• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Headers??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69Rcode_Mach1
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 8, 2004
#1
  • May 8, 2004
  • #1
Hey guys summers almost here and im getting ready to do my performance mods, but first i need highflowing exhaust. I don't know what headers to go with. Should I go with hedman or hooker? I need maximum performance gains. I plan to run it with a crossover system.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 8, 2004
#2
  • May 8, 2004
  • #2
what car?

what engine?

what mods?



Im always a fan of hooker super comps
 

NorCal66

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
334
0
0
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA HOME
May 8, 2004
#3
  • May 8, 2004
  • #3
It's gonna be a personal taste thing between those 2 brands. But I'm with carfan on this one, the supercomps are nice.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 8, 2004
#4
  • May 8, 2004
  • #4
Sorry for a lack of info. I need to make a signature. It's a 1969 Mustang Mach1 with 351 Windsor and power steering. I plan to do concours down the road with it but for now i figure ill do performance. So when i get older and can afford a concourse ill put the originals back on.
 
A

A66Auto

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
113
0
0
Sacramento, CA
May 8, 2004
#5
  • May 8, 2004
  • #5
Can someone tell me the difference between Hooker Comp and Hooker Super Comps? I can't tell the difference. Also does anyone have those in their 66 with a 4 speed? I was looking in the PAW catalog and the little notes show that they need special motor mounts. Does that make sense to anyone?

THanks
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 8, 2004
#6
  • May 8, 2004
  • #6
i think the difference between the super comps and comps is the length? super comps are equal length?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 8, 2004
#7
  • May 8, 2004
  • #7
Supercomps are lighter.
That is good and bad...
They make them lighter by using thin metal. They are technically not a street item.
Also, they are either tuned length or equal length... not sure exactly which.
Depending on what engine you are working with, the Supercomps sometimes have larger primarys than the Comps.
In the end, there is not much difference between LT headers power-wise.
Good luck
Dave
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 9, 2004
#8
  • May 9, 2004
  • #8
So should I go with the comps? My car will be a street car, but with around 400 flywheel horsepower hopefully. Will the supercomps make that much of a difference. What would the cost for a set of ceramic coated comps. I was thinking hedman elites.
 
C

candy-a-Mach1

New Member
Nov 13, 2002
291
0
0
Kentucky
May 9, 2004
#9
  • May 9, 2004
  • #9
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
So should I go with the comps? My car will be a street car, but with around 400 flywheel horsepower hopefully. Will the supercomps make that much of a difference. What would the cost for a set of ceramic coated comps. I was thinking hedman elites.
Click to expand...

Ha ! I've been trying to decide for a month, with the same application.
$259 for the ceramic coated Hedman Elite, $505 for the ceramic coated Super Comp's.

I think that I'm going with the Hedman. I know that you get what you pay for, but I'm not sure that the ground clearance and installation issues are worth the 10 HP.

