• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Dissappointing 331 Dyno

  • Thread starter Thread starter speeddemon40
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2003
S

speeddemon40

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2001
63
0
6
Kennesaw, GA
Dec 15, 2003
#1
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #1
Ok...I finally got my 331 dynoed the other day...After allittle messing with FP and Timing it made 330/360. I know with more tuning it should be able to make a little more, but the guy running the dyno told me I should get a new intake, 75mm throttle body, 80mm MAF, 1 3/4" headers, 3" exhaust, and bigger power pipe and possibly new heads. what do you guys think? what intake/heads should i put on there? The TFS R intake with AFR 185s?
Thanks
BTW cam specs are 536/560 224/226 112 LS
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 15, 2003
#2
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #2
u will be fine with teh 70mm TB but maybe the mass air upgrade to 80mm is a good idea..and i woul def reccomnend AFR 185s and a custom cam...

o and whats that hits4pay thing? ive seen it alot..does it work
 
S

Silver88gt

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
114
0
0
Vegas
Dec 15, 2003
#3
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #3
Dont be too disappointed. My untuned 331, w/Vic. Jr heads, 230 232 602 602 cam, 10.1 comp, TFS R intake, 80mm PROM, 1 5/8 Long Tubes.. 370rwhp 360twtq
 

DirtyD916

Active Member
May 25, 2003
804
1
38
Norcal 916
Dec 15, 2003
#4
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #4
ya does the hit 4 money bull$hit really work???
 

2MuchPSIForU

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2002
231
0
0
Toronto, Ontario
Dec 15, 2003
#5
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #5
go to the track
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Dec 15, 2003
#6
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #6
I dont think that those are bad numbers at all. you said that there was more room left, so be optimistic about it.
 
J

jdallen1798

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
58
0
0
kansas city kansas
Dec 16, 2003
#7
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #7
Those Arent Bad Numbers Probably Just Need A Little Tweaking.i Have The R Intake But Have Out Of The Box Rpm Heads And Sure I Would Benefit Greatly From Some Port Work And A Custom Cam.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Dec 16, 2003
#8
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #8
why are you saying dont be disappointed when your bragging about your 331 making 40 more horses?
 

EMW150

Founding Member
May 22, 2000
2,020
1
46
Roaring Spring,PA
Dec 16, 2003
#9
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #9
First thing I see is your BBK headers. Did you port the hell out of them? They are very restrictive at the flange from the factory. If yours are 15/8" that's even worse. I used to run their 13/4" but before I put them on I ground the welds out of the inside of the flanges. The welds stuck way out into the ports. They also have a pretty small collector (less than even 21/2"). If you can swing it, put a set of Bassani 13/4" to 17/8" steps on it with an X-pipe and 3" all the way back. On an N/A engine, exhaust gotta flow and scavenge to put up the numbers. Don't be disappointed, it takes a while to get this stuff dialed in. I think you could use some more cam also.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 16, 2003
#10
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #10
EMW150 said:
First thing I see is your BBK headers. Did you port the hell out of them? They are very restrictive at the flange from the factory. If yours are 15/8" that's even worse. I used to run their 13/4" but before I put them on I ground the welds out of the inside of the flanges. The welds stuck way out into the ports. They also have a pretty small collector (less than even 21/2"). If you can swing it, put a set of Bassani 13/4" to 17/8" steps on it with an X-pipe and 3" all the way back. On an N/A engine, exhaust gotta flow and scavenge to put up the numbers. Don't be disappointed, it takes a while to get this stuff dialed in. I think you could use some more cam also.
Click to expand...

Bingo.... I agree with Eric, and I've seen the headers nasty. The cam is too small but I see no reason why you can't make more power with the current set-up, the 80mm and Power Pipe wouldn't hurt since they read better. You are not going to pick up a huge amount by swapping TB's, whats the compression ratio? Hows the curve look, HP and TQ?

Remember Dyno numbers aren't gospel, take it to the track and see how it runs. It will take time but once it all is dialed in and you get good clean runs then you can start making decision of what to change.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Dec 16, 2003
#11
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #11
Why change the heads?? That's crazy talk..

Needs a good cam in there as that cam with the cubic inch is to samll and I would go for a 75mm TB and a 80Pro-M... Maybe even try ditching the Power pipe and trya straight piece.. I here it's worth a few HP....

As for the exhaust I am sure that would pick the car up some also.. This would be a good start.. I think the Intake is fine... The vortech is basically a holley and it should work great...
 
B

bored&stroked

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
68
0
0
Mesa AZ
Dec 16, 2003
#12
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #12
SmockDoiley said:
why are you saying dont be disappointed when your bragging about your 331 making 40 more horses?
Click to expand...

Because you still made good numbers and not every engine combo makes the same power, even using the same components. You can't expect to dulicate #'s. And it didn't seem like he was bragging to me, more like showing what can be done.
 
S

speeddemon40

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2001
63
0
6
Kennesaw, GA
Dec 16, 2003
#13
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #13
Thanks for the responses guys... The only thing done to the heads are the upgraded springs. I think I may have been mislead by FPS on what power the setup would really make. They built the shortblock for me and recommened that cam based on what parts i was going with and that I was gonna put a 150 shot on it. The compression is 10.25 with these heads. The headers are 1 5/8" and but i did grind out some of the nasty weld from the inside of the flanges.
Thanks
Ken
BTW the curves looked real good..it made 300 tq starting at 3200 rpm and was smooth all the way up and it made over 300 hp at 4500 rpm. I'll post my graphs when i get back in town.
 

Kid wita 5oh

I'm definitely not in the original hole
Founding Member
Nov 5, 2000
1,406
149
93
Saugus, MA
Dec 16, 2003
#14
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #14
speeddemon40 said:
Thanks for the responses guys... The only thing done to the heads are the upgraded springs. I think I may have been mislead by FPS on what power the setup would really make. They built the shortblock for me and recommened that cam based on what parts i was going with and that I was gonna put a 150 shot on it. The compression is 10.25 with these heads. The headers are 1 5/8" and but i did grind out some of the nasty weld from the inside of the flanges.
Thanks
Ken
BTW the curves looked real good..it made 300 tq starting at 3200 rpm and was smooth all the way up and it made over 300 hp at 4500 rpm. I'll post my graphs when i get back in town.
Click to expand...


dont feel bad bro, my 351 combo made the same numbers as yours......so your makeing more power per cube than me....
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Dec 16, 2003
#15
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #15
You musn't forget that is rear wheel horse. Realistically you around 400 on engine.. that is great for a 331!
 
S

Silver88gt

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
114
0
0
Vegas
Dec 16, 2003
#16
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #16
SmockDoiley said:
why are you saying dont be disappointed when your bragging about your 331 making 40 more horses?
Click to expand...


WTF... Who said I was bragging. I think that my combo should make way more.. A bigger head, intake, and cam and only 40 more. Come on.
 
S

speeddemon40

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2001
63
0
6
Kennesaw, GA
Dec 17, 2003
#17
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #17
Notchbck93 said:
You musn't forget that is rear wheel horse. Realistically you around 400 on engine.. that is great for a 331!
Click to expand...

Thats true...I didnt even look at it like that..
Thanks,
Ken
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Dec 20, 2003
#18
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #18
331/afr185 10-1 compr. custom comp cam-hyd roller,roller rockers,750 dblr pumper,airgap rpm,1 15/8" jba shortys msd everything 343 rwhp@ 6800! but only 326 # of torque
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
359
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
379
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
476
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?