• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

how much spray can the plastic intake take?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaroonMustangGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 9, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

MaroonMustangGT

New Member
Apr 25, 2005
33
0
0
Jan 9, 2006
#1
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #1
gonna order a vt short block and planning on running a 200 shot. can the plastic pi intake take it? or do i need to go bullet?
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Jan 10, 2006
#2
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #2
Might as well just do the Bullitt swap and avoid the "damn.. why didn't I just do the swap" thing later.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jan 10, 2006
#3
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #3
That's awhole lotta spray.
I've sprayed 150 3 times and wasn't real excited by it. I think JayC does 150, sometimes.
 

zerosgt

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
50
0
0
Sea-Tac, WA
Jan 10, 2006
#4
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #4
On the topic of spraying, I'm running a 98 GT and I would like to run a 50 shot from a NOS wet kit. How will this affect my bone stock GT? What all do I need to do to give this car the highest reliability?
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jan 10, 2006
#5
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #5
zerosgt said:
On the topic of spraying, I'm running a 98 GT and I would like to run a 50 shot from a NOS wet kit. How will this affect my bone stock GT? What all do I need to do to give this car the highest reliability?
Click to expand...
a 50hp wet shot???
might see 2 tenths in the 1/8 reduction. Not 100% sure never sprayed that lil amount.
Most beleive up to 100hp shot isn't really gonna affect it too much. Of course if your spraying ALL the time then it could.
If your wanting to stay with that low a shot you may want to look into a dry kit instead.
 

zerosgt

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
50
0
0
Sea-Tac, WA
Jan 10, 2006
#6
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #6
Nice, pardon the freaking newbie question, but what would be the difference in installation between a wet vs. dry kit?
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jan 10, 2006
#7
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #7
zerosgt said:
Nice, pardon the freaking newbie question, but what would be the difference in installation between a wet vs. dry kit?
Click to expand...
Wet you need to tap into your fuel line, dry you don't.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jan 10, 2006
#8
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #8
I don't think it is the amount of nitrous used that kills the intake, it's back fires caused by puddling. I'm ot nitrous expert, but I think i'd invest in a nozzle system to avoid the puddling before I'd invest in a bullitt intake.
 

todd4566

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,075
0
36
California
Jan 10, 2006
#9
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #9
zerosgt said:
On the topic of spraying, I'm running a 98 GT and I would like to run a 50 shot from a NOS wet kit. How will this affect my bone stock GT? What all do I need to do to give this car the highest reliability?
Click to expand...

I'm with ya. I've never played with nitrous before, and I'm not thinking of going with a 50 or 75 shot - DRY.. just something to have fun with every so often when getting on the highway. My only concern is that I'd probably use the nitrous so seldom, that it may not be worth the hassle come summertime (having to remove the bottle frequently and such).
 

98blackmagic

New Member
Jun 2, 2005
386
0
0
wouldnt you like to know
Jan 10, 2006
#10
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #10
Before I ever run nos on my car, I think I would go ahead and invest in a good intake for my car, and try to elimate the problem of haveing to fix it after its already broke. Especially if you plan on hitting the giggle gas on a regular basis .
 

QU!CK

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
146
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Jan 10, 2006
#11
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #11
You can run a 300 shot but don't expect to use it more than once

Try it twice and you'll be on the road side sweeping up the legos, er, intake manifold peices


-J
 

zerosgt

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
50
0
0
Sea-Tac, WA
Jan 10, 2006
#12
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #12
Well here's the deal. My buddy put a wet system in his Supra, and took it out because he wanted to break into the 9's without NOS. So he's going to part with it for $200 to me. So I need to get some additional pieces and find out exactly what I need to hook it up before hand. This is something I'm interested in only if it doesn't leave me walking. What do you think, deal, or not worth it?
 

VicRattlehead

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2000
519
0
0
ChiTown Il
Jan 10, 2006
#13
  • Jan 10, 2006
  • #13
50 wet shot......



its not the amount of nitrous, its the amount of backfire thats the killer


btw

zerosgt READ THIS!!!! http://tccoa.com/articles/misc/Nitrous/N2O-FAQ.shtml

IMO, if your even thinking about any N2O you HAVE to have some sort of computer program in place to work with it.
 

FordMuscle

Banned
Dec 19, 2002
69
0
0
California
Jan 11, 2006
#14
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #14
Guys, let's get all the facts out on the table.
First of all the plastic composite 4.6 2V intake manifold has known defects. Ford just settled a class action law suit regarding the intakes failing/cracking at the seams due to heat. Read more on that here:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/blog/ford-settles-manifold-lawsuit/


Secondly, in any NOS system, wet or dry, a backfire can destroy the manifold...and anything else that cant hold the pressure. This could be the air box, the air ducting, and sure even a piston or head gasket.

However, in a wet system, where fuel is running through the plastic intake, you have another problem...and that is incompatibility of the compositie material and gasoline. Those intakes were never designed to carry fuel. Fuel makes the plastic brittle, and sure over time it can become weak and crack.

