• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Coil overs on the street?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox racer
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2006

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Jul 13, 2006
#1
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #1
I want to put Coil overs on my car after Install some MM Caste/Camber plates. A buddy of mine says the will be noisy, have a harsh ride and ruin the driveability of my car. Especially on the street (DD). Is this tru?
I currently have Eibach launch springs and Lakewood 70/30s and the car sits low in the back and real high in the front. I want to lower the fron without cutting the springs. What brand should I use? Didnt 91TT use the UPR with no problem? FINALLY: Waht spring rate should I get? I want to as close as possible replicate the way the car launches (drag springs in there now) without the coil overs. Thnak gusy!
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jul 13, 2006
#2
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #2
Actually you will get a better effective spring rate and a softer ride.
 

89Notch

Founding Member
Oct 21, 1999
1,669
0
0
MSU
Jul 13, 2006
#3
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #3
he is wrong, better ride, i don't know about noise but who cares
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Jul 13, 2006
#4
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #4
Your ride should be better not worse.
 

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Jul 13, 2006
#5
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #5
Good good, better ride is good. What about the spring rate, what should I go for? What about comapany also? thanks!
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jul 13, 2006
#6
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #6
I have an MMR front coil over kit with 175 lb springs. They don't make any noise. I'm happy with them. For the rear I have 12 way adjustable QA1 shocks/coil overs with 150lb springs. I love the way my car rides/handles with them.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Jul 13, 2006
#7
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #7
I am looking at doing this too, who has the cheapest kit? MM's is pretty expensive.
 
M

ms93gt

New Member
Oct 15, 2004
239
0
0
Bayville, NJ
Jul 14, 2006
#8
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #8
I like my granatelli kit with QA1 springs.
 
X

xherdlr

New Member
May 19, 2003
159
0
0
Hendersonville,Nc
Jul 14, 2006
#9
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #9
Heres UPRs kit...The ride is very nice...Better than stock...




Kelly
 

Attachments

  • pics5034.webp
    28.3 KB · Views: 167

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Jul 14, 2006
#10
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #10
OK Im probably going with the UPR kit, Ive always heard good stuff about it. Now, what spring rate should i run? And will the fit my lakewood shocks?
 
X

xherdlr

New Member
May 19, 2003
159
0
0
Hendersonville,Nc
Jul 14, 2006
#11
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #11
UPR will help you decide. Alot of variables come into play. Example: Aluminum or iron heads, street,strip,or road course. Just give them a call...

Kelly
 

bryce93lx

Member
Jan 20, 2006
88
1
19
Luke AFB AZ
Jul 15, 2006
#12
  • Jul 15, 2006
  • #12
i have the full mm coil over kit it was 1,600 dallars knowing the differance it made in my car i would have paid 3600 for the same results, you will never regret the money for a second, mm has custom tuned bilstines, and as any good racer knows the suppension is 98% about the shocks, call mm buy and enjoy a brand new car
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Jul 15, 2006
#13
  • Jul 15, 2006
  • #13
UPR=GARBAGE!!!!! Period!!!

Had them on my 89 coupe.

The "ONLY" reason I had them on was because I used to do some work for UPR and I got them for free.

They DO rattle and they DO make noise. There are NO rubber isolaters so they transmit every road noise into your car.

When you jack the car up there is NO tension on the spring and the whole assembly just flops around.

I would NEVER do it again in a street car. Its just not worth it IMHO.


Sorry for the rant, just don't want you to be dissapointed, thats all.

If anyone tells you any different they are lying to you.

If I was going to even consider a coilover setup it would have to have isolaters and be solidly mounted to the strut.
 

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Jul 15, 2006
#14
  • Jul 15, 2006
  • #14
04sleeper said:
UPR=GARBAGE!!!!! Period!!!

Had them on my 89 coupe.

The "ONLY" reason I had them on was because I used to do some work for UPR and I got them for free.
Click to expand...

Yea, comin from someone who sold one of the nicest coupes Ive ever seen





J/K! So you think I should hold out and save for the MM kist? im only doing the front because I will eventually have a tubular K member and tubular A arms.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Jul 15, 2006
#15
  • Jul 15, 2006
  • #15
fox racer said:
Yea, comin from someone who sold one of the nicest coupes Ive ever seen





J/K! So you think I should hold out and save for the MM kist? im only doing the front because I will eventually have a tubular K member and tubular A arms.
Click to expand...
Lol...Yeah well.... Thanks for the compliment. My new car fit the shoes nicely to replace it.

Yes, if it were me I would wait until you could save up for the better kit. It seems MM is one of the best ones out on the market and would probably be the one I would buy if I had to do it again. That or KW or something alike.

As far as the K-Member and a-arms are concerned, they were nice and worked well but I do not support or reccomend anything they sell anymore due to the owner's poor busniess ethics.

Let's just say I have made him a lot of money off my ideas....
 
9

9 Deuce GT

Member
Dec 10, 2003
550
1
16
Geneva, NY
Jul 16, 2006
#16
  • Jul 16, 2006
  • #16
Do yourself a favor and just get the MM kit. You will not be sorry. But the above poster is right, it's all about the shocks.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 16, 2006
#17
  • Jul 16, 2006
  • #17
I have GMS coilovers, I didn't notice any difference in the drivabilty, except for the fact I coud adjust them easily.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
277
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
New to me 98 Cobra
  • bird_dog0347
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?