• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Another subframe connector thread =P

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calypso5oh
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Calypso5oh

New Member
May 30, 2011
9
0
1
Santa Clarita Ca.
Jan 6, 2012
#1
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #1
First of all thank you everyone to responding to my question on headlight assembly installation . I have been surfing the net trying to find the answer to this question: Is it worth instaling full lengh subframe connectors instead of the standard lengh version? Most answers I see are "go for it" or "they are longer so they are better". I haven't been able to find a concrete answer as to if it's worth the extra money. My 93 notchback 5.0 is bone stock. I plan on doing a few minor bolt on's (better brakes, gt40 intake, exhaust) but that is about it. It's not going to be drag raced and I occasionaly do some canyon driving but nothing extreme. I figured the full lengh would probably be stiffer but is it overkill for my application??
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 6, 2012
#2
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #2
I see no downside to the full length units. Their longer overall length offer more contact points for the installer to weld them to the sub frame of the vehicle. This means that the torsional force applied to them when the chassis flexes and twists under load and hard bumps will lessen the detrimental effects on both the sub frame and the sub frame connectors themselves. A larger surface area with more contact points means that instead of transferring all of the energy into a single area, it’s now spread over a larger real estate and can more effectively absorb and control the shock.

Set a Websters Dictionary on a single egg and it crushes under the weight. Set it on top of a dozen of them and that same mass is now split 12-ways handles the load.

Same principal.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 6, 2012
#3
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #3
My opinion would be that the regular sized sub frames will stiffen it up plenty for what you're doing. Springs, upper / lower control arms, etc. should make the sub frames shine. If there isn't a too large of a gap between the price then just go for the bigger ones.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 6, 2012
#4
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #4
The price is about the same Id go full length, or if you want the best...through floor. Depends what your plans are with the car.
 
D

DavidEwers

Member
Sep 23, 2011
168
1
18
Somewhere in Paradise
Jan 6, 2012
#5
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #5
go with the standard size in fact I would even say go with the boltons and later on them get them welded.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 6, 2012
#6
  • Jan 6, 2012
  • #6
My standard length MM SFCs make the car so rigid, I can put 3 jack stands under the car at each corner, and the 4th corner won't sag. I noticed that one day when I was working on the suspension and saw that one of my stands had about a 1/4" gap... It wasn't actually touching the car, haha.

That said, if the price isn't that much different, I don't see any harm in going with full lengths, other than maybe a slight weight difference.

DavidEwers said:
go with the standard size in fact I would even say go with the boltons and later on them get them welded.
Click to expand...

I would say don't waste time with bolt-ons. Either buy a weld-in set and have them welded in or don't do them at all. IMO, it's really one of those things that if you're going to do it half-ass, what's the point?
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,943
2,897
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 7, 2012
#7
  • Jan 7, 2012
  • #7
NikwoaC said:
My standard length MM SFCs make the car so rigid, I can put 3 jack stands under the car at each corner, and the 4th corner won't sag. I noticed that one day when I was working on the suspension and saw that one of my stands had about a 1/4" gap... It wasn't actually touching the car, haha.

That said, if the price isn't that much different, I don't see any harm in going with full lengths, other than maybe a slight weight difference.



I would say don't waste time with bolt-ons. Either buy a weld-in set and have them welded in or don't do them at all. IMO, it's really one of those things that if you're going to do it half-ass, what's the point?
Click to expand...

+1
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,355
207
114
Ohio
Jan 9, 2012
#8
  • Jan 9, 2012
  • #8
I agree, would only use weld in SFCs.
 

castine917

Member
Mar 20, 2009
126
3
19
Wyoming, Mi.
Jan 10, 2012
#9
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #9
Going with full length instead of "regular/short" means if you decide later to be more aggressive you will already have all the work done and not have to go back to do it a second time.
 

jdb3rd

Member
Apr 28, 2005
166
3
19
edgewater MD
Jan 10, 2012
#10
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #10
I have a question to add to this what are your opinions on the suspension being loaded or not when welding in subframe connectors? I've done it both ways and didn't notice a difference in the results.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jan 10, 2012
#11
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #11
It should be loaded on the suspension for best results. Perhaps if it was pretty close you wouldn't notice in street driving, but if you road race or Autocross your car you may notice some strange handling characteristics at the limit and suspension tuning issues.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 10, 2012
#12
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #12
The suspension MUST be loaded not so much for changes in driving characteristics after the fact, but because the body panels won't line up correctly otherwise. These cars are about as rigid as a string of dry spaghetti. I've seen body sag several inches and doors not open, or shut properly with a car lifted otherwise. At the very least, drive the front end up onto ramps and set jack stands under the rear axle when taking it up off the ground. If you don't, you're asking for problems.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 10, 2012
#13
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #13
if your worried about cost between full length and an short bars. id pick up a set of UPR's think i paid like 75 bucks or something like that for mine on sale
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 10, 2012
#14
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #14
91TwighlightGT said:
It should be loaded on the suspension for best results. Perhaps if it was pretty close you wouldn't notice in street driving, but if you road race or Autocross your car you may notice some strange handling characteristics at the limit and suspension tuning issues.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... Don't know that I believe that.

