• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Going from 3.08s to 3.73, should I feel a big difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomCat
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
May 13, 2005
#1
  • May 13, 2005
  • #1
Like the title says, I'll be putting in some 3.73s soon and I was wondering what kind of improvements I should hope to see. I don't think the jump from 3.08s is that much, so I'm keeping my hopes very reserved What are you're opinions on 4.10s? I hear that it wouldn't be very efficient for daily driving.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 13, 2005
#2
  • May 13, 2005
  • #2
I'll be a huge difference. I went from 3.08 to 3.55 to 3.73 and each change was very noticable.
 

Umby

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
129
0
0
Atlanta, GA
May 13, 2005
#3
  • May 13, 2005
  • #3
You'll be grinning for ear to ear the first time you have to peel yourself off the seat
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
May 13, 2005
#4
  • May 13, 2005
  • #4
Awesome
I'm gonna go ahead with it then...
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 13, 2005
#5
  • May 13, 2005
  • #5
I'm gonna have to take the next step and suggest 4.10s. I've got the same trany you've got listed in your future plans, and with a 4.10 my car is an animal, and my engine is mostly stock.
 

Curse

Member
Apr 8, 2004
791
2
16
El Paso, TX
May 13, 2005
#6
  • May 13, 2005
  • #6
I did and my car was an auto. Before the swap I could barely break the tires on a launch, not with the 3.73s and a 5 speed I can go through 1st,2nd and 3rd
 

302GT

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
81
0
0
Carson City,Nv.
May 13, 2005
#7
  • May 13, 2005
  • #7
I noticed a huge diff going from 3.08's to 3.73's.You'll love em.It will be a totally different car.
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
May 13, 2005
#8
  • May 13, 2005
  • #8
big difference, especially for your adrenalin
 

accidentprone86

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
189
0
0
Westminster Colorado
May 13, 2005
#9
  • May 13, 2005
  • #9
what about 3.08S to 3.55s?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 13, 2005
#10
  • May 13, 2005
  • #10
Yep I would suggest staying away from 410's...go with the 373's
 
G

grrrrrrr

New Member
May 20, 2003
289
0
0
norfolk, VA
May 13, 2005
#11
  • May 13, 2005
  • #11
you're going to love them...
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
May 13, 2005
#12
  • May 13, 2005
  • #12
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I'm gonna have to take the next step and suggest 4.10s. I've got the same trany you've got listed in your future plans, and with a 4.10 my car is an animal, and my engine is mostly stock.
Click to expand...
Yeah I was thinking about that... How's the cruising RPM? I do a bit of highway driving. But yeah I can get the 3.73s right now and at a really good deal I can't wait!
 
J

jaackal

New Member
May 12, 2003
402
0
0
NJ
May 13, 2005
#13
  • May 13, 2005
  • #13
TomCat said:
Yeah I was thinking about that... How's the cruising RPM? I do a bit of highway driving. But yeah I can get the 3.73s right now and at a really good deal I can't wait!
Click to expand...

i read on here a while ago that there is only a couple hundred rpms at highway speed between 3.73 and 4.10
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 13, 2005
#14
  • May 13, 2005
  • #14
TomCat said:
Yeah I was thinking about that... How's the cruising RPM? I do a bit of highway driving. But yeah I can get the 3.73s right now and at a really good deal I can't wait!
Click to expand...


I run about 2500 @ 65mph on 265/50/15s, which are shorter in height than stockers, so if you've got 17s it'll be a tad less. It just depends on what you want to do with your car....sometimes i miss being able to go 150mph, but the fun of going 0-60 quicker is more appealing to me, since you hardly ever get to use anything 70mph and up.
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
May 13, 2005
#15
  • May 13, 2005
  • #15
I would go with 4.10's if it was an auto. 3.73's do a great job on manual.
 

future303

New Member
May 3, 2005
8
2
1
May 13, 2005
#16
  • May 13, 2005
  • #16
4.10's must be a killer in hwy mileage
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 13, 2005
#17
  • May 13, 2005
  • #17
future303 said:
4.10's must be a killer in hwy mileage
Click to expand...

I get 14-16 per gallon with a 650 double pumper carb, it just depends on how fast i go and how many imports i pass. In contrast, my '98 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 automatic gets a steady 16mph with a stock 3.55 gear.
 

cjman15

Banned
Apr 15, 2004
1,009
0
0
Fairfield, PA
May 13, 2005
#18
  • May 13, 2005
  • #18
You will love the gears. 3.73s or 4.10s...
 

70lightning

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
205
0
0
in the basement makin stuff
May 13, 2005
#19
  • May 13, 2005
  • #19
The first time you hit the gas pedal, you will piss your self.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
May 13, 2005
#20
  • May 13, 2005
  • #20
yup i did it over the winter and i was amazed. the only down side is that first gear is almost unusable n/c it goes through the rpm band so much quicker from 3.08s
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
I feel like I'm chasing my tail with this thing
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 23, 2023
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Apr 12, 2024
LILCBRA
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Stiffer front springs writeup from the old .net site
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 29, 2022
Enzio
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?