• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Lugnut torque specs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nuar
  • Start date Start date Dec 5, 2003

Nuar

Founding Member
Apr 16, 2002
570
0
16
NB, CT
Dec 5, 2003
#1
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #1
I need to put on the winter wheels already, and I was just wondering what is the propper torque that I should use to tighten up the lugs...

Anyone got a quick answer?
Thanx guys.
 

MT1083

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
1,033
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Dec 5, 2003
#2
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #2
I've always been told to just tighten them the best that you can. I actually asked that question awhile ago and nobody gave me a proper torque.

edit: I just searched some threads and it seems like 90# would be fine.
 

Jinx

I like cats, cats like me. Cats and I fully agree.
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 2, 2003
12,166
4,237
223
Cat Country
Dec 5, 2003
#3
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #3
I was told about 90 to 100 ft.-lbs. That's what I have mine set at and I have no problems when it comes time to take them of by hand.
 

Routs

Member
Aug 10, 2003
144
2
19
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Dec 5, 2003
#4
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #4
Yeah, as long as you tighten them with the bar that came with the car you will be fine. Whatever you do, don't use an impact tool. I've seen some people stranded on the highway because the idiots at the shop they brought it to tightened them with a high powered tool.

Makes you wonder who the "tools" really are...
 
0

01'TRUE BLUE GT

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
4,984
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA.
Dec 5, 2003
#5
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #5
I always heard 95-100lbs. is good. I usually go with about the middle of that and torque mine to 98lbs. I haven't had any trouble and I always torque my locks the same as the lugs.

I have to get my winter tires/wheels on too ... nothing like doing it at the last minute while it's snowing.
 
H

Huck

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
60
0
0
Twin Cities
Dec 5, 2003
#6
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #6
These all sound in the ball park. I recall a general spec of 80 ft.-lbs., maybe up to 90 or 100 ft.-lbs., for aluminum wheels, and around 100-120 ft.-lbs. for steel wheels. 90 ought to be safe. I'd follow the pattern around at least twice at that torque, or until they no longer move after going through the rest of them.

Torqueing in stages would be a good idea also - go around and get them all finger tight, or "light-wrench" tight. Then go around and torque them all to 50 ft.-lbs., then go around again at 80 or 90 ft.-lbs., and follow them around at that same torque once more. If none of them moved further, you're done. If some of them (more than just 1) move some more, follow them around once more to make sure they're all up to the limit.

All that said...I frequently tighten them without a torque wrench...but it's a good idea that I SHOULD follow. Regardless, I give them several passes, cause tighten the others frequently effectively loosens the earlier ones.
 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven
Sep 7, 2001
7,702
0
0
New York
Dec 5, 2003
#7
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #7
I use a torque wrench and 95 seems to work fine for me. Just make sure you do it in the "star" pattern.
 
4

46gtsblown

Founding Member
Jan 9, 2002
278
0
0
Dec 5, 2003
#8
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #8
100 lbs ft. is standard for the 1/2" Ford studs/nuts.
It makes no difference if you're using steel or alloy wheels. With alloy wheels recheck the tq after a couple of days just to make sure. I have had them loosen on me and even lost a nut cause I forgot to re check them and yes I always use a tq wrench.

Dwayne
 
H

Huck

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
60
0
0
Twin Cities
Dec 5, 2003
#9
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #9
46gtsblown said:
It makes no difference if you're using steel or alloy wheels.
Dwayne
Click to expand...


Actually, you get less compression with steel, so you need more torque to ensure the nuts can't back off too easily. You also are more likely to gall, and plastically deform, the mating surface with an aluminum wheel, thus requiring slightly lower torques. You check most torque specs., and you will see higher specs for steel wheels and lower ones for aluminum. Don't say it isn't true just because you don't know yourself, or because you can kind of fudge your way around it.... On the other hand...your general advice isn't bad...and 100ft.-lbs. is kind of the cross over between the general specs. (It also varies, as your post implies, with stud diameter and thread.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
355
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
O
Help
  • OnisimusD
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
360
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 14, 2025
OnisimusD
O
J
Winter fuel additive
  • JJHstang
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
313
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
GOvert
G
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
854
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
521
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?