• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

build up of stock 1998 GT >>help<<

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pughman
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away&quot;MISSOURI&quot;
Sep 15, 2005
#21
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #21
TGJ said:
I have yet to see Ported PI's with the swirl dams match Renegade Racing's Ported NPI's flow across the board. Johnny Langton's ported NPI's flow 225 CFM at .550 lift with the swirl dams. Fox Lake's Stage II's don't, VT Stage II's don't flow that well and those NPI's outflow those ported PI's across the board. If you want PI's that flow better, you need MPH PI's but those have the swirl dams removed, so they are slow burning heads. Removing the swirl dams from NPI's is one of the features of the SVO head, which ported will OUTFLOW MPH Stage III's. So you might want to rethink that.
Click to expand...


PI vs NPI-data

http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?threadid=2634&highlight=NPI+heads
 
N

NPIGT

New Member
Nov 29, 2004
96
0
0
Sep 15, 2005
#22
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #22
This is the route I'm taking. PI heads and intake manifold, mac long tube headers and shorty offroad H pipe. 4.10 ring and pinion, subframe connectors, steeda tri-ax, and vt stage 1 cams. maybe next summer some N2O, upper tb, plenum, and an aluminum driveshaft. I would atleast go with the intake manifold in your setup if your admint on not changing the heads. Good Luck!!!
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Sep 15, 2005
#23
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #23
Pughman said:
PI vs NPI-data

http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?threadid=2634&highlight=NPI+heads
Click to expand...

I am aware of that thread and many others. That thread is old as things have changed since then.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 15, 2005
#24
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #24
TGJ said:
I am aware of that thread and many others. That thread is old as things have changed since then.
Click to expand...

you have a link for renegade racing? I was aware that they got good flow from npi's but not 225. The most I remember reading about was @212 and i think they were done by steen racing.
 

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away&quot;MISSOURI&quot;
Sep 15, 2005
#25
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #25
TGJ said:
I am aware of that thread and many others. That thread is old as things have changed since then.
Click to expand...


ya ! he got better ! over 300 with the new cams !
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Sep 15, 2005
#26
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #26
droptopponynj said:
you have a link for renegade racing? I was aware that they got good flow from npi's but not 225. The most I remember reading about was @212 and i think they were done by steen racing.
Click to expand...

Renegade racing does not have a web-site. His NPI's intake and coolant ports are PI matched and that is where the extra few CFMs come from.
 

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away&quot;MISSOURI&quot;
Sep 15, 2005
#27
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #27
droptopponynj said:
In the mag they only gained like 8hp with the upper/TB/CAI and i think headers...I have to re-read the article...I had lots of boltons when I was all NPI and didn't feel much in the SOP with full exhaust and CNL CAI,Upper and 75mmTB. Car felt stronger down low but @4000rpm's it would just die...when I did the PI swap it was Night and Day....I contribute most of this to the PI intake and cams...I have driven a NPI GT with just the PI intake and PI cams...and it pulled hard past 5000rpm's...something it didn't do with the NPI stuff.
Click to expand...


is this the one ?

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/tech/mm_0406_mods/
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 15, 2005
#28
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #28
Pughman said:
is this the one ?

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/tech/mm_0406_mods/
Click to expand...


no, the one i was reading was recent, in the past 2-3 issues and was tests run on an actual car....not a ringer motor wist fast engine mngt etc..i will find it and tell you what one. It was actually very dissapointing to read....haha..
 

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away&quot;MISSOURI&quot;
Sep 15, 2005
#29
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #29
ya .. im not look'n for the best as of yet .. just want a nice street machine , ill do the big motor in a couple years...
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 17, 2005
#30
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #30
article was in oct 05 issue of MMFF...
project "red headed stepchild"
stock dyno = 195rwhp
C&L Inlet tube/MAF housing/Filter =0 hp gain?
C&L upper intake/ accufab 75mmTB=2hp
bbk underdrive pulleys=2hp
tune= 7hp

not very good! I've seen these mods on PI gt's make more HP!!! so I totally believe its the NPI intake. more air=more power
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Sep 17, 2005
#31
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #31
damn that project bombed from the start
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 17, 2005
#32
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #32
they want to get 300rwhp and stay completely NPI and NA before they go with the power adder down the road.....I don't think so....but i have to give them props for not sugar coating the numbers and adding these parts to a ringer dyno motor...this was a real 96 that was stock. Damn my car was slow when I bought it....lol
 
V

venom97

Member
Apr 29, 2003
258
8
18
Illinois
Sep 17, 2005
#33
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #33
can you run a blower with the pi conv. i heard it changes the compression a little bit?
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 17, 2005
#34
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #34
venom97 said:
can you run a blower with the pi conv. i heard it changes the compression a little bit?
Click to expand...
yes you can run a blower with a pi swap, if you just change the intake then the compression doesn't change. I know alot of guys running reasonable amounts of boost on full PI swaps with good tunes. You just cant go crazy with that 10.5:1 or so compression.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Sep 17, 2005
#35
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #35
droptopponynj said:
Damn my car was slow when I bought it....lol
Click to expand...

don't remind me about auto non-pi's.. lol




get on yahoo
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Sep 18, 2005
#36
  • Sep 18, 2005
  • #36
no way in hell, they at least need the PI intake, or some super secret aftermarket one.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Sep 18, 2005
#37
  • Sep 18, 2005
  • #37
Well here goes, this is going to be a long list.

2004 PI Heads
2004 PI Intake
FRPP 3.73's
VT Stage 2 Cams
Comp Cams Springs
Mac Straight Shot CAI
Mac Longtubes
Mac Prochamber
Accufab 75mm T body
Granatelli Plenum
Magnaflow Magnapack Catback
Pro 5.0 Shifter
Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch
17x9 and 17x10.5 2004 Cobras
Nitto 555R's 315

My only regret is i wish i had lower compression because i want to go blower. I have a 5.0 stroker on order from VT right now to change all that. If you are going to stay NA i would think about going PI. After seeing the ports on my old NPI vs my new heads there is no contest. The new outflow the old way more. A guy with the SVO heads dyno before me with almost my same mods and he dynoed only 255rwhp on a Mustang Dyno. I dynoed 267 with my new set up, stock unported PI's with VT stage 2's. On the Dyno Jet mine put down 293rwhp.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Sep 18, 2005
#38
  • Sep 18, 2005
  • #38
tomustang said:
get some romeo PI heads+cams, nitrous, port out the stock plenum, get a 75mm tb. you'd be running 12's easy.



you'd need a tune for cams to run good
Click to expand...
While some people will disapprove of the nitrous route, it is the quickest easiest way into the 12's, while still leaving you with the stocker's reliability and fuel mileage.

Edit: If you want to keep the NPI heads, getting them ported and swapping in some cams and a PI intake and then an NX nitrous system would be a relatively easy way to get great results.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
'88 GT vert 302 build
  • cameronc77
  • Oct 24, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2019
08GT500
B
Engine 1998 GT - Weird idle and misfire issues
  • bio4554
  • Jul 30, 2018
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
5K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 12, 2018
tirebytes
T
2013 GT speedo will not calibrate with custom tune- help!!!!
  • WIKDPNY
  • Apr 18, 2019
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 18, 2019
WIKDPNY
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?