• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

flow master 40 mufflers and catback tubing

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02'MineralGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 13, 2005
0

02'MineralGT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
43
0
0
Apr 13, 2005
#1
  • Apr 13, 2005
  • #1
For everyone who has gone with flowmaster 40's and gotten tubing elsewhere which tubing did you go with? and where did you get it, prices maybe?? thanks alot.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Apr 13, 2005
#2
  • Apr 13, 2005
  • #2
What tubing? If you are just doing weld ins, continue to use your existing OEM flowpipes, tailpipes.
 
0

02'MineralGT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
43
0
0
Apr 14, 2005
#3
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #3
It's not nessecary to get new tubing? will the tubing from aftermarket catback not flow better than stock?
 
K

kstang69

New Member
Aug 14, 2003
153
0
0
atlanta, georgia
Apr 14, 2005
#4
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #4
yeah new mandrel bent tubing with a good catback will flow better than stock, but it will cost more. weld ins will still flowbetter than stock and i have the 40's welded in, sounds really good to me. think it was bout 225-250 installed.
 
0

02'MineralGT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
43
0
0
Apr 14, 2005
#5
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #5
will the aftermarket tubing not make a difference in sound? is it entirely the muffler?
 
K

kstang69

New Member
Aug 14, 2003
153
0
0
atlanta, georgia
Apr 14, 2005
#6
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #6
im sure there will be some difference, maybe louder but i honestly dont know this one
 

Mirrahasmycar

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
210
0
0
CT
Apr 14, 2005
#7
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #7
the sound is going to change most with the mufflers, I doubt the piping will change the sound, only if you don't have bends in in which is hard, I have my flows welded in and it sounds great, I wouldn't suggest making your own catback, either weld the flows in or break the bank and get the catback, Its just not worth it to make your own and it will most likely cost more or as much as the catback
 
0

02'MineralGT

New Member
Nov 30, 2004
43
0
0
Apr 14, 2005
#8
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #8
does the American Thunder catback use the flowmaster 40's?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
597
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
B
Take a look at my rack!
  • bicknell
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
683
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
Willybill32
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
323
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
512
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?