• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Gas mileage on supercharged stangs???

  • Thread starter Thread starter greatwaster
  • Start date Start date Jan 13, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
G

greatwaster

New Member
May 22, 2009
24
0
0
Jan 13, 2010
#1
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #1
I have 400hp by way of Vortech charger, 42lb injectors, exhaust, custom tune, blah blah.

I am getting 10mpg. As petty as this sounds...I should be getting better then that! What do you get?
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jan 13, 2010
#2
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #2
I get 8, who cares! It is what it is, not an economy car.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jan 13, 2010
#3
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #3
Stop w/the lead foot! These cars are'nt that bad w/ light accelaration! Your computer will adjust to the light driving!
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jan 13, 2010
#4
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #4
400 to the wheels? Do you romp on it alot? Just wondering what to look forward to
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jan 13, 2010
#5
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #5
Mine got better when I added my Vortech on the 96 Cobra. And my 04 is not any worse with the Whipple.
 

BlackArtemis

Dated 4 Amandas. Nothing special. Got the job done
Founding Member
Sep 23, 2002
0
3
49
West Chester, PA
Jan 13, 2010
#6
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #6
Wait, you get 8MPG on a stock Cobra? Jesus...
 

Ateup

Active Member
Sep 21, 2009
748
2
28
Jan 13, 2010
#7
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #7
Holy crap...are you all serious with the 8-10mpg?
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 13, 2010
#8
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #8
A lot of what determines the fuel economy with a blower is in the fine points of the tune. Highway mileage typically drops a little because timing is removed and in-town mileage drops because things like acceleration fuel enrichment are fattened to stave off detonation. If you're running the stock MAF it's likely the thing is pegging before you get to 400rwHP and the tune is conservatively pouring fuel in to prevent detonation. With matching hardware and a careful tune you can recover at least some of that fuel economy.

If you regularly beat on it and actually access some of those ponies you're going to see ****ty gas mileage. If you baby it, you'll do better. I think mine does something like 24MPG on the highway (110KPH, A/C off, cruise set...) and 12-14 in the city. The problem for me is that while I always have good intentions of "taking it easy" to improve economy, I always end up blowing it and having fun with it whereupon is proceeds to guzzle gas. And to be honest, that's why I have the blower in the first place...it's fun

My 1.8T VW GTI is my DD/fuel mileage car...
 
G

greatwaster

New Member
May 22, 2009
24
0
0
Jan 13, 2010
#9
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #9
24mpg? How in the world?!?!? I do have a Lighting MAF and 3.73 gears. 406hp to the pavement. Seems slow now...

But I get 10 - 12
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 14, 2010
#10
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #10
greatwaster said:
24mpg? How in the world?!?!? I do have a Lighting MAF and 3.73 gears. 406hp to the pavement. Seems slow now...

But I get 10 - 12
Click to expand...

Couple of things:

Remember, you're only making 400HP to the wheels with the throttle wide-open and at high RPM. On the highway, the throttle is barely cracked and the engine is loafing at 2000RPM. My best mileage of 24 was on the highway. It takes only nominally more power to push your car along at 65MPH (or whatever) now than it did before the blower. The extra power is now going into driving the supercharger though because it's essentially freewheeling (manifold is in vacuum) and takes only a few HP, if that, to drive in that condition. So adding a blower doesn't -- or shouldn't -- automatically decimate highway economy. Of course if you keep your foot in it on the highway YMMV.

If you're getting 10-12 on the highway I'd suggest you start looking for fuel leaks or something. I don't really see how a computer-controlled fuel system could be dumping that much unnecessary fuel into the engine (to give such crappy highway economy) without all sorts of error codes being set unless the tune is set for open-loop or something...

Around town is different. I never got great mileage in-town before the blower and now it's worse, mainly because it's a hoot to get on it ... not to extremes but every 1/2- or 3/4-throttle burst dumps a bunch of gas in, especially on a PD blower like mine. In addition, I'm using Kenne Bell's "chip tune" and the stock MAF which is a very safe combo but probably not optimized. One day I'll go Lightning MAF and get a proper dyno tune and that might help.
 

