but it looks like contamination — even though everything was clean (pistons, rods, caps, and bolts were all cleaned in an ultrasonic bath).

I also re-checked the crank’s oil passages with a brush before installation.

This is driving me crazy.

Not sure what to do now — just put it together, or tear it all down and clean everything again?

Thnx...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20251011_124608.webp
    80.6 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG_20251011_124556.webp
    55.3 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_20251011_162311.webp
    99 KB · Views: 52

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,163
21,335
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 11, 2025
#498
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • #498
snovak said:
Hi all!

Neee some advice:

I just installed the crankshaft and pistons into the block, which had been waiting for assembly for at least a yea

I used Plastigage to check clearances — the crank is ground -.010, giving about 0.015–0.020" on the mains and 0.016–0.018" on the rods.

While removing the Plastigage, I noticed a shiny upper connecting rod bearing — I assumed it had just seated itself.

Attached are some pictures of the rod bearings after about 30–50 turns of the crank (during piston installation, oiling between turns, and wiping excess oil from the cylinder walls). Assembly lube was used, of course.

Upper is much worse. You can’t feel any marks with a fingernail, but it looks like contamination — even though everything was clean (pistons, rods, caps, and bolts were all cleaned in an ultrasonic bath).

I also re-checked the crank’s oil passages with a brush before installation.

This is driving me crazy.

Not sure what to do now — just put it together, or tear it all down and clean everything again?

Thnx...
Click to expand...

Merged into your original thread.
 
S

snovak

Active Member
Oct 9, 2020
260
143
53
Croatia
Oct 12, 2025
#499
  • Oct 12, 2025
  • #499
Noobz347 said:
Merged into your original thread.
Click to expand...
I went to another topic cause it is another engine as mentioned above, but okay...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
First Prev 25 of 25
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
299
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
B
Engine Another no start after washing engine bay
  • bruno
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
737
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
K
Electrical 2000 GT Intermittent Engine Shutdown In Motion - DTC U1262
  • kenster1092
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
225
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2026
squeak93
P
Fox Opinions Wanted- at a crossroad with my '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
pindude80
P
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
461
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?