• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

for those who can't decide 3.55 vs 3.73

  • Thread starter Thread starter remat457
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 29, 2004
#41
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #41
Even with a 28" tall tire and an AOD I need to go down to 3.90's or 3.73's. I run out gear with 4.10's. I agree that a mildly moded motor car will do better with 4.10's. 3.73's are really good for cars that actually drive alot. If you drive a long way 4.10's get old.
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
Jul 29, 2004
#42
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #42
Thats what I'm sayin. 4.10s are GREAT on the streets but on the highway you really should have something to give it a little top end. Then they are perfect. Otherwise the 4.10s really do slow you down at higher RPMs. But most people on here that add gears eventually at a minimum add some sort of Cobra or Edelbrock intake.
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Jul 29, 2004
#43
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #43
I just finished my 3:73 build! Looks like i went with the right set of gears!
 
N

Notch Man

Member
Nov 20, 2003
31
0
6
MD
Jul 29, 2004
#44
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #44
4.10 for me-in an aod!!! no overdrive though
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 29, 2004
#45
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #45
I'm with you guys - 4.10's just take the revs up too high - you become rpm limited before aero threshold is reached. The happy medium for top end is likely 3.55's for most Stangs.
 

remat457

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
587
0
16
Seattle/Tacoma
Jul 29, 2004
#46
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #46
MustangMulch said:
remat- That's crazy. The guy that sold me my car told me it had 3.55's, so i've been thinking i've been driving around with 3.55's this whole time. I just checked it out the other day and I really have 3.08's. Exact opposite of your situation.

I will definitely be upgrading to 3.73's soon.
Click to expand...


That sucks!
hmm...I am amazed that there are so many people that don't know what is in their car
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Jul 29, 2004
#47
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #47
Michael Yount said:
Chris - more rear gear limits top end if you're redline limited already, or if you put a lot of gear in. But that's not the case in most cars. Mentioned it before - Corvette has to downshift from 6th to 5th to reach it's top speed. Most Stangs who go from 2.73's to 3.55's or 3.73's will see an increase in top end - cause they can now get the engine speed up in the rpm range where it's making more power.
Click to expand...

I have 2.73s, so when I upgrade to 3.73s I will have a higher top speed? Man, upgrading from these 2.73 gears is starting to sound better and better
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 29, 2004
#48
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #48
sirsureshot39 said:
As cool as that may sound, it doesnt make u a badass, it makes u a dumbass, sorry to be so blunt, but your going to want/need to run something lower then a 3.55, most likey a 3.27 with that turbo...

www.Turbomustangs.com is your friend
Click to expand...

You may be trying to help and understand that but i do know the difference vs low and high gearing. I have 3.27's sitting if i want to switch. IF the car is not to my liking with 4.10's i will change back to another gear. I'm certainly not going to change them BEFORE the stuff goes on, before i can even make my mind up. like i said i will keep them with the turbo unless its just too wild. then i can be like and once their switched and the rear end is built to withstand the power. even if its for only 1-2 months i'm gonna run it with them to see if i like it.
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
Jul 30, 2004
#49
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #49
anyone here do there own gear swap??? first time???? traction lock (posi) rebuild??? any pointers??? in my opinion they biggest cost is the labor... i might try doing it myself. Everyone had to do it themselves some time or another.. LOL!
 
Z

Zombietime

New Member
May 9, 2004
86
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#50
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #50
tbadair said:
anyone here do there own gear swap??? first time???? traction lock (posi) rebuild??? any pointers??? in my opinion they biggest cost is the labor... i might try doing it myself. Everyone had to do it themselves some time or another.. LOL!
Click to expand...

