• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Finally got some CLEAN runs in at the track!

  • Thread starter Thread starter NIKwoaC
  • Start date Start date Sep 22, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 22, 2011
#21
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #21
-Double post from StangNet lock up-
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Sep 22, 2011
#22
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #22
Congrats Nik, those are some petty solid runs. Now fix the traction issues, and then it will be time for somemore extra piping to feed that engine. (Turbo)
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Sep 22, 2011
#23
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #23
Those are good times, especially considering your 60ft and mph. Just curious, what is your mph in the 1/8?
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Sep 22, 2011
#24
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #24
I guess my question isnt valid..How come i went an 8.5 in the 1/8 had an 1.88 60ft ran a 13.3 @ 103 mph why was my top end low...Is it weight?...is it because my timing is set low....Meth flooding on top end..Just curious because im running what you are and probably can run better i have traction....I didnt even take air out of the Mickey thomspon ET street drag radials i was running...My car does weigh 3778 lbs is that a factor?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 22, 2011
#25
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #25
His car ran the back half faster because it is making alot more horsepower than your car, the weight of your car is definitley not helping
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 22, 2011
#26
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #26
Black1987 said:
Congrats Nik, those are some petty solid runs. Now fix the traction issues, and then it will be time for somemore extra piping to feed that engine. (Turbo)
Click to expand...

I was considering a power adder until last night. Now, I want bottom 12s out of the car without a power adder or even so much as lifting the intake manifold. Once I get there, I'll move on to something bigger.

RangerJoe said:
Those are good times, especially considering your 60ft and mph. Just curious, what is your mph in the 1/8?
Click to expand...

D'oh, you should have asked me that before lunch. I had the timeslips with me this morning, but I took them home on my lunch break. I'll try to remember to look at them and answer your question tonight.

MY 85 GT said:
I guess my question isnt valid..How come i went an 8.5 in the 1/8 had an 1.88 60ft ran a 13.3 @ 103 mph why was my top end low...Is it weight?...is it because my timing is set low....Meth flooding on top end..Just curious because im running what you are and probably can run better i have traction....I didnt even take air out of the Mickey thomspon ET street drag radials i was running...My car does weigh 3778 lbs is that a factor?
Click to expand...

Yea, haha, I wasn't quite sure what your question was before. You worded it more like a statement. Like 90lxcoupe said, I think it has more to do with the whole power/weight ratio thing.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 22, 2011
#27
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #27
Hey, what do you guys know about Race Star Industries? They offer 17" junk for many magnitudes less dough than Weld or Billet Specialties.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Sep 22, 2011
#28
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #28
NikwoaC said:
I've plugged it into a couple calculators on the interwebs, I'm getting something like 335-337 to the tire, which is right about where I expected the car to be.
Click to expand...

I normally use a HP calculator that's based on 1/4 mile trap speed 'cause that's more idiot-proof than the ET, but a HP calculator that's based on 1/8 mile trap speed is usually the most accurate 'cause it's less influenced by aerodynamics.
With your engine combo you'll easily trap over 110 at the 1/4 next time.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Sep 22, 2011
#29
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #29
I have zero faith in those HP calculators. Every one i use tells me i have 500hp.
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Sep 22, 2011
#30
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #30
13.1s with a 2.1 60ft is not bad at all!!! Easy 12's with drag radials!
 

1bad67sbf

Active Member
Nov 24, 2010
674
1
29
N. VA
Sep 22, 2011
#31
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #31
i love the Billet Specialties Street Lite, that is a damn good looking wheel IMO. congrats on the ET's, not bad and as you already know it's got alot more in it. you should get to a dyno and tune that thing asap
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 22, 2011
#32
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #32
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I have zero faith in those HP calculators. Every one i use tells me i have 500hp.
Click to expand...

Calculating horsepower from MPH and weight is much more accurate IMO than a chassis dyno.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Sep 22, 2011
#33
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #33
90lxcoupe said:
His car ran the back half faster because it is making alot more horsepower than your car, the weight of your car is definitley not helping
Click to expand...

He might be making more hp then me...I dont think im developing it on top end...My 1/8 and 330 on my slips are compared to 12.3 can that i ran againt.... I seem to be losing it a little after the 1/8 mile..I am supercharged i should be pulling better on top not on bottom..Im thinking my timing is to conservative..Im running 21 degrees total Locked...and running a stage two snow performance water injection kit...From which i was told by the supplier he is making me run rich...so i made some adjustments on the control box and i will play with timing...I think i should be in the 12's i ran a 1.88 60ft on drag radials at 29 psi and i did spin a little....So I should gain not making it as rich, i should gain ET and mph no?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 22, 2011
#34
  • Sep 22, 2011
  • #34
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I have zero faith in those HP calculators. Every one i use tells me i have 500hp.
Click to expand...

Like 90lxcoupe says below, it's actually a fairly accurate method. It takes exactly "W" amount of power to accelerate an object of "X" mass from a standstill to a final speed of "Y" over a distance of "Z". Basic physics. The only problem is, it typically assumes near perfect driving and traction, so it can be off +/- a little. Keep in mind it's basically how a chassis dyno works, the drum is a set mass and the car applies power to accelerate the drum and the computer measures how quickly it does that.

90lxcoupe said:
Calculating horsepower from MPH and weight is much more accurate IMO than a chassis dyno.
Click to expand...

Yep.
 

5LiterWes

Member
May 7, 2002
176
15
19
Milwaukee
Sep 23, 2011
#35
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #35
Awesome times for an untuned car. Congrats!

You gonna put a wideband on the car?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 23, 2011
#36
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #36
5LiterWes said:
Awesome times for an untuned car. Congrats!

You gonna put a wideband on the car?
Click to expand...

Probably sometime this winter, yea.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Sep 23, 2011
#37
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #37
NikwoaC said:
Haha, you get a chance to pull them out last night?
Click to expand...

yeah 5 month old plugs on 12-1 comp, dosent work obvioulsy.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Sep 23, 2011
#38
  • Sep 23, 2011
  • #38
NikwoaC said:
I've plugged it into a couple calculators on the interwebs, I'm getting something like 335-337 to the tire, which is right about where I expected the car to be.
Click to expand...

****, you're going to pick up some good power from where you're currently at. 330 at the wheel? That might be stretching what you're currently at a bit. I'm going from judgment not math here. I know what my old car ran with 311(dyno)-320 rwhp (depending on what that cold-air intake picked up). It went 112.9 mph with 3150 lbs race weight and 4.10 gears. Are you making more power than I did and only going 110? Probably not. Same power with the extra weight? Sounds pretty close. I'd definitely say you're running at least 300rwhp, which to me has already proven your point. FWIW, I went 110mph the first time at the track with the AFR165/FTI cam/ported cobra intake combo. I went 12.9 though
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Sep 24, 2011
#39
  • Sep 24, 2011
  • #39
with a tune I see you going at least 115. get some tires on that thing 11's are waiting!!
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Sep 24, 2011
#40
  • Sep 24, 2011
  • #40
Nice times Nik!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Fox Bucks like a Bronco instead of running like a Mustang
  • just_jayy
  • Jun 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2024
CAMTWO1070
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
916
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Engine OG “Quickie Cooler” Fan/WP Drive
  • 90trunk
  • Apr 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
902
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2024
90trunk
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?