Gearbanger 101 said:
The suspension MUST be loaded not so much for changes in driving characteristics after the fact, but because the body panels won't line up correctly otherwise. These cars are about as rigid as a string of dry spaghetti. I've seen body sag several inches and doors not open, or shut properly with a car lifted otherwise. At the very least, drive the front end up onto ramps and set jack stands under the rear axle when taking it up off the ground. If you don't, you're asking for problems.
Click to expand...

That's more the explanation that I would be on board with. Though I'll say that the guy who welded mine in was a race car builder and owned a collision repair shop and he insisted he put it on his chassis lift to do it. He said with his lift, that would be the straightest the car would be. I've never had any problems since
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Jan 10, 2012
#15
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #15
They're cheap enough, I would just buy the full lengths. I think the MM ones are like 150.. I need to buy some for mine, but I don't know where I could take it to to have them installed
 

ReefBlueHatch

Active Member
Jan 12, 2010
682
96
39
Central KY
Jan 10, 2012
#16
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #16
I guess I'm the only odd ball, but really didn't notice any difference when I had SFC's installed
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 10, 2012
#17
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #17
ReefBlueHatch said:
I guess I'm the only odd ball, but really didn't notice any difference when I had SFC's installed
Click to expand...

Yea, most people don't until they put some power to it and the windshield cracks because the body twists like a pretzel, haha. I had a buddy that happened to.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jan 10, 2012
#18
  • Jan 10, 2012
  • #18
NikwoaC said:
Hmmm... Don't know that I believe that.



That's more the explanation that I would be on board with. Though I'll say that the guy who welded mine in was a race car builder and owned a collision repair shop and he insisted he put it on his chassis lift to do it. He said with his lift, that would be the straightest the car would be. I've never had any problems since
Click to expand...

You would be surprised what a small amount of pre-load in a chassis can do to handling. Again, I am not saying that your average driver on the street would notice a difference, but if you are going for the last tenth, it could cause you an issue.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 11, 2012
#19
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #19
91TwighlightGT said:
You would be surprised what a small amount of pre-load in a chassis can do to handling. Again, I am not saying that your average driver on the street would notice a difference, but if you are going for the last tenth, it could cause you an issue.
Click to expand...

The thing is you're preloading the unibody, not the suspension. The suspension (control arms, shocks, springs, etc) and its geometry would remain almost completely unaffected. So if you fubar a sfc install, I can see where your doors might have trouble closing, but I have serious doubts that it would produce any sort of noticeable effect in handling,
 

5.0 Coupe

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
64
9
8
Tucson, AZ
Jan 12, 2012
#20
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #20
Calypso5oh said:
First of all thank you everyone to responding to my question on headlight assembly installation . I have been surfing the net trying to find the answer to this question: Is it worth instaling full lengh subframe connectors instead of the standard lengh version? Most answers I see are "go for it" or "they are longer so they are better". I haven't been able to find a concrete answer as to if it's worth the extra money. My 93 notchback 5.0 is bone stock. I plan on doing a few minor bolt on's (better brakes, gt40 intake, exhaust) but that is about it. It's not going to be drag raced and I occasionaly do some canyon driving but nothing extreme. I figured the full lengh would probably be stiffer but is it overkill for my application??
Click to expand...
I have had subframe connectors installed several times, both the standard size and full length. Full length is the best way to go, mainly because of the frame rails up front. Full length uses all of the frame rails, standard does not, which leaves serveral inchs of Stock Frame Rail.
The problem is when you go to jack up the car, which I do a lot, the normal place you place jack stands or jack up the car is right where the stock frame rails are located and after may uses of jack stands and lifts, those stock frame rails get really beat up.
If you have full length, you wont have this issue, because the full length covers the whole Frame rail, plus full length rails look better...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
802
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Paint and Body DIY undertray thread
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Feb 20, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2024
Vulpes5.0
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
87 LX 'Vert
  • fun331
  • Jun 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 30, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?