Sure would like to heard from someone with a 69/70 with a 351W Auto Tranny !!!
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 9, 2004
#10
  • May 9, 2004
  • #10
Me too, especially from someone that has put an AOD in as well. Clearance issues?
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 9, 2004
#11
  • May 9, 2004
  • #11
Yeah im thinking im going to go with the hedman elites for the price sounds more practical. Im confused though they are sold in pairs right? Will it fit my 1969 351 W and fmx transmission. And should i go with straight pipe? I need power producing exhaust, but the car has to sound mean and loud as hell. I want sleeping children to wake up when i drive by.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
May 9, 2004
#12
  • May 9, 2004
  • #12
i think all of the elite series headers will fit automatics, you will need the power steering drop bracket to fit any long tube. i have hedman shorties and absolutely love them, no need for a drop bracket with them either. if you really want it loud i would go with a 2-1/2" mandrel bent exhaust system with an h pipe and 2 chamber flow masters. an x pipe will get you a little more power but will be slightly quieter than an h pipe. i've read some header reviews and most show that the shorty headers produce slightly more top end power but lose some low end torque to the long tubes. what are the specs for 351 you are building? if you're motor is going to a torque monster you might consider the shorties over the long tubes as the loss of low end torque will be minimal, but the top end power you'd gain might be a good trade off
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 9, 2004
#13
  • May 9, 2004
  • #13
I don't know what performance im doing for sure, but i need the torque. I was planning on edelbrock victor jr. heads, a new cam, longtube headers with the mandrel bent 2.5", i just don't know what mufflers to use or if i should just straight pipe it. Right now my car hits a pitiful 155 horsepower at the wheels . I am at 5000ft elevation, but i hope this will get the car to 400 hp at the flywheel. I just want to kick the crap out of any sti's or wrx's that come my way all the kids are drivin those these days.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 9, 2004
#14
  • May 9, 2004
  • #14
When it comes to mufflers, the 2 chamber Flows are loud. Both in and out of the car. I kept a set of Flows and a set of turbos that I would switch in and out occaisionally when the drone got old. Turbo type mufflers sound good in the car, but are not nearly as aggressive as chamber types outside.
Then there is always the tried and true glasspack type... It has a distinct sound and can drone in the car like chambers, but if you go with a good design, it will outflow anything less than open headers. Something like DynoMax Race Bullets flow like open pipe, and they are very inexpensive. Lesser glasspacks, like cherry bombs, have small internals and flow obstructing fins, so you have to do a little looking for a good set. Then again, I just named the best bullet type for you... DynoMax Race Bullet. They come in sizes from 2.5" to 4" and 12" to 18" bodies. If I was building a 2.5" system, I would get a set of 24219 bullets, 3", and cone the ends up/down to 2.5" pipe. That would slow the exhaust flow inside the muffler, taming the sound a tiny bit and insure totally free flow. That part is around $40 each from Summit or Jegs.
Good luck
Dave

Edit: The other good thing about bullets is that they are super lightwieght and take up very little space.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
May 9, 2004
#15
  • May 9, 2004
  • #15
candy-a-Mach1 said:
Sure would like to heard from someone with a 69/70 with a 351W Auto Tranny !!!
Click to expand...
Max Power said:
Me too, especially from someone that has put an AOD in as well. Clearance issues?
Click to expand...
I posted this just the other day but it was asked for again. This is not a 69/70 but the engine compartment and transmission tunnels are the same as my '67. These are ceramic coated Hedmann Elites on a 351W with an AOD behind it. Plenty of room for aftermarket rack and pinion and also plenty of ground clearance.








 

Attachments

  • randpsmall1.webp
    115.9 KB · Views: 104
  • randpsmall2.webp
    111 KB · Views: 105
  • randpsmall3.webp
    120.2 KB · Views: 106
  • randpsmall5.webp
    108.6 KB · Views: 103

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 9, 2004
#16
  • May 9, 2004
  • #16
Very nice! Thanks.

I'm kinda leaning towards shorties for the 393 I am building though.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 9, 2004
#17
  • May 9, 2004
  • #17
I agree that is a very nice looking engine compartment. Will the hedman elites be okay with power steering though??
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
May 10, 2004
#18
  • May 10, 2004
  • #18
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
I agree that is a very nice looking engine compartment. Will the hedman elites be okay with power steering though??
Click to expand...
Yes, you'll need the PS 1" drop bracket just like you will with every long-tube I've ever used. You could do a rack-and-pinion and avoid that though
 
C

candy-a-Mach1

New Member
Nov 13, 2002
291
0
0
Kentucky
May 10, 2004
#19
  • May 10, 2004
  • #19
"These are ceramic coated Hedmann Elites on a 351W with an AOD behind it. Plenty of room for aftermarket rack and pinion and also plenty of ground clearance."

Wow....those look great.

Makes me glad that I ordered a set this morning!! Hey, maybe my luck is changing
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
May 10, 2004
#20
  • May 10, 2004
  • #20
A66Auto said:
Can someone tell me the difference between Hooker Comp and Hooker Super Comps? I can't tell the difference. THanks
Click to expand...

One difference is that the Super Comps hang lower to the ground at the collectors. Personally, I prefer the Comps primarily for this reason if it's a street car.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
502
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
641
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
245
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
833
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
710
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?