• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Heres a good one for you guys.

  • Thread starter Thread starter justinschmidt1
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Feb 13, 2008
#21
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #21
justinschmidt1 said:
Why would I be any more at risk than a Pi guy running 10 psi at 400 whp
and me running npi heads and cams with 14 psi at 400 whp?
Click to expand...

In that scenario you are creating a considerably more heat because of the added boost. You could probably get away with it if you pull timing way way down but why not just get a bigger pulley and be able to have more room to play with the timing.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Feb 13, 2008
#22
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #22
jstreet0204 said:
In that scenario you are creating a considerably more heat because of the added boost. You could probably get away with it if you pull timing way way down but why not just get a bigger pulley and be able to have more room to play with the timing.
Click to expand...


What would I be better off doing? running 10-12 psi?

or 13-14 with less timing?

I will be intercooled
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Feb 13, 2008
#23
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #23
justinschmidt1 said:
What would I be better off doing? running 10-12 psi?

or 13-14 with less timing?

I will be intercooled
Click to expand...

Less boost will create less heat so it will over all be safer.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Feb 13, 2008
#24
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #24
jstreet0204 said:
Less boost will create less heat so it will over all be safer.
Click to expand...

What about power?

Would I make the same power with 10-11 or 13-14 with less timing?
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Feb 13, 2008
#25
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #25
justinschmidt1 said:
What about power?

Would I make the same power with 10-11 or 13-14 with less timing?
Click to expand...

You are gonna have so to sacrifice some power if you want to keep it safe. That's just the nature of it. You won't know how much you'll make either way until you start tuning it. It all depends on how much timing you can run at each boost level. Every set up will be a little different.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Feb 13, 2008
#26
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #26
just run 10-11 lbs like everyone else and dont worry about the internals. why risk it if you're so worried about the bottom end?
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Feb 13, 2008
#27
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #27
The only benefits you will see with a smaller pulley is more power, how much is unknown though, and it will build boost quicker. Like I said earlier though, 10-12psi is about the max for these motors if you want reliability out of them. If you got the money for a built motor and have another car to drive if your Stang blows then by all means add more boost but if you don’t you need to stay on the conservative side. Just because you make another 25-30rwhp with the smaller pulley isn’t worth risking your motor.

I forgot what did you have for a fuel setup that will play a factor in the safety of the blower too.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Feb 14, 2008
#28
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #28
ive got ford 42lb injectors, 90 mm LMAF, walbro 255 in tank fuel pump.

Intercooled, dyno tuned to 11.5-12 A/F I would assume
 
T

TonyG

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
200
0
17
Owings Mills, MD
Feb 14, 2008
#29
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #29
I once made a post about losing 2 psi after my LT header install. Everyone was telling me that they've never seen that happen. So I investigated and found a leaky vacuum line to my pressure gauge (happened during the install).

Once that was fixed, I got my 2 psi of boost back.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Feb 14, 2008
#30
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #30
jstreet0204 said:
Yeah that's what I was getting at. Just because you make the engine breath a little better and the boost goes down, doesn't make it safe.

Hell you can run 30lbs of boost safely on the stock block if you run a tiny ass throttle body and choke the engine down. Boost is just a measure of the restrictions, not total air flow.
Click to expand...

Not on pump gas you wont...remember boost presure is measured inside the plenum. You would effectively still be pressurizing the intake plenum with 30PSI and filling the heck out of the cylinders....hello detonation and blown head gasket!

Basically intake manifold restriction, head restriction, cubic inch, cam shaft design, and exhaust flow have more to do with how boost effects the filling of your cylinders. If anything a smaller TB will reduce boost seen and then as a result airflow.

I do agree with your point though...cylinder volume and static running compression under full boost (whatever that may be) are really what determine how much stress your engine is actually under. Higher boost comes with higher heat....so generally lower boost is safer, even if your making the same power.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
347
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Forced Induction Vortech v3 low boost (like 2 psi)
  • 92Rustang
  • Jul 29, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 2, 2025
Mindseye007
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Stand alone vs chip tune (for noob)
  • nicholase
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?