• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is it worth getting a King Cobra clutch for a stock engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88 Fox GT
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2005

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 24, 2005
#1
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #1
Just as the title asks. I found a King Cobra clutch kit for $170. I definitely am in need of a new clutch, but is it worth paying the extra little bit for the King Cobra? What benefits do I get besides the advertised 10% less pedal effort?

http://mustangtuning.com/kingcobra.html
 

Greenfive-oh8

New Member
Oct 10, 2004
30
0
0
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Aug 24, 2005
#2
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #2
I got one, i have a relatively stock motor, I like it, it is easier on your leg, i got one because i thought my clutch was out and was the reason i had to grind in order to get into first and reverese, turns out i just needed a clutch cable/quadrant there goes 800 dollers
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Aug 24, 2005
#3
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #3
Speed_Demon1965 said:
Just as the title asks. I found a King Cobra clutch kit for $170. I definitely am in need of a new clutch, but is it worth paying the extra little bit for the King Cobra? What benefits do I get besides the advertised 10% less pedal effort?

http://mustangtuning.com/kingcobra.html
Click to expand...
Excellent choice for a stock or mildy modded engine. It holds more power and doesn't slip. It has just enough give to prevent you from quickly destorying your T5 if you don't abuse it a lot.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#4
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #4
You get more holding power (allows you to add more power without slipping) and it is a lighter pedal than a FMS HD for sure. I had one...nice clutch!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 24, 2005
#5
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #5
Nice choice for a bolt on driver! Good price too. Its a tad less pedal effort than a regular fmd hd clutch. My promotion modified/blueprinted fms hd pressure plate is about the same pedal effort as a king cobra fyi. You don't neec to spend the cash for my clutch though. King cobra is a good choice for you.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#6
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #6
Just pay the extra $10 bucks or whatever (maybe $20) and get the King Cobra over the FMS HD. There is a considerable difference in the pedal effort in the few I have tried in others cars. All consistently the same...they hold the same power. Just a bit more of a cost for the King Cobra that is well worth it unless you like to go thru a workout when you drive your car daily
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 24, 2005
#7
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #7
I was talking about the promotion modified/blueprinted fms hd press plate NOT the stock fms hd plate. Like I said, the pedal effort is about the same or a hair LESS than a standard king cobra. The promotion modified plate WILL handle more power and rpm over the promotion modified king cobra. (This is from promotion, not my words ) But we're talking the regular press plates, then the main difference is pedal effort. I daily drove a fms hd for over 50k miles and I had a king cobra for a year after than. Slightly less effort, but not that much. This is comming from someone who isn't big at all
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#8
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #8
Grn92lx - Yes I know. I responding to the first statement of "Its a tad less pedal effort than a regular fmd hd clutch." That is what I responding to.

I'm comparing King Cobra clutch setup and FMS HD setup. Nothing else changed. Both being compared straight of the Ford Motorsport box. Fair comparison that way A quite noticeable difference. Anyone would notice

I'm bigger (6 foot 3 at 205lbs) and I still like pedal effort but not what the FMS HD provides...
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 24, 2005
#9
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #9
You're a big dude. Does your head hit the roof?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#10
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #10
Grn92LX said:
You're a big dude. Does your head hit the roof?
Click to expand...

Surprisingly no it doesn't. Though I do feel tall in it when seated
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 24, 2005
#11
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #11
Alright, sounds like I will go ahead and buy it. I'm sick and tired of my clutch slipping like a bitch, making it accelerate like a 4 cyl. :damnit:

Thanks guys!
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Aug 24, 2005
#12
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #12
If you're not out launching on stickies at 6000rpm and powershifting the bejeezlus out of it, I'd put a stock replacment in it.

Now, my stock clutch took over 200 hard runs launching anywhere from 5000-6250 depending on track conditions, on dr's and ET Streets , and it sctatched both sets of tires on every shift. The only reason it got replaced was a bad burnout lane director got me on dry pavement and gave me the go sinal... dropping the hammer on ET Streets with 9.5psi in them is not good on clutches.

I say save money and run a stock clutch in it.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Aug 24, 2005
#13
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #13
Stock clutch kits did used to be 100 bucks. Valeo makes good stuff IMHO (OEM for many Italian exotics, etc).

A cobra clutch (not KC) is a slight step up from there.

The KC is a step up from that IMHO. The third is as good as anything. I agree with David choice wise (that was my recollection about the pedal effort differences too).

Good luck.
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 24, 2005
#14
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #14
cleanLX said:
If you're not out launching on stickies at 6000rpm and powershifting the bejeezlus out of it, I'd put a stock replacment in it.

Now, my stock clutch took over 200 hard runs launching anywhere from 5000-6250 depending on track conditions, on dr's and ET Streets , and it sctatched both sets of tires on every shift. The only reason it got replaced was a bad burnout lane director got me on dry pavement and gave me the go sinal... dropping the hammer on ET Streets with 9.5psi in them is not good on clutches.

I say save money and run a stock clutch in it.
Click to expand...
Stock clutch kit cost me $140 when I bought one for the T-5 in my '65.
So, for $30 more, I can have this KC clutch which is a far better clutch with less pedal effort.
 

ram360

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
2,162
1
59
Pennsylvania
Aug 24, 2005
#15
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #15
Speed_Demon1965 said:
So, for $30 more, I can have this KC clutch which is a far better clutch with less pedal effort.
Click to expand...

exactly, go for it. You won't regret it. It's a hard clutch to beat for the price.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#16
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #16
HISSIN50 said:
Stock clutch kits did used to be 100 bucks. Valeo makes good stuff IMHO (OEM for many Italian exotics, etc).

A cobra clutch (not KC) is a slight step up from there.

The KC is a step up from that IMHO. The third is as good as anything. I agree with David choice wise (that was my recollection about the pedal effort differences too).

Good luck.
Click to expand...

Yeah we have similar thoughts on some things

I bought a stock clutch Valeo replacment from Napa for $15x dollars. I could get the King Cobra for $20 bucks more

I have had the regular "cobra" clutch too. I have had 4 different clutches myself and drove several others.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Aug 24, 2005
#17
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #17
I've got an OEM-style replacement unit in mine (was put in when converted from AOD to T-5) and it's okay, but it doesn't grab as quick as it should when shifting fast/hard. (RPM's don't jump or hover, it just isn't as snappy.) My previous '89 notchback had the HD clutch kit (not the KC) and that thing was a BEAST to try to shift around town. I stated walking with a limp the first week and felt like my left leg was bigger than my right after a couple of months of driving that thing. But it never, ever, EVER gave the slightest hint of slippage or weakness. I'll be putting in a KC in my current '89 notch when it comes time for replacement (probably next year), as I don't miss the freaky bulging calf muscles on one side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
624
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
'96 Cobra: A/C gets weak and engine misfires under load when warm
  • jruhnke
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
321
SVT Tech Forum Nov 20, 2025
nickyb
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?