• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Frpp Now Selling 5.4 Dohc Navigator Crate Engine!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tjm73
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#1
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #1
M-6007-NA54 MSRP $4395.00

Let the 5.4 DOHC conversions commence.

 

Attachments

  • M-6007-av46.webp
    183.5 KB · Views: 6,428

Back2Mustangs

New Member
Sep 2, 2004
466
0
0
Jun 14, 2005
#2
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #2
Won't you still have to pull the heads, gut the block and replace all the internals, have the heads worked, install cams, etc etc...? Then replace the whole upper intake if you go w/boost... Seems like you're buying alot of extra stuff you don't need. Unless u just wanna swap motor for motor straight up, but I don't think you'd get your money's worth out of that
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#3
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #3
Back2Mustangs said:
Won't you still have to pull the heads, gut the block and replace all the internals, have the heads worked, install cams, etc etc...? Then replace the whole upper intake if you go w/boost... Seems like you're buying alot of extra stuff you don't need. Unless u just wanna swap motor for motor straight up, but I don't think you'd get your money's worth out of that
Click to expand...


All 5.4's have steel cranks now. So maybe Rods/pistons. But that's not the point. The 5.4 DOHC is not an easy engine to find yet, so having one available as a crate engine is a good thing.
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
Jun 14, 2005
#4
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #4
Weren't they always available as a crate engine? Anyways, you can't beat that price.
 
2

20o2gt

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
6
0
0
Jun 14, 2005
#5
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #5
tjm73 said:
All 5.4's have steel cranks now. So maybe Rods/pistons. But that's not the point. The 5.4 DOHC is not an easy engine to find yet, so having one available as a crate engine is a good thing.
Click to expand...


Thats an awfully big maybe to deal with .. I would have to know DEFINITLEY if i were going to go with boost..
 
J

Justin03GT

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
199
0
0
Mount Pleasant, SC
Jun 14, 2005
#6
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #6
whats the factory HP rating in one of those?
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#7
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #7
Justin03GT said:
whats the factory HP rating in one of those?
Click to expand...

300 hp @ 5000 rpm
355 lbs-ft @ 2750 rpm
9.5:1 Compression
Iron Block
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jun 14, 2005
#8
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #8
tjm73 said:
All 5.4's have steel cranks now. So maybe Rods/pistons. But that's not the point. The 5.4 DOHC is not an easy engine to find yet, so having one available as a crate engine is a good thing.
Click to expand...

true. I never seen wrecked Navigater in Junk yard. I guess if i'm in near Hollywood, there might be crop load of them at local junkyard?
 

Back2Mustangs

New Member
Sep 2, 2004
466
0
0
Jun 14, 2005
#9
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #9
5.4L = 331cu right?

Well, the Iron block is a plus. Steel crank similar to Cobra crank maybe? So you replace the rods n pistons and get the heads and cams done then add a blower... I guess thats not a bad deal...you have to swap computers too or can you flash a GT comp to work with that setup? Hmmm...now you got me thinking...5.4 Nav crate or stay 2V's with a VT long-block and cams??
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#10
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #10
Back2Mustangs said:
5.4L = 331cu right?

Well, the Iron block is a plus. Steel crank similar to Cobra crank maybe? So you replace the rods n pistons and get the heads and cams done then add a blower... I guess thats not a bad deal...you have to swap computers too or can you flash a GT comp to work with that setup? Hmmm...now you got me thinking...5.4 Nav crate or stay 2V's with a VT long-block and cams??
Click to expand...


Close, 329.63 inches (to be exact- 3.55 B x4.165 S) call it a 330. Doubt the heads need to be "done", but cams couldn't hurt.

I'd like to do a Sullivan Performance Carb conversion and put one in a T-Bucket street rod for summer days when I don't want to drive my Mustangs.
 

9646gt

Member
Apr 7, 2005
595
3
18
Holloman AFB,NM
Jun 14, 2005
#11
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #11
I wonder how the configuration of this motor compares to the config of the same motor ford is planning to boost and drop in the gt 500 net year...
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#12
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #12
9646gt said:
I wonder how the configuration of this motor compares to the config of the same motor ford is planning to boost and drop in the gt 500 net year...
Click to expand...

I'm sure the differences are signifigant. Different rods and pistons for sure. Probably a forged crank I imagine too. I doubt they'll do anything different to the heads. Possibly cams, but they say all PI headed engines, whether 4.6 or 5.4, have the exact same cam....so I think they may just run the same cams as a 4.6 DOHC.
 

