• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Bumperettes on GT valance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Red5oh
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2006
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#1
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #1
I am starting to get the GT valance on my 67 and noticed the brackets that attach to the lower of the valance and go to the structure behind the gas tank.

I hate the bumperettes and do not want to put them in, but the bracket seems to need to be there as the valance is a fairly flimsy piece. How did everyone take care of the lower bolts that attach the valance to the bracket, those bolts are fairly large and are a phillips head.

Any suggestions?
 
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#2
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #2
I found a quick picture and its the circled bolts.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#3
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #3
On the 65/66 the bumperettes are replaced by the exhaust thru valance.

It doesn't have any extra support and it seems fine. I wouldn't think the metal would be any thinner on the '67's. You could probably weld up the holes.
 
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#4
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #4
sorry... mine is not this car... I have a new GT valance with the cutouts, but it seems to be a bit flimsy... like it needs the brackets that are on the back side of the valance to give it some stiffness. I am not wanting to put the bumperettes back on, but that bolt that is circles, is required to attach the valance to the bracket. I noticed that reen and a few others did not drill the hole and wondered what they did.

Maybe their valance was strong enough to be without it, but I dont think mine is. I could always weld the valance to the bracket but I figured that might be a bit extreme
 
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#5
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #5
See, this is Reen's car. I know it was not put together at this time, but still no holes for the bracket at all.
 
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 15, 2006
#6
  • Apr 15, 2006
  • #6
Here are two more I found..
68keyblr and mdjay
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
545
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
D
1985 Mustang GT Battery Wiring and Grounds
  • DienstXIV
  • Dec 22, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 23, 2024
85GTStangGuy
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
716
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
439
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?