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Jan 14, 2010
#11
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #11
im getting around 14 with 4.10's
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jan 14, 2010
#12
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #12
i can pull in the 20's with my car on the mid 600 tune. the 0.50 OD helps a lot with mine
 

patman0911

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
2,287
0
46
Tuscaloosa, AL
Jan 14, 2010
#13
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #13
I wonder about you supercharged guys - some of you suffer only a minor drop in mileage while others get hosed on it. I wonder if different tuners are doing different things with part-throttle tunings? Are some tunes running open-loop all the time and running rich in all conditions in the name of a "safe tune"?

What Trinity is saying makes sense, there should be some drop-off because of the added load on the motor and the ability to ingest considerably more gas at full throttle, but if you stay out of boost, mileage shouldn't drop that much, certainly not down near single digits.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jan 14, 2010
#14
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #14
Absolutely right, but that is the difference in a PD blower and a centri. The Vortech/Paxton/Procharger guys can stay under 2.5k RPM's for the most part and actually either gain or break even MPG wise. I think the guys with the KB's/Whipple's/Tork Tech are the ones that have been having issues, in addition to the major variable, the tune that is on the car.

The answers that everyone gave are right, but there are so many variable to go in between to be right about everyone!
 
M

Midnight2V

Member
Jan 30, 2009
224
0
16
Oklahoma
Jan 14, 2010
#15
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #15
If it's all highway miles, I can get better than 30, in town around 23. Thats assuming I don't get on it at all. On a track, I'll burn a tank in one night of test and tune.

If all you do is red light stomp, rinse and repeat, you are going to get horrible results. Your engine needs X amount of fuel to make Y horsepower. Your average car built after 1990 takes less than 20hp to overcome rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag to move at 70mph down the highway. When you use all 400 thirsty ponies to smoke your tires for 400 feet from light to light to light. Your fuel economy will be slightly reduced.

Your engine is a glorified air pump, if you want more fuel economy you can do two things:
Run it at something less than maximum power, reduce your pumping losses or both. That means get your foot out of it and your head into it.

Practice responsible driving habits, limit yourself to one blast per car ride for example.

It's kinda cool that reducing air restrictions will nearly always result in increased maximum performance. Port your heads, get well designed cams, use an exhaust that provides scavenging, and get a secondary economy tune programmed for normal commuting.

Yes, positive displacement blowers use more fuel - Specifically twinscrews because they are always doing work...even off throttle. One of the hallmark designs of a twinscrew is the male and female rotors that when rotated together create internal compression (compression within the housing of the blower). This means that even when not generating boost, twinscrews are doing work. Few roots, and no centrifugals have internal compression, and when not in boost, are simply windmilling.

That being said, superchargers will be a load on the engine at all times if for nothing else than the friction from spinning them. People who see an increase after installation probably have their tuner to thank for optimizing their air/fuel ratios - which from the factory are pretty conservative.
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Jan 14, 2010
#16
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #16
I recently made a road trip. I drove consistently between 80-85mph and i got 20MPG. If i'm doing a combo of city/hwy and driving it HARD but not WOT all the time, i get avg of 17MPG.
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jan 14, 2010
#17
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #17
spederman said:
I recently made a road trip. I drove consistently between 80-85mph and i got 20MPG. If i'm doing a combo of city/hwy and driving it HARD but not WOT all the time, i get avg of 17MPG.
Click to expand...

Centrifugal?
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Jan 15, 2010
#18
  • Jan 15, 2010
  • #18
32ValveRom said:
Centrifugal?
Click to expand...

yes, Vortech S trim
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 15, 2010
#19
  • Jan 15, 2010
  • #19
It's all about the tune and your driving habits. My 2.3 has a ****ty tune that rarely goes to closed loop, and my driving is basically to the track and back. I get 9-10mpg on E85. Given a manual tranny and a good tune, I could probably get that back up to 25 though.
 
G

greatwaster

New Member
May 22, 2009
24
0
0
Jan 16, 2010
#20
  • Jan 16, 2010
  • #20
I am going to check for fuel leaks tomorrow. Something isn't right. I noticed today that I can smell fuel when making a hard turn to the left.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
367
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
236
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Fuel Vortech Supercharger injectors
  • Dontknowchit
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 8, 2026
from6to8
Vortech V3 Si - Bypass Valve to BOV swap issues
  • seanmahoney
  • Jun 26, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
598
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 26, 2025
seanmahoney
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?