• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Bang For My Buck: V3 Or Tfs 170

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lxwhite
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 3, 2014
#41
  • Mar 3, 2014
  • #41
A5literMan said:
Most mishaps with forced induction are due to improper installation/tuning issues/getting greedy with boost. A low boost setup done right will last a long time.
Click to expand...

Like most athletes that get caught, using only a little boost is hard to do. "I can take just a little more" is deadly when the thrill wears off. The speed bug is mean monkey if you are on a small budget is all I am warning about. Most OEM boosted motors are built for the boost.
 
Last edited: Mar 3, 2014
Reactions: 2000xp8 and A5literMan

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,108
2,724
224
Vass, NC
Mar 3, 2014
#42
  • Mar 3, 2014
  • #42
Neither side is wrong. Either way is fine, and you will be happy with the power increase overall. So, just go with whatever you want to have, and don't be deterred if your feelings take you either way. With more money and time, you can always go back to add the other option later. Fortunately, it's not an either/or situation forever, and the effects of each of these will multiply the effects of the other when they are both used. Still, I lean toward the N/A route. Why?

1. Simplicity. In my mind, despite the prevailing "wisdom" in this thread, it's simpler. No, not simpler to install, but simpler to tune, and simpler in the sense that there are fewer things to go wrong. Obviously, with a blower you're adding an additional mechanical part that could fail, but in the bigger picture adding boost also adds heat to the intake air/fuel which in turn increases the likelihood of a detonation event. It makes the tune more sensitive, and increases the probability of engine damage should another mechanical issue arise. A good tune, IMO, is an absolute necessity for boosted cars. Whereas, you can get away with adjusting timing and fuel pressure to achieve something that gets you in the ballpark without being afraid of detonation when you stay N/A.

2. Maintenance/Reliability. Instead of adding power/stress to old parts, you'd be replacing at least some old parts with new ones. You'd be in a better position to see the current state of your motor, and you'd be able to do some basic maintenance if need be.

3. Performance/Perception. You may not give a damn about what other car guys think, but most enthusiasts actually do, even if they won't admit it. And car guys think a mustang with a supercharger ought to run like... well, a badass blown American V8. Even if you do squeeze the 100 rwhp out of a blower, and I think you probably could, you're still only making 15-20 hp more than a good HCI combo, and your car is significantly heavier in wrong place to boot. i.e. you're adding the weight of a blower and assorted hardware (~50-70lbs?) on the already front-heavy fox instead of subtracting ~50 lbs by switching to some aluminum heads. I outran, on several occasions, fox-bodies with blowers with my old H/C/I fox. I was absolutely thrilled with what was, at the time, a surprising result to me. I think I would've felt the exact opposite if I were in a blown car and lost to a nearly identical N/A one.

4. Fuel economy, if that matters to you. Blowers suck power from the crankshaft, period. They do it at full power, idle, or cruise. Furthermore, they're typically tuned a little more "fat" and with less timing. This means they use more fuel for the same amount of power. Conversely, adding heads and an intake should improve volumetric efficiency, and you have the option of improving thermal efficiency if you choose to increase the compression ratio, which is as simple as selecting and or milling the heads to the appropriate combustion chamber volume for your target compression ratio. The minimal tolerance for and ever-present concern about detonation with a blower combo means you should probably avoid the lower octane fuel to boot.

Ps. And buddy, if you can't afford a nice used intake, which is likely to come with a good throttle body and injectors too, you can't afford to do the blower right, either. Good luck in your choice.
 
Last edited: Mar 3, 2014
Reactions: A5literMan

David Pepiton

Active Member
Dec 17, 2011
662
68
49
Laveen, Arizona
Mar 3, 2014
#43
  • Mar 3, 2014
  • #43
84Ttop said:
@bentley429isBAC Terrible advice all around if you ask me.

Let's compare apples to apples here, a quality made complete turn key centrifugal kit vs some eBay incomplete turbo kit that 1/2 way fits on a good day and offers some menial warranty at best?

New Vortech Kit = 3 year warranty, turn key product!
Click to expand...
its like trying to use toilet paper twice I guess.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
757
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
315
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?