stang8urimport Autozone Junkie Founding Member Jun 21, 2002 1,499 12 59 Daytona Beach, FL Aug 9, 2006 #21 Aug 9, 2006 #21 Biggest KDWs come in are 255/40/17. Not the correct height for the rears and will throw the speedo off. I agree the KD's are one bad ass tire, but very expensive also. I might try them on my next set of tires, but that's not for a couple years.
Biggest KDWs come in are 255/40/17. Not the correct height for the rears and will throw the speedo off. I agree the KD's are one bad ass tire, but very expensive also. I might try them on my next set of tires, but that's not for a couple years.
F foxstang9050 New Member Aug 23, 2005 158 0 0 El Doarado Hills, CA Aug 9, 2006 #22 Aug 9, 2006 #22 the KDW nt... which i gave the link for your right only has the 255... but the actual KDW.. similar looking to the KD... you can go bigger.... http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/fi...tpc=MTAHZ9&tp=Passenger/Performance&tc=MTAHZ9 Your right about the price though... EXPENSIVE
the KDW nt... which i gave the link for your right only has the 255... but the actual KDW.. similar looking to the KD... you can go bigger.... http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/fi...tpc=MTAHZ9&tp=Passenger/Performance&tc=MTAHZ9 Your right about the price though... EXPENSIVE
stang8urimport Autozone Junkie Founding Member Jun 21, 2002 1,499 12 59 Daytona Beach, FL Aug 9, 2006 #23 Aug 9, 2006 #23 Yeah, I know about the NT (or KDW 2's), but the original KDWs are sorta pointless. They're good, don't get me wrong... but if you're going to pay that much, just step up to the KDs
Yeah, I know about the NT (or KDW 2's), but the original KDWs are sorta pointless. They're good, don't get me wrong... but if you're going to pay that much, just step up to the KDs
F foxstang9050 New Member Aug 23, 2005 158 0 0 El Doarado Hills, CA Aug 9, 2006 #24 Aug 9, 2006 #24 +1 for KD