• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

How does a bolt-on 4.6 2V compare to a stock 350Z?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chimchim
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

chimchim

New Member
May 14, 2004
267
0
0
PA
May 12, 2006
#1
  • May 12, 2006
  • #1
Let's just say I came up next to one at the track today. It seemed as though I smoked him from 70-100. Then, he gave me the ricer fly-by and I let him go up to what appeared to be about 150. I kept waiting on the po-po to show up, but no luck there. Anyway, cruising along, we both looked and knew what was happening and I bet I put 4 cars on him 70-100. Maybe it was an auto or he wasn't paying attention??? Anybody got any stories with 350s???

MODS: lock this down before someone realizes it's a street racing thread.
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
May 12, 2006
#2
  • May 12, 2006
  • #2
with your mods you should beat one in a race, but it would own you in the curves.

They are pretty much a drivers race with a stock 99-04 GT 5 speed in the 1/4. They are a good overall sports car. I would own one if I had the extra cash for a 25K second car.
 
C

chimchim

New Member
May 14, 2004
267
0
0
PA
May 12, 2006
#3
  • May 12, 2006
  • #3
04DarkShadowGT said:
with your mods you should beat one in a race, but it would own you in the curves.

They are pretty much a drivers race with a stock 99-04 GT 5 speed in the 1/4. They are a good overall sports car. I would own one if I had the extra cash for a 25K second car.
Click to expand...
haha no curves. Just straight "race track" today. They do look amazing.
 
E

exindust

New Member
May 8, 2004
329
0
0
Moorpark, CA
May 12, 2006
#4
  • May 12, 2006
  • #4
they looks fat is what they look
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
May 13, 2006
#5
  • May 13, 2006
  • #5
97gtblue on here ran one that had almost no mods at a 350Z dyno day here in town, ran from a 20 roll and canned the 350Z. 97 GT has 3.73's, offroad h, flowsmashers, pulleys, filter. It was a few cars at least.
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
May 13, 2006
#6
  • May 13, 2006
  • #6
Oh and I dont think they look too special, there is a LARGE group of them around here and 80% of the owners are douchebags. One of the BIGGEST tools around has a twin turbo one, he only races from 65 rolls lol.
 

javsvt

Member
Jun 10, 2005
27
0
7
Westchester County NY
May 13, 2006
#7
  • May 13, 2006
  • #7
I dont like them, they are quick but Id rather have a Infinty G35 coupe. They look so much better. A little more cash and a little slower, but Id rather have that. I also think my 03 Gt looks better than a 350z .
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
May 13, 2006
#8
  • May 13, 2006
  • #8
03 GT > 350Z

Damn right!
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
May 13, 2006
#9
  • May 13, 2006
  • #9
The older models it's a drivers race in stock form, but the new 298 hp? ones are trouble. i'm going to have to say the 350.
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
May 13, 2006
#10
  • May 13, 2006
  • #10
Stang|ess said:
The older models it's a drivers race in stock form, but the new 298 hp? ones are trouble. i'm going to have to say the 350.
Click to expand...


Agreed

This is a common thing on these board.. the lack of knowledge between the older and newer 350's


The older 350's would be close but the new ones put cars on stock mustang gt's.
 

ToplessStang

Member
Mar 7, 2004
591
0
17
Montreal, Canada
May 13, 2006
#11
  • May 13, 2006
  • #11
Stang|ess said:
The older models it's a drivers race in stock form, but the new 298 hp? ones are trouble. i'm going to have to say the 350.
Click to expand...


The newer models also have less torque and more weight. Performance is pretty much equal to the earlier models.
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
May 13, 2006
#12
  • May 13, 2006
  • #12
ToplessStang said:
The newer models also have less torque and more weight. Performance is pretty much equal to the earlier models.
Click to expand...


Have you actually experianced this "equal" performance?


I have other experiances with both the older and newer models.. with the newer model being a much faster car.
 
G

gargol139

New Member
Nov 23, 2005
38
0
0
Mesa, Arizona
May 13, 2006
#13
  • May 13, 2006
  • #13
I just happened to be getting on my car the other night next to a brand new 350z, and he got on his and I had him by about a 1/2 a car to a car.
 

ToplessStang

Member
Mar 7, 2004
591
0
17
Montreal, Canada
May 14, 2006
#14
  • May 14, 2006
  • #14
WillDuhhBeast said:
Have you actually experianced this "equal" performance?


I have other experiances with both the older and newer models.. with the newer model being a much faster car.
Click to expand...


I've been racing my best friends z weekly for about 3 years now. I've only seen the 300 hp Z at the track once to be honest. Guy ran a 14.2. Then again, the numbers don't lie.


The new Z has:

13 hp more
14 lbs of torque less
125 lbs of weight more

According to you that equals "a MUCH faster car". Ok.

Not to mention that in every test I've read on the new Z the performance numbers are pretty close to the older version.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
May 14, 2006
#15
  • May 14, 2006
  • #15
ToplessStang said:
I've been racing my best friends z weekly for about 3 years now. I've only seen the 300 hp Z at the track once to be honest. Guy ran a 14.2. Then again, the numbers don't lie.


The new Z has:

13 hp more
14 lbs of torque less
125 lbs of weight more

According to you that equals "a MUCH faster car". Ok.

Not to mention that in every test I've read on the new Z the performance numbers are pretty close to the older version.
Click to expand...
numbers don't lie
math makes the world go 'round...
i'd think the loss of tq would negate the hp gains. what do those weigh in at? Its one of the only new cars i have not driven yet. I have driven the G35 M6 and that was fun.
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
May 14, 2006
#16
  • May 14, 2006
  • #16
Well you can go by numbers if you'd like.


I'd like to think real world experiances take presidence.


Go, and find out yourself.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
May 14, 2006
#17
  • May 14, 2006
  • #17
i have driven a lot of z's the 300hp version is no faster from what I have seen. stock for stock they are a good 1/4 race, but they tend to pull away at higher speeds. mod for mod, good competition. and when your car gains 13 peak hp and loses torque, its not " alot faster "
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
May 14, 2006
#18
  • May 14, 2006
  • #18
The newer Zs are no faster than the low hp version stock, but they do respond better to mods. They are a higher revving engine and like boltons, where the older version didnt do much when you added boltons.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 15, 2006
#19
  • May 15, 2006
  • #19
Let's not stereotype drivers. I have seen good and bad from each driver of many different cars and trucks.

Also, handling is very similar.

A 350Z will beat a stock 98 and down gt...you just have to have a good driver. A 99+ car will usually get the win by a bit, with a good driver. The Mustang has the advantage, slight.
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
May 15, 2006
#20
  • May 15, 2006
  • #20
Watched a slew of them dyno one day, some stock ones did more than bolton cars LOL. 226-240 rwhp seemed about on par if I remember right. The one my friend raced made 226 or 230 or something.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread Daily Driver.... 89 GT - Front suspension rebuild
  • TIGGER
  • Apr 4, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
186
Views
27K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
TIGGER
P
*HELP* How to identify if I bought a PI or NPI 4.6 2v engine?
  • pollock_209
  • May 7, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 10, 2019
wmburns
K
New to me 1966 convertible
  • kimrpaige
  • Feb 28, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2019
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?