• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

fiberglass hach vs. stock hach. BTW... how do you spell hach??

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ1979
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2007

russ1979

Member
Oct 6, 2006
152
0
16
albuquerque, new mexico
Jul 19, 2007
#1
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #1
i saw the other day in 5.0 mustang a fiberglass hach for sale for about 350$
i'm guessing that it does not come with the glass so the install would prob be cost a bit.
however i think it would be quit a bit lighter then the stock hach.
does any one have any experance with a fiberglass hack?
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Jul 19, 2007
#2
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #2
No personal experience, but if you want weight anywhere on a car it would be over the rear wheels. I had always thought about doing a fiberglass hatch but then got to thinking that even though a stock hatch weighs more, the weight is in the right place. Don't know if that makes sense or not, but just my .02
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 19, 2007
#3
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #3
Spring for a Fiberglass hood instead.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jul 19, 2007
#4
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #4
Ya put the money towards the hood. If given a choice you want to keep as much weight over the rear as possible vs the front. Either way the glass is still damn heavy unless you got to lexan.
Kevin
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 19, 2007
#5
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #5
You probably wouldn't wanna go with a Lexan window, anyway. As I remember it, they scratch up pretty easy and wind up looking like poo in no time.

If you want to lose weight from the rear hatch, bust out the window and vacuum up the mess. That should shave about 25 lbs. off your total weight. But as stated, that weight over the rear end is actually a good thing - helps keep the tires planted. (Kinda makes me wonder if that's why my notch feels so much more tail-happy than Frankie's Capri - a lot less weight over the rear wheels?)
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jul 19, 2007
#6
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #6
I have a fiberglass rear hatch on my mustang and lexan rear window. The lexan holds up beeter then everyone on here would lead you to believe. As for fit and finish now there is the issue. Mine fits fairly well but there is a few issues. I agree the rear is not where you want to lose wieght but since I did a battery relocate and a roll bar I thought the wieght savings would help me. Oh yah and of course I added a 10lb bottle of the juice to my hatch area.
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
Jul 19, 2007
#7
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #7
No experience with the fiberglass hatch, I can say that the steel one is what kept me competitive with my brothers notch, cause I could get him from the gate almost every time- lots more hook-up weight where the Fox needs it most. Get the hood. I was gonna get one when redoing the stripptmobile, because finding rust free, inexpensive, parts around Chicago is getting tough, but a nice hatch presented itself before I bought. Originals wanna rust at the back, bad, but not a problem in New Mexico, I'm sure.
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
64
Marengo,Ohio,US
Jul 19, 2007
#8
  • Jul 19, 2007
  • #8
Fiberglass hatch and the steel hatch weigh about 5 pounds of each other. The back window weighs as much as the hatch. You can get the urethane adhesive from Advance Auto Parts if you don't have a auto glass shop close. It will cost you $30 in materials for the adhesive and and screws to install the molding clips. Easy job and takes about 30 minutes to install everything it takes longer to align the hatch on the body.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 20, 2007
#9
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #9
A little butle tape is all they use to hold the glass in anyway. Any windshield place should carry it.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 20, 2007
#10
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #10
I'd save up the cash for the fiberglass hood and tubular K-member
 
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
Jul 20, 2007
#11
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #11
speedytang said:
Fiberglass hatch and the steel hatch weigh about 5 pounds of each other.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding me right now?? From what I've read, a Fiberglass bolt on hatch weighs about 11lbs and a lift off weighs about 5lbs, without the glass or anything. I know that glass or whatever adds a lot more, and I don't know what exactly a stock hatch weighs without glass, but I find it very hard to believe it weighs 15lbs.
 

GreatWhite

Member
Feb 24, 2006
232
1
17
Fairfield, PA
www.cardomain.com
Jul 20, 2007
#12
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #12
I'd be afraid of a fiberglass hatch breaking under stress from the rear wheels..
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
40
illinois
Jul 20, 2007
#13
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #13
i had a fiberglass hatch and glass window on my 86 gt. it was definatley a lot lighter than a steel hatch. but i couldnt use the shocks on it becasue it would bow a little . it wasnt a big deal tho. i just left the shocks lay there unattached and when i needed to get in the back i lifted up the hatch and poped em back on to hold it up.
it fit really well and looked 10X better than my rusted out one i had prior.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jul 20, 2007
#14
  • Jul 20, 2007
  • #14
The fiber glass hatch has no spot to mount your hatch shocks. There is no reinforcement to drill holes. Also, if you do not trim it in the correct areas, it won't fit well. I had my friends fitting great, but it still rubbed the paint off the top of the quarters. It also rattled A LOT inside the car. You cannot ground your power lock wire...(IF you have a power latch) Overall, I didn't like it, but at the time someone rear ended his car, and I didn't have a stock one that wasn't rotted. That was back in 2001.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
530
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
C
Engine Intermittent no start
  • claypoolxx
  • May 8, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 19, 2022
claypoolxx
C
Sunroof delete
  • Bree
  • Jan 13, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2021
Noobz347
Planned Cross Country Run - 65 Fastback
  • Smokinstang65
  • Aug 17, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2022
Baron von K 289
B
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?