I've run a 150 shot on my 01 without issues, but I don't use the NOS often.

I think if I ever wanted to use it repeatledly I would step up to a aluminum intake. Professional products is introducing one in a few months:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2005/10/EditorsCorner/index2.php

FYI, this article is must read if you haven't done NOS on a mod motor:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2004/09/NitrousWorks/index.php
 

Attachments

  • lead.webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 209

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jan 11, 2006
#15
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #15
FordMuscle said:
Guys, let's get all the facts out on the table.
First of all the plastic composite 4.6 2V intake manifold has known defects. Ford just settled a class action law suit regarding the intakes failing/cracking at the seams due to heat. Read more on that here:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/blog/ford-settles-manifold-lawsuit/


Secondly, in any NOS system, wet or dry, a backfire can destroy the manifold...and anything else that cant hold the pressure. This could be the air box, the air ducting, and sure even a piston or head gasket.

However, in a wet system, where fuel is running through the plastic intake, you have another problem...and that is incompatibility of the compositie material and gasoline. Those intakes were never designed to carry fuel. Fuel makes the plastic brittle, and sure over time it can become weak and crack.

I've run a 150 shot on my 01 without issues, but I don't use the NOS often.

I think if I ever wanted to use it repeatledly I would step up to a aluminum intake. Professional products is introducing one in a few months:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2005/10/EditorsCorner/index2.php

FYI, this article is must read if you haven't done NOS on a mod motor:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2004/09/NitrousWorks/index.php
Click to expand...
All true stuff there.
Zero- If it's a got a bottle, working solenoids it's worth that much. You may have to do some research and order jets but that is the only thing I can think of off the top of my head.
 

Attachments

  • lead.webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 241

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 11, 2006
#16
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #16
jstreet0204 said:
I don't think it is the amount of nitrous used that kills the intake, it's back fires caused by puddling.
Click to expand...


what he said.
 

zerosgt

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
50
0
0
Sea-Tac, WA
Jan 11, 2006
#17
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #17
Wow, you guys are really on top of it. I'm looking into upgrading my intake anyhow (due to it's lame abilities). So would it be better to do a dry kit to avoid the fuel eroding the plastic intake? I'm really not keen on the dry idea.

Any other manufactures that make aluminum intakes for the non-PI heads 4.6 or do I have to do that upgrade as well?
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 11, 2006
#18
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #18
The plastic intake is not the real issue with nitrous. They are cheap and easy to replace. The real issue with nitrous is not to burn up one or more pistons due to running lean. IMHO a wet kit is best because you are spraying both nitrous and fuel and with a good tune you should be OK with up to 150 shot I believe. Above this, it starts to get risky.

The intake issue comes into play if you get fuel puddling in the intake resulting in a fuel explosion in the intake. This will definitely destroy a plastic intake but I have also seen it destroy a Bullitt intake and a MAF meter. Fuel puddling is more likely with a wet kit, but I would rather buy an intake than an engine.

If I was going to run nitrous, I would get a wet kit and buy several used plastic intakes and stock MAF meters as spares. This would be much less expensive than a Bullitt intake that you might blow up anyway.
 

zerosgt

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
50
0
0
Sea-Tac, WA
Jan 11, 2006
#19
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #19
jimfitzgerald said:
The plastic intake is not the real issue with nitrous. They are cheap and easy to replace. The real issue with nitrous is not to burn up one or more pistons due to running lean. IMHO a wet kit is best because you are spraying both nitrous and fuel and with a good tune you should be OK with up to 150 shot I believe. Above this, it starts to get risky.

The intake issue comes into play if you get fuel puddling in the intake resulting in a fuel explosion in the intake. This will definitely destroy a plastic intake but I have also seen it destroy a Bullitt intake and a MAF meter. Fuel puddling is more likely with a wet kit, but I would rather buy an intake than an engine.

If I was going to run nitrous, I would get a wet kit and buy several used plastic intakes and stock MAF meters as spares. This would be much less expensive than a Bullitt intake that you might blow up anyway.
Click to expand...

Sounds like good advice. I still want to drop an aluminum intake in it, just because. I found a company that's putting one together and I told them I'd be a tester with a Nitro kit. Let me know what you think.

http://www.hiperformancesolutions.com/index.html
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 11, 2006
#20
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #20
zerosgt said:
Sounds like good advice. I still want to drop an aluminum intake in it, just because. I found a company that's putting one together and I told them I'd be a tester with a Nitro kit. Let me know what you think.

http://www.hiperformancesolutions.com/index.html
Click to expand...
I would not buy anything unproven. Also, just for your information...

N2O = nitrous oxide
NOS = Nitrous Oxide Systems (a company)
Nitro = nitromethane
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
564
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
814
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
M
2001 v6 heater hose quick connect question
  • mnky99
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
550
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 26, 2025
mnky99
M
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
716
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
J
1986 LX 3.8 Convertable. Is it worth trying to sell or junk it?
  • JJacobs
  • Jun 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
367
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?