• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

GT 40 Heads Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter crunchie12268
  • Start date Start date Dec 24, 2004
C

crunchie12268

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
599
0
0
Manhattan, KS
Dec 24, 2004
#1
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #1
Okay when I bought my car the guy said that it had GT40's, all I can see is they are painted orange, but is there any way to verify this? Also, I really need to know the kind of spark plugs these things use. Can I just say I need the plugs for a 93 Cobra? Don't they have the GT40's?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 24, 2004
#2
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #2
They should say GT right near the front of the head near the spark plug hole, head bolt hole below the valve cover rail.

Yes the 93 Cobra had the cast iron GT-40's you could ask for them with no issues at all.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 24, 2004
#3
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #3
Another way to check too - look on the ends of the heads where the accessory brackets bolt up -- there will be 3 parallel bars cast into it. 4 parallel bars indicate GT40-P's.
 
C

crunchie12268

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
599
0
0
Manhattan, KS
Dec 24, 2004
#4
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #4
It says GT on the front so thats good. It also has the bars so thats good... I am using the NGK TR55 and that is what the cobras use so the plugs are the rights ones. I checked my plugs, and they have about 3000 miles on them and they are a little tanish yellow like on the ends, then there is a little green, and also on the bottom of the tip there is some green... what does that mean... good? I also have an MSD 6AL and Blaster 2 Coil, the gap is at about .045.... is that good for a high output igintion?
 

Ourobos

Member
Apr 12, 2004
260
1
17
Dec 24, 2004
#5
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #5
That all sounds good. Make sure you don't TRY the bosche platinums with those heads.. (Sux0rs)
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 24, 2004
#6
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #6
With the higher powered ignition, set the gap as large as you can with it still running good. Stock is .054 -- you ought to be running AT LEAST that much with the MSD. I'd set 'em at .060" and see how it runs. As long as the igntion system can manage the gap - the bigger the gap, the bigger the spark and the more of it that is exposed to combustible mixture.
 
C

crunchie12268

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
599
0
0
Manhattan, KS
Dec 24, 2004
#7
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #7
thats what I thought, and thats why I asked, in my manual it said .044, then the plugs were .054 out of the box. Could this be dampening my performance?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 24, 2004
#8
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #8
I doubt it'll make a BIG difference if that's what you're looking for. But the big energy ignitions are there so you can make a big fat spark jump a bigger gap. Open those puppies up to about .060" and see what happens.
 
C

crunchie12268

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
599
0
0
Manhattan, KS
Dec 24, 2004
#9
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #9
Michael Yount said:
I doubt it'll make a BIG difference if that's what you're looking for. But the big energy ignitions are there so you can make a big fat spark jump a bigger gap. Open those puppies up to about .060" and see what happens.
Click to expand...


Im on my way
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 25, 2004
#10
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #10
Rick 91GT said:
They should say GT right near the front of the head near the spark plug hole, head bolt hole below the valve cover rail.

Yes the 93 Cobra had the cast iron GT-40's you could ask for them with no issues at all.
Click to expand...

I thought the 93 cobra came with GT-40 Ps?????? if not which cars came with the P's?? thanks
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 25, 2004
#11
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #11
No Matt - 93-95 Cobras all came with cast iron GT40's. Only the Explorers and Mountaineers of later production came with the GT40P's. The head was changed as emissions regs even for the trucks became tighter - the P's combustion chamber burns more efficiently and cleaner than the 40's.
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 25, 2004
#12
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #12
thanks michael--you da man!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
461
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
443
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
403
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?