• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How much would the stock cam hold me back?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DmnStr8
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2005

DmnStr8

Member
Apr 16, 2005
0
0
16
NH
Dec 7, 2005
#1
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #1
Proposed engine would have:

gt40 irons, mild port job
cobra intake with lower port matched to heads
1.7 RR
65mm 0r 70mm TB
shorty headers w/ off road H and flows

I was thinking of sticking with the stock cam for ease of the swap (I'm a real newbie and the cam swap looks to be one of the more complicated parts) to cut some costs and to keep streetability. But I am curious as to just how much it would be holding be back. Any ideas?

I'm hoping for 260RWHP.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Dec 8, 2005
#2
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #2
The stock cam isn't a restriction until you get some really good flowing heads and look for power above 5500 RPM
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Dec 8, 2005
#3
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #3
DmnStr8 said:
Proposed engine would have:

gt40 irons, mild port job
cobra intake with lower port matched to heads
1.7 RR
65mm 0r 70mm TB
shorty headers w/ off road H and flows

I was thinking of sticking with the stock cam for ease of the swap (I'm a real newbie and the cam swap looks to be one of the more complicated parts) to cut some costs and to keep streetability. But I am curious as to just how much it would be holding be back. Any ideas?

I'm hoping for 260RWHP.
Click to expand...

if the engine is near 100K miles , do yourself a favor and atleast install a new timing set while you are doing the work , and my opinion is if you are going to tear it apart that far , you might as well put a cam in it unless you have speed density and just dont wanna mess with converting it to mass air ....
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 8, 2005
#4
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #4
Don't port match the intake to the heads - won't gain you 1HP I'd venture to say..........now, after porting the heads or getting better flowing heads - then think about porting.....
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Dec 8, 2005
#5
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #5
Car Craft used a degreed stock camshaft with AFR 165 and a stealth intake with a 625 Demon on stock bore 302 to get 405 crank HP at like 6100 rpm. If the combo is right it's not a restriction at all.

http://carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford/
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Dec 8, 2005
#6
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #6
stock cam would be ideal for that setup IMO

you might get a little more top end by switching to an e-cam, but id say you'll lose a little low end grunt as well


check out tmoss's setup, he's got basically the same thing with headers, his heads are prepped with ported intake running 277 at the wheels


btw- nice budget setup tmoss
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 8, 2005
#7
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #7
2002BLGT said:
if the engine is near 100K miles , do yourself a favor and atleast install a new timing set while you are doing the work , and my opinion is if you are going to tear it apart that far , you might as well put a cam in it unless you have speed density and just dont wanna mess with converting it to mass air ....
Click to expand...

:Word:
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
Michigan
Dec 8, 2005
#8
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #8
A cam change isn't as hard as you think it is. You are right there with the rest of your mods anyway. Like everybody else said you won't gain anything by changing out the stock cam.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Dec 8, 2005
#9
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #9
tjm73 said:
Car Craft used a degreed stock camshaft with AFR 165 and a stealth intake with a 625 Demon on stock bore 302 to get 405 crank HP at like 6100 rpm. If the combo is right it's not a restriction at all.

http://carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford/
Click to expand...

Everyone that owns a 5.0 should read that article
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?