Mac H = Lose Torque?

[grey5.0beast]

Youre the idiot STUPID #UCK!

your contradicting yourself again, you just said that you didn't think i was an idiot, but look what you said here...
Senator Kerry, Is that you??

 

[grey5.0beast]

right. to "set things in motion". Think of a stock deisel. Tons of torque. Not very fast though. But they can "get moving" really quick.

ever driven a diesel... shutup


they don't have to rev high to get moving which is why most turbo diesels redline at around 4-5k

 

[1fastsn95]

i didn't start ****, you got in a big hissy fit b/c I corrected you.

no, not when you corrected me. Lets drop it and get back to the main question here. He will not lose a noticable amount of torque with an off road hpipe. Correct?

 

[grey5.0beast]

yes. and with the gears, he will even feel a slight increase in off the line performance.

 

[1fastsn95]

you punk make me shut up

 

[1fastsn95]

yes. and with the gears, he will even feel a slight increase in off the line performance.

Exactly!

 

[GTOreturns]

you punk make me shut up

*sniff*sniff* guys its the bant stick, RUN!!

 

[Synned]

Theres a method to the madness about keeping the stock h and headers on a stock 5.0. Its "Back Pressure". Because of the design of the heads the motor needs backpressure which makes the low end torque. OK, I would take 2 chambered flows over a straight through pipe because "of" the chambers.It adds more back pressure. Not to mention I had bullets with an off rd h with and without tail pipes. Loud? Oh yeah!! But it didnt sound like a 5.0 anymore! I had my E-7's worked on bt Thumper. THEN the stock h was choking the motor so I put a catted x pipe on and it free'd up some power!1

So buddy, you're telling all of these guys if we stuck a catless midpipe on a stock 5.0, it would actually be slower than one with the stock 4-cat midpipe?
Come on man...you hardly lose anything.

 

[GTOreturns]

So buddy, you're telling all of these guys if we stuck a catless midpipe on a stock 5.0, it would actually be slower than one with the stock 4-cat midpipe?
Come on man...you hardly lose anything.

Its noticable, down low, thats what I am saying.

 

[1fastsn95]

So buddy, you're telling all of these guys if we stuck a catless midpipe on a stock 5.0, it would actually be slower than one with the stock 4-cat midpipe?
Come on man...you hardly lose anything.

Thank you. My whole point.

 

[dastang2]

ok, O/R bassani x pipe, force proseries mufflers, long tubes and 3 inch tailpipes. it sounds awsome. thumper heads,fcam to go with it.

 

[grey5.0beast]

you punk make me shut up

damn your immature, how old are you?


But have you ever driven a diesel, if not then like i said before, don't talk about things you don't know bout.

 

[GTOreturns]

ok, O/R bassani x pipe, force proseries mufflers, long tubes and 3 inch tailpipes. it sounds awsome. thumper heads,fcam to go with it.

Is this a question?

 

[GTOreturns]

Thank you. My whole point.

your hole point is your not sure about things.

 

[1fastsn95]

damn your immature, how old are you?


But have you ever driven a diesel, if not then like i said before, don't talk about things you don't know bout.

yes I have. Not a semi. but a dodge truck. We have one where I work. It pulls hard. Thats torque. Right?

 

[1fastsn95]

your hole point is your not sure about things.

im sure your spelling sucks

 

[GTOreturns]

im sure yor speling sucks

View attachment 434022

 

[grey5.0beast]

im sure your spelling sucks

you are an idiot, I'm done(note the apostrophe between I and the m, hence I am...)

Oh btw you never answered how old you were, I am 16...

 

[1fastsn95]

31

 

[1fastsn95]

and youre the idiot. 16? Even got a permit yet? Hollar back when you get some experience under your belt