• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Calculating HP

  • Thread starter Thread starter toyman
  • Start date Start date Jul 24, 2010

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Jul 24, 2010
#1
  • Jul 24, 2010
  • #1
I've wondered what my car is putting down to the rear wheels without the benefit of a dyno. The formula to calculate HP is:

HP= (Nc * injector rating * duty cycle)/ bsfc

Where Nc = Number of cylinders and bsfc = brake specific fuel consumption. The bsfc for a supercharged engine running at an AFR of 11.8 should be about .5.

Since I can data log my duty cycle and AFR the calculation for my setup is:

HP= (8 *42 * .7)/.5 = 470 which I assume is at the crank. With a 20% loss through the drive line the rwhp = 376. Does that look about right?
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jul 26, 2010
#2
  • Jul 26, 2010
  • #2
sounds low with that combo.
 

moosetang408w

New Member
Jul 13, 2005
90
0
0
Alberta, Canada
Jul 26, 2010
#3
  • Jul 26, 2010
  • #3
That formula is quite general. It is assuming alot of different aspects! Probably get you in the ballpark though. I used Desktop Dyno Software to guestimate and even then I would only trust it within 15%.

I like to use the formula (money spent)/5=rwhp
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Jul 26, 2010
#4
  • Jul 26, 2010
  • #4
toyman said:
I've wondered what my car is putting down to the rear wheels without the benefit of a dyno. The formula to calculate HP is:

HP= (Nc * injector rating * duty cycle)/ bsfc

Where Nc = Number of cylinders and bsfc = brake specific fuel consumption. The bsfc for a supercharged engine running at an AFR of 11.8 should be about .5.

Since I can data log my duty cycle and AFR the calculation for my setup is:

HP= (8 *42 * .7)/.5 = 470 which I assume is at the crank. With a 20% loss through the drive line the rwhp = 376. Does that look about right?
Click to expand...

With your combo you should be getting about 520 at the crank which would indicate a BSFC of 0.45. Very good for a blower combo and probably because the twin screw is efficient. Drivetrain loss will be ~23% so you're looking at an even 400rwhp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?