• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best Intake for my Combo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WowZach32
  • Start date Start date Aug 2, 2022
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

WowZach32

Member
Aug 1, 2022
17
3
13
North Carolina
Aug 2, 2022
#1
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #1
Hey fellas

I have a 1994 Mustang Cobra with the following setup.

BBK CAI
BBK Throttle Body
Stock upper and lower cobra intake.
AFR 165cc Heads.
Trickflow Stage 2 Cam.
Stock bottom end.
4.10 Gears.
$$$Rwhp - $$$ft/lbs

The AFR website has an intake manifold recommendation being the Performer or Performer RPM intake manifold. I didn’t immediately fall into one of those because I am not sure that info is up to date. It hasn’t changed since 2019 when I bought the heads. This car is only street driven, but everything I do is preparing it to be the best it can be as a naturally aspirated 302. $1500 budget for the intake. If I left out any relevant info just let me know in the comments.

Best Regards,

Zachary
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Aug 2, 2022
#2
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #2
Holley systemax would work nicely.
 

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Aug 2, 2022
#3
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #3
You have the Cobra intake. They are dyno'd to be in the top three
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 2, 2022
#4
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #4
I’m thinking you should have @tmoss port the lower intake, drive it, and save some money.
What size are the TB and MAF?
 

WowZach32

Member
Aug 1, 2022
17
3
13
North Carolina
Aug 2, 2022
#5
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #5
Potomus Pete said:
You have the Cobra intake. They are dyno'd to be in the top three
Click to expand...
That is awesome, I did not know that! Is number 1 in the lead by a substantial amount?
 

WowZach32

Member
Aug 1, 2022
17
3
13
North Carolina
Aug 2, 2022
#6
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #6
7991LXnSHO said:
I’m thinking you should have @tmoss port the lower intake, drive it, and save some money.
What size are the TB and MAF?
Click to expand...
TMOSS, that is a name I have known from years from browsing mustang forums. If he still does that how can I reach him?
I am running a 70mm throttle body from BBK and I believe I am running the stock MAF, but I will check when I get home. If it is something other than stock I will reply again.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 2, 2022
#7
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #7
WowZach32 said:
That is awesome, I did not know that! Is number 1 in the lead by a substantial amount?
Click to expand...
There are some RPM range differences. And getting either now might be an issue.
Do you want to spin it to 5500 or 6500 rpm, and where do you want the torque?

Edelbrock Mustang Performer Intake Manifold (86-95) 5.0 3821

Get more horsepower & torque out of your 1986-1995 Mustang 5.0 with this Edelbrock Performer intake manifold!
lmr.com
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-7123/make/ford
 
Last edited: Aug 3, 2022
Reactions: General karthief

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 2, 2022
#8
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #8
7991LXnSHO said:
There are some RPM range differences. And getting either now might be an issue.
Do you want to skim it to 5500 or 6500 rpm, and where do you want the torque?

Edelbrock Mustang Performer Intake Manifold (86-95) 5.0 3821

Get more horsepower & torque out of your 1986-1995 Mustang 5.0 with this Edelbrock Performer intake manifold!
lmr.com
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-7123/make/ford
Click to expand...
I tagged Todd Moss, and he still stops by periodically, and here is a site with a lot of info from him.
Edit: here is the link and an email is at the bottom.

Tmoss Porting

tmoss.efidynotuning.com
 
Last edited: Aug 3, 2022

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Aug 2, 2022
#9
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #9
I have a Cobra with a ported lower on my AFR 165 setup and it works pretty well. I’m sure a Performer RPM 2 or SystemMax would make more power up top, but I like the low end the Cobra has.
 

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Aug 2, 2022
#10
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #10
Cobra looks better. Especially painted with Aluma paint
 

WowZach32

Member
Aug 1, 2022
17
3
13
North Carolina
Aug 2, 2022
#11
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #11
7991LXnSHO said:
There are some RPM range differences. And getting either now might be an issue.
Do you want to skim it to 5500 or 6500 rpm, and where do you want the torque?

