• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Largest Rear Nitto Drag Radials That Fit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 331_mustang
  • Start date Start date Mar 17, 2008
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 17, 2008
#1
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #1
Hi. Looking to find out the largest Nitto drag radials any of you guys are running on the rear.

I haven't finalized my wheel decision yet, so I'd like to hear from guys running either 18x10 or 17x10.5 wheels.

Pics would be a great help.

And any description of mods (i.e. reverse the quad shock, wheel spacers, etc.) you had to do to accomodate the width.

Thanks guys!
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Mar 17, 2008
#2
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #2
I don't know Nitto's sizes off hand, but I'd imagine a 315/30/18 or 315/35/17 would be the widest you could fit. It typically does require flipping, or removing the quad shocks in order to have enough clearance.

Edit: I'm gonna toss this one in tech, since it's bordering on asking what mods are necessary to accomodate the additional width of the tires.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 17, 2008
#3
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #3
Im running 315's on a 17X10.5 rim. Nitto's usually run smaller the 315's fit fine w/ no rubbing issues. Im not sure how wide of a rim you would need for 355's or if Nitto even makes them.


View attachment 326295

View attachment 326296

View attachment 326297
 
D

dans89lx

New Member
Jan 23, 2007
46
0
0
Mar 17, 2008
#4
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #4
ive seen 335's i believe they were with no issues on our cars. i am not sure however if they flipped the quads. like it was said above, the nitto's run pretty narrow compared to others.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Mar 17, 2008
#5
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #5
The Nitto 315/35-17s are 12.125" wide. I have mine on 17x11 wheels
 
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 18, 2008
#6
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #6
Great info guys, thank you.

So, no wheel spacers necessary? and I assume you're all running 2 1/2" or larger tail pipes? Eyeballing it, aside from the quad shocks, it seemed like the pipes might be next to hit.

The Nitto's do appear to be smaller in width. I'll have to check out the stats on some typical street tires, and maybe compare with other drag radials (M/T and BFG).

Speaking of BFGoodrich... what gives with the pattern on their new drag radial? What the hell is that all about?
 
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 18, 2008
#7
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #7
Anybody running 18" Nitto's?

I'm thinking 305/35R18 if I go the 18" route.

Nitto stats list those as 12.4" wide versus the 17" 315's at 12.13. Not noticeably wider, but they taller at 26.42" versus 25.79 respectively, so I wasn't sure if the height would add any additional clearance issues.
 
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 18, 2008
#8
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #8
Methodical:

I have the ARE Torq Thrust II's now and can't wait to get rid of them. I love the look, but I spend a day polishing them, only to have them haze up again after the first car wash. My car is garage kept/barely driven and the shine never lasts no matter how often I polish them. You have the same issues?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 18, 2008
#9
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #9
331_mustang said:
Great info guys, thank you.

So, no wheel spacers necessary? and I assume you're all running 2 1/2" or larger tail pipes? Eyeballing it, aside from the quad shocks, it seemed like the pipes might be next to hit.

The Nitto's do appear to be smaller in width. I'll have to check out the stats on some typical street tires, and maybe compare with other drag radials (M/T and BFG).

Speaking of BFGoodrich... what gives with the pattern on their new drag radial? What the hell is that all about?
Click to expand...

No, no spacers and Im running 2.5 pipes. Just a question, why do you want to run Nitto's?
 
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 19, 2008
#10
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #10
Well, I've had them for a few years and I've been really happy with the performance/traction of the drag radial. I've had several other high dollar street tires and they just don't cut it. I noticed a significant difference with the Nitto drag radial.

That said, based on some recent comments I've read through various threads, I'm begining to give the Mickey Thompson's drag radials some serious considerations.

I've noticed they seem to be sized slightly larger, and getting some good reviews for traction.

Thoughts Redline?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 19, 2008
#11
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #11
331_mustang said:
Well, I've had them for a few years and I've been really happy with the performance/traction of the drag radial. I've had several other high dollar street tires and they just don't cut it. I noticed a significant difference with the Nitto drag radial.

That said, based on some recent comments I've read through various threads, I'm begining to give the Mickey Thompson's drag radials some serious considerations.

I've noticed they seem to be sized slightly larger, and getting some good reviews for traction.

Thoughts Redline?
Click to expand...

If you try the Micky Thompson's just once you will realize just how garbage Nitto's are when it comes to drag radials. Im speaking from using both. Nitto's will never touch my car again once I buy new rubber.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Mar 19, 2008
#12
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #12
Redline_351R said:
If you try the Micky Thompson's just once you will realize just how garbage Nitto's are when it comes to drag radials. Im speaking from using both. Nitto's will never touch my car again once I buy new rubber.
Click to expand...


What are the differences? What is it that you like more about the MTs over the Nittos?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 19, 2008
#13
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #13
Methodical said:
What are the differences? What is it that you like more about the MTs over the Nittos?
Click to expand...

They are so much more sticky then Nitto's they dont even compare. If your using Nitto's just for the street thats fine b/c they are cheap even though some street tires will grip just as well but they are expensive. As far as the track goes they are not even in the same league. You can just dump it w/ the MT ET Streets and they hook HARD, try and dump Nitto's and enjoy the 1st and second gear spin cycle.
 
M

miller92063

Member
Oct 12, 2005
253
0
16
Nebraska
Mar 21, 2008
#14
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #14
I have 305/35/18's. There is a piece of metal inside the well that i had to bend. just two wacks with the hammer and problem solved!!
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Mar 21, 2008
#15
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #15
The BFG's hook well too. 315/35-17. Just dont expect alot of mileage. They are MUCH larger than the Nitto and barely fit a 10.5 rim without too much distortion.

 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Mar 21, 2008
#16
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #16
The Mickey T's are the bomb, but I believe they are illegal in some DOT classes. I wouldn't expect more then 10K miles on them in street use.

You can run pretty much any 315/35/17 on 10.5 inch rims if you are using the stock suspension.

Adam
 
3

331_mustang

New Member
Aug 1, 2005
21
0
1
Mar 21, 2008
#17
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #17
[/QUOTE]


Matt, those tires look wicked under there. What wheels are you running? Do you have a side shot of your car?
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Mar 21, 2008
#18
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #18
AFS 10.5 Cobra R Clones

Some pics after a good bit of use







 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 21, 2008
#19
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #19
thats one phat tire
 

SVTCobra306

New Member
Oct 22, 2005
170
1
0
Ft. Bragg, NC
Mar 23, 2008
#20
  • Mar 23, 2008
  • #20
Got those too, look for pics on my cardomain site. My BFG DR II's are very wide for a 315, they bulge a bit on my 10.5" wheels. I had to pound a bit on the inner fenderwell where it meets the rear subframe (not hard) and I haven't had quads in years so no idea if they would have fit or not. Also had to bend my flowmaster tailpipe hangars just a bit to keep the pipes from rubbing.

However they hook! One burnout on the street and everything sticks to them, air them down to 14 or 15 PSI at the track and they used to almost bog my old nitrous 306...

Not to mention the steamroller look is baaad! I like 'em, I'll replace them with another set when these are gone!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
393
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
90
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2026
Mustang5L5
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
418
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
725
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?