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 14, 2005
#13
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #13
tjm73 said:
300 hp @ 5000 rpm
355 lbs-ft @ 2750 rpm
9.5:1 Compression
Iron Block
Click to expand...
Call me crazy, but arent those numbers lower than the 4.6 DOHC they have in the mach? For almost an extra litre, i would expect much higher numbers.
anybody know the reasoning behind this?
 

9646gt

Member
Apr 7, 2005
595
3
18
Holloman AFB,NM
Jun 14, 2005
#14
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #14
smokin'Red35th said:
Call me crazy, but arent those numbers lower than the 4.6 DOHC they have in the mach? For almost an extra litre, i would expect much higher numbers.
anybody know the reasoning behind this?
Click to expand...

I would say there are alot of diff in maybe cams and such that would make it seem this way..thats why most are stating that cams and such should be upgraded..
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
Jun 14, 2005
#15
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #15
I would buy the Boss 290 intake from Australia as well as some Cobra R spec cams and you would have one bad ass NA 5.4L.
 

Bornstanger

Uncle 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me'er
Founding Member
Oct 20, 2001
476
0
26
Strongsville, OH
Jun 14, 2005
#16
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #16
tjm73 said:
I'm sure the differences are signifigant. Different rods and pistons for sure. Probably a forged crank I imagine too. I doubt they'll do anything different to the heads. Possibly cams, but they say all PI headed engines, whether 4.6 or 5.4, have the exact same cam....so I think they may just run the same cams as a 4.6 DOHC.
Click to expand...
the GT500 will be using the exact same heads as the Cobra R/Ford GT which are the best flowing DOHC heads ford made period. it will be using the same valvetrain parts too, not too sure if it's the same cams though. pistons and rods will also be from the GT or at least be very similar to them if i'm not mistaken...could be wrong on that though.

calilifestyle said:
I would buy the Boss 290 intake from Australia as well as some Cobra R spec cams and you would have one bad ass NA 5.4L.
Click to expand...
the Boss 290 intake is designed to work with 03/04 cobra heads which have smaller intake ports than navi heads to begin with. you can make more power using a sullivan intake and navi heads.
 
A

artificial HP

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
89
0
0
Jun 14, 2005
#17
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #17
I know the 4.6 PI mustang head is the same as the 4.6 PI truck head....so is it the same with the DOHC heads?
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#18
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #18
smokin'Red35th said:
Call me crazy, but arent those numbers lower than the 4.6 DOHC they have in the mach? For almost an extra litre, i would expect much higher numbers.
anybody know the reasoning behind this?
Click to expand...

The 5.4 DOHC was configured for torque. Look at it's peak torque point. 2750 rpm?!?! Where does the DOHC (non-blown) have peak torque? A lot higher in the power band. Swap that mountain of an intake for a short runner and see what happens. A lot more hp and still more torque for sure.

As for the reason for the very conservative numbers, the 4.6 DOHC has to move a 3500-4000 lbs car. The 5.4 DOHC was setup to move a 5500+ lb SUV.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#19
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #19
Bornstanger said:
the GT500 will be using the exact same heads as the Cobra R/Ford GT which are the best flowing DOHC heads ford made period. it will be using the same valvetrain parts too, not too sure if it's the same cams though. pistons and rods will also be from the GT or at least be very similar to them if i'm not mistaken...could be wrong on that though.
Click to expand...

Are the Cobra R/Ford GT heads the same or different than the FRPP 32 valve DOHC heads? Anyone know? I think they are different.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 14, 2005
#20
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #20
this is not a bad deal.. i am betting a lot of these will be swaped into the modular mustangs as they age.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Supercharger Options 5.4 32V Intech
  • Germangazguzzler
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2025
RaggedGT
Top End Kit or Supercharger?
  • 93gtmustang
  • Feb 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 2, 2024
Bullitt347
Ford Racing Z2363 Crate Engine Build
  • Habu135
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 10 11 12
Replies
233
Views
26K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
from6to8
M
Transmission case cracked: what to replace with?
  • Mikesbaron
  • Aug 9, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 10, 2021
Mikesbaron
M
Q
Foxbody 5.4 4V Build Thread
  • QSACfoxbody
  • Feb 14, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
Metalriff
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?