• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Found the problem with my car. Its strange one.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jesus
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2004

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Feb 7, 2004
#1
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #1
Well, if youll remember I had a horrible outing at the track with my car a week ago. The car just didnt run the times I thought it should. Well, the main problem, as you all guessed, was me. I need more driving time. However, there was the question of why I wasnt able to get the car to chirp the tires on the 1-2 shift. Well, here is what the problem was. Believe it or not, the car just didnt want to run well on 91 octane gas. I have a Steeda T/A set to 13.* The car just hated the 91. I put a tank of 89 in and it was like a new car. Not only can I chirp the tires, but they actually screech for like 1 or 2 seconds on the shift. This week I also had the fuel filter replaced and the fuel injectors serviced (I live in a pretty dusty area) The car is running better than it has in a very long time. The guy up at www.bieberfever.com in Phoenix put my car on a scanner and wasnt able to pull any codes of any kind. He drove the car around a couple times and said it felt strong. When I told him I ran a 15.1 in it he looked really surprised and told me that if he drove it he could gaurentee a 13 something time. He thought the car felt like it should be running mid to low 13's. Another guy there told me he has a 5.0 that runs mid 12's, and even thought he runs 16* of timing his car does not run as well on race fuel. He said my car just wasnt able to burn the 91 efficiently. He also said I need to get some ET streets or some Nitto 555 drag radials, which of course is what you all said. So, the car is fine but the driver needs some practice
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 7, 2004
#2
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #2

Did you try bumping to 15* on the 91?
 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Feb 7, 2004
#3
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #3
I asked about advancing the timing even further, but the guy there who worked on my car didnt think it was a good idea. He says hes seen some people mess up there motors by running more timing. I think the car would be fine, but I also think the car is running great right now so Im going to leave the timing where it is.
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Feb 7, 2004
#4
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #4
Well now what are you waiting for! Take her to the track!!
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Feb 7, 2004
#5
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #5
no **** it was the driver? Man, just get some more track time like we said, I was a ****ty driver a year ago. All it takes is some practice, and just run on street tires for now until you figure it out
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Feb 7, 2004
#6
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #6
Jackie Chan said:
no **** it was the driver? Man, just get some more track time like we said, I was a ****ty driver a year ago. All it takes is some practice, and just run on street tires for now until you figure it out
Click to expand...



Dont talk to Jesus that way!!


 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Feb 7, 2004
#7
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #7
I knew I was the main problem, but I still wanted to find out why the car wouldnt bark second. Having someone look at the car has given piece of mind (and so has barking second). Now I know its up to me to get the car to run the times. Now I have no excuses.
 

krly79

Member
May 6, 2003
464
0
16
VA Beach & So Illinois
Feb 7, 2004
#8
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #8
maybe you should have your A/f ratio looked at. You car will run better the leaner it gets, but it's all fun and games until someone gets a hole burnt in a piston. It seems that it is running too rich with 91, but not lean enough with 87 to through a code or ping. You could have you A/F changed, but then you talking $$$. Just stick with 87, and more $$$ in your pocket. Of coarse you could up your timing a little and go with 91 and I don't think you would have any problems. However, if you get any spark knock or pinging, cut down your timing a little. I think the Steeda T/A is off by 1* on the low side though.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Feb 7, 2004
#9
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #9
could've been just a batch of bad gas
 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Feb 8, 2004
#10
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #10
I actually dont think it was a bad batch of gas because I had made this observation before, and even posted about it, but no one replied. It was a post about running 13* of timing and not needing 91 octane gas. I was trying to find out if this seemed wiered to any one, but no one replied.
 
C

CuddaWuddaShuda

Founding Member
Mar 5, 2002
678
0
0
Feb 8, 2004
#11
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #11
My advice is to put the timing at 15 degrees and run Chevron 91 like most people do. That is a combination that is known to be safe and effective.

Weather and track variations could explain the lack of wheelspin on the 1-2 shift. So could bad gas. You can't say scientifically that your car hates 91 octane, and you're tempting fate IMO to run any extra spark advance without using premium.
 

NiteMareGT

New Member
Feb 20, 2003
300
1
0
Danville,VA. USA
Feb 8, 2004
#12
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #12
Set your timing to 15 degrees, and run the 91. You'll be just fine !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Need help and Advise - 89 Problem Child
  • Sheela
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
155
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
evintho
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
237
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Need help asap
  • shaggyman65
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2025
shaggyman65
S
P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
is my car dead
  • kenzo0315
  • Jun 30, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
kenzo0315
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?