• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

aftermarket H-pipe w/ cats

  • Thread starter Thread starter haoleboy72
  • Start date Start date Jan 17, 2007
H

haoleboy72

Member
Dec 11, 2006
60
0
6
Hillsboro, OR
Jan 17, 2007
#1
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #1
Anybody had problems passing emissions w/ a catted h-pipe? I was planning on buying a MAC h-pipe w/cats, but one of the local guys says he failed emissions. He has a pretty aggressive setup w/ edelbrock heads and intake w/ a e303 cam. I plan to have a similiar setup just TFS instead of edelbrock. I prefer to have a catted h-pipe, but I do not want to spend all that money and not be able to pass emissions. I prefer not to run an O/R pipe then switch to the stock for emissions. Just wonder if anyone has had success with the MAC pipe or another brand. Thanks for any help i receive.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 18, 2007
#2
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #2
A new three-way-catalyzed pipe should pass easily. I pass the sniffer but fail visually because my aftermarket catted H only has two cats and the OEM pipe technically had four. I don't know how emissions testing is in Hawaii though.

One thing to consider is that I've seen a few threads lately with people failing with aftermarket cats that are not too old. Yet the stock H cleans things up (the stock cats really hold up fairly well).

Good luck.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jan 18, 2007
#3
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #3
the newer h pipes all should have better designed cats and shouldn't have a problem passing "functional" tests.
 

smokin91'

New Member
Feb 19, 2006
204
2
0
Jan 18, 2007
#4
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #4
I put a mac H with the 2 high flow cats on this spring for emissions testing and I passed with flying colours. I kept it on after the test too because there was no loss/gain of power as compared to my catless X-pipe, and I think the H pipe sounds much better, having had both an X and H on my car.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jan 18, 2007
#5
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #5
my buddy with an afr headed 5.0 lost 21 horse from going to a 2 catted x pipe from an offroad pipe, verified on the dyno. However, with people with lower hp levels, it's not going to make a difference as mentioned.
 

smokin91'

New Member
Feb 19, 2006
204
2
0
Jan 18, 2007
#6
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #6
v8only said:
my buddy with an afr headed 5.0 lost 21 horse from going to a 2 catted x pipe from an offroad pipe, verified on the dyno. However, with people with lower hp levels, it's not going to make a difference as mentioned.
Click to expand...

Thats not typical at all. What else was changed besides the pipe in between the 2 pulls? How much power was he making to begin with?
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jan 18, 2007
#7
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #7
i'll get the details, but I believe it was 321 at the wheels with the offroad pipe, and I believe no other changes were made. I'll talk to him tomorrow and get the full scoop, but I do know that # I listed is accurate.
 
H

haoleboy72

Member
Dec 11, 2006
60
0
6
Hillsboro, OR
Jan 18, 2007
#8
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #8
To everyone who failed the visual inspection, what state are you in? Anybody from oregon fail a visual inspection?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 18, 2007
#9
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #9
I'm in AZ. And apologies - after seeing your username I assumed (incorrectly) that you were in Hawaii.

You might find that regarding how strict they are about the testing, it really comes down to what County you're in. I seem to recall Oregon having testing every two years, which is always nice (it's yearly here).

There are some folks from Portland on here (as well as a Grant's Pass guy, K-Falls, etc). They might chime in.

Good luck.
 
H

haoleboy72

Member
Dec 11, 2006
60
0
6
Hillsboro, OR
Jan 18, 2007
#10
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #10
No need to apologize, you were almost correct! I lived in Hawaii for 9 years and my wife is an island girl. We moved to OR 7years ago for my job. My job sent me to AZ about 1 1/2yrs ago for some training, seen alot of real nice stangs rollin around. I guess it's easier to justify buying/modifing a stang when you can drive it 365!
 

fox-gt

Member
Feb 28, 2004
204
0
17
TN
Jan 19, 2007
#11
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #11
No problems passing so far.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jan 19, 2007
#12
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #12
im in NJ, i had a BBK catted H and passed the sniffer no problemo. actually it was cleaner then stock in some areas
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox BBK X-pipe replacement Cat?
  • TIGGER
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
D
Exhaust Bbk mid pipe and flowmaster catback fitment issues?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jun 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
988
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
dqureshi06
D
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
343
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?