• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Going from 3.08s to 3.73, should I feel a big difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomCat
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
May 13, 2005
#21
  • May 13, 2005
  • #21
No, you'll feel a slight difference and thats it. 4.10s would give you a give jump. In my opinion a 4.10 with a 3550 is too steep for driving around. Have you thought of getting 3.90s?
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
May 14, 2005
#22
  • May 14, 2005
  • #22
Naw I haven't looked at other options. 2500 at 65 isn't too bad at all actually...but I'm kind of afraid of what grey5.0beast said about 1st gear. I'll look into 3.90s and all that right now.
Thanks for the replies,

Brandon
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 14, 2005
#23
  • May 14, 2005
  • #23
Go with 373's or 3:55’s on a daily driver (that is my suggestion)...I'll put some info for your gear selection decision. If your worried about "hurting" anything the 373's will technically be better for you over the 410's...

373's will be more daily driver friendly and if you get boost/nitrous later you won't run out of gear at the track and you will have less traction problems. Some that have actually had both gears were slower at the track with 410's over 373's and some also claimed no seat of the pants difference.

I run 2400 rpm at 70mph (I have 373's)…the 410’s will run higher closer to the 2600-2700rpm range with the 245/50/16’s I have on my car.

Here is how I look at when picking gears for a daily driver...To me the gearing of 410's or steeper on a daily driver is not worth it to me...you get worse gas mileage/more engine wear/and use your shifting components more (clutch/trans/etc)...around town...and I also look at it like this...when your cruising on the highway at 80mph (interstate) your cruising at roughly 3000rpm with 410's...that is HALF your 302's revving capabilities and that is in the overdrived 5th gear at CRUISE...not at WOT...I personally don't like the idea of having half the engines revving capabilities at just cruise. Also...what if an emergency comes up and you got to "get it"...you have to be there for someone or are running to the hospital...and running higher than 80mph...maybe running 4500rpm steadily (faster than 80mph of course)...during that emergency I don't think that would be a good time for your engine to let go on you...what do you think?

Then you have to factor in 410's or steeper cause my engine braking at higher rpms on the highway...go pull out somewhere and hold your car to 2500rpm or so (worse with gears) and feel the engine try to slow you down when you let off the gas...same similar occurance happens on the highway/interstate plus the wind resistance.

I know when I had the slipping clutch problem I could smell the clutch burn at a higher rpm cruise which in my case was comparing 2000rpm to 2500rpm. At the lower rpm I didn’t smell it but the higher rpm I could smell it. Just some things to think about when you think you want every little tenth out of your car (4:10’s)…I prefer a better overall performance personally…

Go 373's...I would rather want more (373's to 410's) than get to much (410's) and want less (373's)...get what I'm saying?

There will also be less drivetrain shock under traction with 373's over 410's...

The problem with 410's in an AOD is you only have 3 gears to work with at the track (effective gears anyways) and the gears will get you out of those gears quicker and you could lose your gearing powerband at the track.

Also if they were to convert to a t5 (pretty popular actually) then they are "stuck" with the higher revving 410's...I hate the "winding out" sound on the highway with a gear like that...

On the listing of "pros/cons" of a mod like gears. I have stressed that in a couple choice threads, for example on shorty vs. longtube headers. Longtubes will get a better midranging power over the shortys (so the pro is more power) but some forget to mention the cons of it which are buying a matching mid-pipe (more money and aren't able to use the stock mid-pipe) along with ground clearance issues (especially on a lower car) and also the difficulty of install is "stepped up" quite a bit when trying to get longtubes in. It also can cause heat-soak issues and steering column clearance/rubbing issues. The potential purchaser has to ask themself is the extra midrange worth it? Then you get your answer...

So I ask...are the 410's (a tenth or two quicker at track to a matched combo over 373's) worth it? (more engine/drivetrain wear/worse gas mileage/and a couple other "cons" listed above in my post)...again the potential driver/purchaser has got to ask themselves what they want

willys1 (member on this site) actually was slower at the track in his bolt-on car with 410's than he was with 373's...

To often people go "drive" a friend's car with gears and go have fun in the car and don't drive it normally or thing of longterm effects with normal driving. They often just use their SOTP meter to determine what gear they want but when a final gear ratio effects all different parts of you and your car...I think it is best to not try a gear ratio "drag strip style" but "daily driver style"...

I have rode and drove in every car except one with 4:56’s and I see easily how the 4:10’s and especially 4:30’s are overkill for a daily driver. One trip on the interstate will let you know…

Also on the 200rpm difference (I actually think it is a bit more) but to put that into perspective since I ride at 2400rpm at 70mph I run 2600rpm at 80mph but that is a "big" difference in the feel of the car. Just as well you will be even more limited with the 410's pushing nearly 3000rpm just at cruise Every time I drive on the interstate with the 373's I just can't imagine having 4:10's

Again good luck with your choice
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
May 14, 2005
#24
  • May 14, 2005
  • #24
wow, thanks for the long post! I've decided that I'll just go with the 373s. I was wondering why all the AOD peeps were going with 4.10s and now it all makes sense. I do need my cruising rpms so I guess that's the deciding factor...
They should be in by a weeks time.

Thanks to everyone for the input, it really helps =)
 

Must-Be-A-Stang

New Member
Sep 26, 2004
66
0
0
Enid Oklahoma
May 14, 2005
#25
  • May 14, 2005
  • #25
All I know is I went from 2.73 to 4.10 and I loooove it! I don't know why people say don't get 4.10s. I get about 10 per gallon in town and 13 or 14 on the highway. It dose run higher RPMs but if you do the speed limit it is really not bad. 2nd gear is like 1st gear but I still use 1st gear while driving. But as soon as you hit the gas, hold on cause your gonna spin! I love em. .02
 

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
May 14, 2005
#26
  • May 14, 2005
  • #26
The only thing I felt is the car rev higher..did'nt really feel a HUGE difference. Noticable but not huge...But thats just me and my slow stang!
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
May 14, 2005
#27
  • May 14, 2005
  • #27
I've got a good solution for the AOD guys; I can't believe no one has noticed it yet. I took my car from 2.73s, completely stock to 3.73s, which was a phenomenal change. Instead of going 4.10s, I got the FRPP wide ratio kit (it's $655.95, but I got mine for $100 used off eBay), and it does double duty. Not only is the trans. nearly unbreakable, but since 1st is changed from 2.43 to 2.84, it gives the launching characteristics of 4.56 gears, but the highway cruising of 3.73s! Combine it with a good shift kit, good converter and the FRPP valve body, and you have one extreme transmission. At shift point in first (6500 stock-tach RPM), my car gives a violent jerk as you're shifting, and gives off a pretty good screech. It shifts HARD.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
I feel like I'm chasing my tail with this thing
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 23, 2023
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Apr 12, 2024
LILCBRA
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?