Mac Prochamber vs. X-pipe?

N

nick6704

New Member

Sep 7, 2004

47

0

0

Sep 28, 2004

#1

• Sep 28, 2004

• #1

I just bought an '04 GT and am getting ready to start with the usual mods, but I'm new to late model Stangs, and I was wondering if anyone could tell me the difference between an X-pipe and the MAC prochambers since they both seem to merge in the same fashion? Also, in addition to that if anyone has any opinions on the following exhaust setup, please share:

FR Shorty ceramic headers
MAC Prochamber
Borla Cat-back

Thanks

 

w00t

New Member

Mar 26, 2004

334

0

0

Arlington TX

Sep 28, 2004

#2

• Sep 28, 2004

• #2

Prochamber all the way!

 

w00t

New Member

Mar 26, 2004

334

0

0

Arlington TX

Sep 28, 2004

#3

• Sep 28, 2004

• #3

Check this out...

http://www.mustangexhaust.com/4.6sounds.htm

 

0

04ShadowGT

New Member

Jan 31, 2004

112

0

0

Elizabethtown, KY

Sep 28, 2004

#4

• Sep 28, 2004

• #4

I plan on getting Borla's Stinger soon to match the ProChamber I have. It's gonna sound sick!

 

Black2001GT

Founding Member

Feb 12, 2001

1,267

0

36

Saints fan Stuck in FalCANTs country

Sep 28, 2004

#5

• Sep 28, 2004

• #5

Man that Prochamber Sound is one in a million.

 

N

nick6704

New Member

Sep 7, 2004

47

0

0

Sep 28, 2004

#6

• Sep 28, 2004

• #6

Thanks for the input, you've made a Prochamber customer out of me!

 

Steve777

New Member

Jun 21, 2004

208

0

0

Pittsburgh, PA

Sep 28, 2004

#7

• Sep 28, 2004

• #7

Prochamber is significantly quieter than the X. It does have a nice deep sound, but I would take the howl of an X pipe over it any day.