• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Carbed 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter purplestang90
  • Start date Start date Feb 20, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 26, 2011
#41
  • Feb 26, 2011
  • #41
madmike1157,

There's no point in getting defensive. If you feel safe using that part, go for it. If someone asks for advice/opinions, they won't always be the "YEAH DUDE GO FOR IT!" variety.

Like i said...i installed one, and i saw nothing but sketchy fuel pressure readings, and it can only be hooked up one way so it's not like it wasn't installed correctly. I was even tempted to install a secondary regulator after the bypass regulator...but i just didn't feel safe doing it.

Oh, and Webers aren't that hard to tune...they make tools to dial them in and you go in a sequence.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 26, 2011
#42
  • Feb 26, 2011
  • #42
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
madmike1157,

Oh, and Webers aren't that hard to tune...they make tools to dial them in and you go in a sequence.
Click to expand...

All the the tool does is to help syncronize the throttle opening. The rest of the tune is done by ear and observation. Sync the throttle opening on 4 sets of throttle butterflies and the rest of the settings 8 times, and even if it is a simple process, it represents a lot of work and time.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 26, 2011
#43
  • Feb 26, 2011
  • #43
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
madmike1157,

There's no point in getting defensive. If you feel safe using that part, go for it. If someone asks for advice/opinions, they won't always be the "YEAH DUDE GO FOR IT!" variety.

Like i said...i installed one, and i saw nothing but sketchy fuel pressure readings, and it can only be hooked up one way so it's not like it wasn't installed correctly. I was even tempted to install a secondary regulator after the bypass regulator...but i just didn't feel safe doing it.

Oh, and Webers aren't that hard to tune...they make tools to dial them in and you go in a sequence.
Click to expand...

For the record; I'm not getting defensive. You advised the guy against using a FP regulator that you had problems with. You may have had a defective unit, (it wouldn't be the first time one product was simply defective and not typical of the entire offering of that product) But,...you didn't replace it, instead you did whatever else and are now dogging that model as crap.
a $90.00 potential fire hazard is about how you worded it.
Return regulators are pretty simple. I'm sure you know that there is a spring that the PUMP pressure has to overcome once the regulator is set. The fact that it is a return regulator, is pretty much keeping that problem in check. The same principle that works w/o incident on the stock EFI engine.
If you had one that allowed pressure to surge +- 6-7 PSI then I too would've been justifiably concerned as well. But I'm the guy that will not just throw away something if it doesn't work w/o checking to make sure it, or something else is the problem,.. call the guy that made it,... determine if I got a bad unit, replace it w/ the same, AND if it's still junk,....dog that product for what it is.
A conventional, non-return regulator might be a different situation since it basically is a fixed restriction and does allow FP to spike when flow stops.
Most return regulators don't have the range to restrict EFI pressures down to carb pressures, but for the ones that are built specifically for it....well, here's a problem,...There's a possible fix.

I believe you advised the guy to replace the tank. As the right way to do it, I agreed w/ you.
But there is almost always more than one way to do something,other "fixes" that aren't going to compromise the safety of the driver.

W/ regard to the Webers, I understand there are tools and a methodology to setting/tuning them. I'd have no problem with it.Have looked into it a few times, but the price always keeps killing me. But where the last few threads have had issues where a carb or adding multiple carbs was the question, almost every other reply has been about how much tuning is required to make it work.... how unreliable a carb is, how antiquated a carb is... on that note, the Webers are sombodys' wake up screaming nightmare.
 

93project

Active Member
Apr 21, 2009
549
52
38
El Paso, tx
Feb 26, 2011
#44
  • Feb 26, 2011
  • #44
Back to the original point, I swapped my 93 to carb the right way. I did it because I had severe damage to the efi harness that resulted in my having to track down a new setup. Expensive. Im not driving the car daily anymore so I built a new 331, topped it with edelbrock heads, gold comp rockers, . 500" cam, and am edelbrock carb. I did have to completely repair and modify my chassis harness including ignition switch and clutch switch to get it to work. Works great, fires right up. I used a blue holley pump and regulator, ditched the efi pump, but retained the hanger so I could pull the gas from there with gravity feed. Last was an msd dizzy for carb with proper gear for hydraulic cam, and an msd 6al to handle spark, no duraspark for me thanks

Not a lazy guy at all, and I am more than capable of working efi mustangs, been doing it since 90. I just had too many melted wires, damaged connectors, etc to go repair.
 

purplestang90

New Member
Aug 4, 2008
44
0
0
Buchanan County, Virginia
Feb 28, 2011
#45
  • Feb 28, 2011
  • #45
So anyway i just wanted a simple answer,I have an efi toy just wanted to try a carb the lx i bought still has all the factory wiring and everything its no big deal to put back efi,i got all the efi stuff layin around,but i would like to try the carb.,just need some education on it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
66
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
FUEL PUMP ALWAYS ON
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
210
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Yesterday at 8:27 PM
Mcmahst
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
722
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
D
Fuel 1985 GT Fuel Line Diagram
  • DienstXIV
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 12, 2025
DienstXIV
D
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
737
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?