• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Finally ran my car...

  • Thread starter Thread starter KTD SC
  • Start date Start date Aug 11, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

KTD SC

New Member
Jun 21, 2003
99
0
0
New York
Aug 11, 2004
#1
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #1
I went to Lebonon Valley Raceway and i finally ran my car. It was pretty humid, but not to hot.

R/T - .678
60 - 2.552
330 - 6.465
1/8 - 9.664
MPH - 76.77
1000 - 12.409
1/4 - 14.710
MPH - 98.07

Is this good? My reaction time and 60 foot sucked ass, i know that

But other than that, it that good for the mods i have?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 11, 2004
#2
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #2
With some better traction and practice driving the times will come down. I would say yes those time are good for what you have done to the car. How do you like the cobra intake? Did you feel a difference and how much?
 

KTD SC

New Member
Jun 21, 2003
99
0
0
New York
Aug 12, 2004
#3
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #3
Yea the cobra intake is realy nice, it pulls realy hard from like 3k-5k rpms, i paid 320 for it, so it was deff worth the money
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Aug 12, 2004
#4
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #4
Not bad times for such a cruddy 60' time. Don't worry about the reaction time, your time does not start till you leave. Your MPH is pretty good to, low 14's or high 13's.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 12, 2004
#5
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #5
When i was similarly modded like you accept i had a performer instead of a cobra intake, i went 14.0s at 99.90 i even got a 13.96 once at 100.01.
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#6
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #6
Yeah I would say you can do quite a bit better with your mods with some practice. The MPH is great and you can definitely get closer to 14 flat with that MPH. Get some drag radials and you'll cut those 60's times for sure.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Aug 12, 2004
#7
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #7
Dont want to steal the thread but theres always too many "how'd i do" threads and i wanted to post my times no point in startin another thread. this was the first time i've ran my car at the track
r/t- .670
60'-2.212
330-6.188
1/8- 9.514
mph-74.42
1000-12.362
1/4-14.774
mph-93.69

my 60ft was decent for my first time but why was my MPH so low??
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#8
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #8
You know that does seem like a slow mph. Because my car ran 15.2 at 91 when it was bone stock. So it seems like with the smog delete long tubes and h-pipe you should have done a little better than that. How many times did you run. Was that your best MPH??
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Aug 12, 2004
#9
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #9
I ran three times, and all of them were 93.sumthings. 93.69 being the best. I was having a little trouble with the shifts, still not used to the TKO600 so that probably hurt me a lot
 
5

5stang0

New Member
May 3, 2004
27
0
0
Aug 12, 2004
#10
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #10
my first time at Lebanon Valley was...

R/T... .834
60.... 2.384
330... 6.290
1/8... 9.526
MPH.. 75.99
1000. 12.309
1/4... 14.653
MPH.. 96.09

Stock Rubber
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#11
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #11
You ran 14.6 without gears???? Damn that is a killer time if thats only with what you got in your sig.
 
5

5stang0

New Member
May 3, 2004
27
0
0
Aug 12, 2004
#12
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #12
yeh thats without gears, i also dont have the U/D pulleys in. i was pretty happy with that time, considering i also took a WRX that run haha
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Aug 12, 2004
#13
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #13
what would kill my MPH like that?
 
R

red95aodevert

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
64
0
0
Redford, MI
Aug 12, 2004
#14
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #14
I have the same question about low MPH. My latest pass was:
.511 RT
1.964 60FT
5.942 330FT
9.304 1/8 ET
73.16 1/8 MPH
14.651 ET
92.02 MPH

I asked this question in the past but the best answer I got was because I was running 4:10's. M yonly problem with that response is I'm crossing at 4,000 RPM's so I don't think the gears are the problem? If anything I think I shoul dhave 4:30 or higher? I's an AODE vert in full trim so it weighs a ton. My mods are:

4:10's
B&M 3000 stall
1 5/8 shorties
2.5 h-pipe, flowmasters and 3" dumps
UD pullies
JMS custom chip
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#15
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #15
5stang0 said:
yeh thats without gears, i also dont have the U/D pulleys in. i was pretty happy with that time, considering i also took a WRX that run haha
Click to expand...

What kinda tires? Is that with DR's? Im impressed
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#16
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #16
red95aodevert said:
I have the same question about low MPH. My latest pass was:
.511 RT
1.964 60FT
5.942 330FT
9.304 1/8 ET
73.16 1/8 MPH
14.651 ET
92.02 MPH

I asked this question in the past but the best answer I got was because I was running 4:10's. M yonly problem with that response is I'm crossing at 4,000 RPM's so I don't think the gears are the problem? If anything I think I shoul dhave 4:30 or higher? I's an AODE vert in full trim so it weighs a ton. My mods are:

4:10's
B&M 3000 stall
1 5/8 shorties
2.5 h-pipe, flowmasters and 3" dumps
UD pullies
JMS custom chip
Click to expand...

I would say your problem is just the weight. Like you said verts weigh a ton. But good ET though. How do you like that 3000 stall?
 

Stump1000

New Member
Apr 5, 2003
495
0
0
Morristown Tn
Aug 12, 2004
#17
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #17
Its not that far off? If it was real humid it may have just been that. I just run 95mph with the same mods
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 12, 2004
#18
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #18
mystang94gt said:
I would say your problem is just the weight. Like you said verts weigh a ton. But good ET though. How do you like that 3000 stall?
Click to expand...

Verts don't weigh as much as people think. They only weigh a little above 3400 lbs. The only weigh about 100 lbs. over a coupe. Which is only good for about 1/10th in the 1/4.
 
R

raginbul469

Founding Member
Oct 23, 2001
160
0
0
michigan
Aug 12, 2004
#19
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #19
my car ran 14.214 at 96.x when all i had done to it was underdrive pullies.

and i thought it was slow maybe i was wrong?
 

Stump1000

New Member
Apr 5, 2003
495
0
0
Morristown Tn
Aug 13, 2004
#20
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #20
yeah you were wrong. Its hard for everyone to get on here and compare quarter mile times since humidity, heat and elevation has so much effect on it
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
767
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Nice Sn95. 100k miles. Heirloom. Garage kept. We need some help
  • Jacobn4056.
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2024
90sickfox
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?