Edelbrock Mustang Performer Intake Manifold (86-95) 5.0 3821

Get more horsepower & torque out of your 1986-1995 Mustang 5.0 with this Edelbrock Performer intake manifold!
lmr.com
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-7123/make/ford
Click to expand...
I am comfortable running it all the way up to 6k RPM. I love torque! I want all the torques! Unless there is too much torque? Currently the car Dyno's at 285hp / 323tq at the motor. I guess the perfect outcome for NA would be like 300hp / 350tq if that is within the realm of possibilities for a NA 302. Also, could you educate me on the "RPM range differences" you mentioned? I am new and have been doing all of this by myself with the help of these forums and YouTube the past 4 years. (Unless you meant between the different manifolds and their availability, then disregard.)
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Aug 2, 2022
#12
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #12
The stock cobra intake flows around 205 to 210 cfm. ( quoted from tmoss ) The rpm range is up to about 5800 to 6k. Your camshaft tops out at about 6k. Heads flow 165 cfm Seems like a good fit to me but I'm no pro. From what I've heard it's velocity that you want.
 

WowZach32

Member
Aug 1, 2022
17
3
13
North Carolina
Aug 2, 2022
#13
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #13
90sickfox said:
The stock cobra intake flows around 205 to 210 cfm. ( quoted from tmoss ) The rpm range is up to about 5800 to 6k. Your camshaft tops out at about 6k. Heads flow 165 cfm Seems like a good fit to me but I'm no pro. From what I've heard it's velocity that you want.
Click to expand...
Me either man, but that's why we are here. Surely if all of us rub our brain cells together we can come up with something pretty good lol I hope it ends up being the case that I can use my Cobra Intake. It like the Cobra logo being on top of the motor. I don't want to take any shortcuts though. I reached out to Tmoss via email. I'll go with whatever he says. He seems like the expert around here.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,892
10,552
203
polk county florida
Aug 2, 2022
#14
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • #14
Torque is king on the street, that cobra intake is what you want for torque, I'm not familiar with the cam so that would be the important factor in the equation, besides the heads, Tmoss could tell you if/where that combo will work.
 
Reactions: limp

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Aug 3, 2022
#15
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #15
Potomus Pete said:
You have the Cobra intake. They are dyno'd to be in the top three
Click to expand...
Top 3 of what ?

I think it’s matched great for his combo without a doubt . It’s a decent intake but I don’t know what it’s top 3 of
 

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Aug 3, 2022
#16
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #16
I'v seen dyno tests on the internent. I think on Corral . Who else has seen this? Anybody ?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,892
10,552
203
polk county florida
Aug 3, 2022
#17
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #17
Seems like I recall a comparison between the cobra, GT40 tubular and the explorer, I don't recall the outcome, bet it was the GT40
https://www.allfordmustangs.com/attachments/afm-dyno-cobra-explorer-gt40-jpg.14240/
But I could be wrong
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,234
17,920
224
Massachusetts
Aug 3, 2022
#18
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #18
GT40 family intake dyno tests

To sum it up:

1-2 HP differences between GT40 tubular and 93 cobra. 94-95 cobra was 5-6 HP less and explorer intake was down about 10HP from the GT40/93cobra. I know some publications out there claim there is no difference between the family, but i've seen enough evidence to convince me that the explorer upper will cost you a few ponies as compared to the tubular/93 upper.

All were run on an unported lower manifold. SOme of the comments asked for doing it with a Tmoss/Bigdogs ported lower. Richard has some other videos wherre he compares the GT40 family intake to aftermarket. The aftermarket intake makes more power, but at higher RPM (over 4500RPM or so) while the GT40 family intake made more power at lower RPM. So really selecting between the two comes down to if you want higher PEAK power at higher RPM (great for racing) or more power at a lower RPM (great for street driven cars).

View: https://youtu.be/ajVnFuqWrqU
 
Last edited: Aug 3, 2022

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Aug 3, 2022
#19
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #19
90sickfox said:
The stock cobra intake flows around 205 to 210 cfm. ( quoted from tmoss ) The rpm range is up to about 5800 to 6k. Your camshaft tops out at about 6k. Heads flow 165 cfm Seems like a good fit to me but I'm no pro. From what I've heard it's velocity that you want.
Click to expand...
Did you mean 265 CFM? According to AFR they flow 260CFM at .600" and 251cfm at .500". I think tmoss mentioned something about getting ~250cfm out of a ported Cobra intake so it should be a great fit.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,892
10,552
203
polk county florida
Aug 3, 2022
#20
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • #20
Just the cool factor for the tubular intake is worth 2-3 hp
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT, Monkeybutt2000 and 1hot87gt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
755
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?