Another way you can go is to get a whole new rear end with the gear you want already installed. I've seen some nice built 8.8s for less than 800. Sure that's more than a new set of gears and an install but depending on where you go that could cost you 4-500 dollars for everything. I'd rather have a whole new rear end for a little bit more.
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#51
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #51
I have to say, It is pretty sad when someone lacks the intelligence to offer advice without the name calling. I'm better than that, so looks like someone will be first person to added to my ignore list.
Congrats sirsureshot39!
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Jul 30, 2004
#52
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #52
I apologize if I hurt your feelings, I wasnt aware that you were so sensitive. Next time I'll be sure to do a background check before I make a "unintelligent" comment. Thanks, and feel better.

*hug*


PS: your not going to get a "feel" for the car using 4.10s, because your turbo wont have enough time to build full boost or youll be blowing the tires off due to it. When dealing with big power, its "intelligent" to step down your gearing to accomodate for your traction, or lack there of. Especailly when using a power adder such as SC or TC. Hope this helped.
 

Qwk88LX

Member
Dec 1, 2003
202
21
19
Sunrise, FL
Jul 30, 2004
#53
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #53
drgn5.0 said:
I have to say, It is pretty sad when someone lacks the intelligence to offer advice without the name calling. I'm better than that, so looks like someone will be first person to added to my ignore list.
Congrats sirsureshot39!
Click to expand...
you really shouldn't be so sensitive...it's the internet. Plus he did try to give you some advice. All my friends running power adders are using 3.55's or less.
 

DCjuggalo

Member
May 18, 2003
169
0
16
Charlotte, NC
Jul 30, 2004
#54
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #54
i got a question.. does putting higher gears in your car mess up anything, like the torque boxes
 
M

mooktank

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
237
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#55
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #55
why would you absolutely NEED an alum. driveshaft? by the way guys i have some 3.55s in my garage from my truck. should I put them in or just buy 3.73s? As you can see from my sig my car already hauls some ass with 3.55s but im in between gears everywhere. I think i would like 3.73s the best but I alreayd have the 3.55s and im a kid with 2 vehicles and I dont know if i can afford new gears because of college soon.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#56
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #56
sirsureshot39 said:
As cool as that may sound, it doesnt make u a badass, it makes u a dumbass, sorry to be so blunt, but your going to want/need to run something lower then a 3.55, most likey a 3.27 with that turbo...

www.Turbomustangs.com is your friend
Click to expand...
Agreed, turbo's need to be given time to spool up - they don't work the same way a supercharger does.

As for being worried about upping the gear, sure it's fun and all but try running 1800 rpms at highway speeds and then running 2500 rpms - think the extra rpms don't increase wear?
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#57
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #57
DCjuggalo said:
i got a question.. does putting higher gears in your car mess up anything, like the torque boxes
Click to expand...
No, it has nothing to do with that really. Think of a high gear in terms of trying to make it up a steep hill, and then if you go to a low gear in terms of going downhill. All it makes the engine do is help it "step" easier by being able to rev to a certain point with less effort. The other tradeoff is increased rear-wheel hp and torque, but not enough to rip your torque boxes apart - if you do then it was your setup (engine) to begin with.
 

Jester73440

New Member
Jul 14, 2004
45
0
0
Jul 30, 2004
#58
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #58
I have all the Gears everyone needs $145 Shipped to anystate.All gears are motive gear brand new never taken out of the box comes with factory warrenty. From what I'm told there is nothing between 355 and 373 but we do have 390s.
 
T

TheDevil

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
393
0
16
Monkey paw
Jul 30, 2004
#59
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #59
I went from 410's to 355's because I wanted more driveability, more top end, and my first gear was useless with 410's. Im happy with 355s with my mods so far. My truck has 373's but also has the truck geared 5 speed for hauling and towing probably that kinda sucks, the 1st 3 gears wind out way to fast, cant wait to throw a tremec in this baby.
 

remat457

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
587
0
16
Seattle/Tacoma
Jul 30, 2004
#60
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #60
stang2841 said:
damn 3.55's are that soft that u dont know that your driving with them?
Click to expand...

funny but since i thought they were 3.08's i was always afraid of going to 3.55's or 3.73's!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
936
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
902
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?