Magnaflow xpipe & JBA Headers

01TrueBlueCobra

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
336
1
0
somewhere
One of my friends has a 98GT and he recently just got his Magnaflow X-pipe w/CATS and JBA Ceramic Headers part# 1625 JS. My question is will there be a fitment problem with the 2 and does anyone out there have these same mods on their 98GT.Second question will it be easier to install the headers with the xpipe already installed or should I have the headers installed first.
 
SVTStang03 said:
Off topic but why would you buy all 3 Steeda G-Track Setups? The stage 3 has everything that the stage 1 and 2 have plus more. :confused:


If you go into the Steeda website you will see under suspension that the IRS G-TRAC is broken up into 3 stages so you can get them one at a time if you can't afford all 3 at the same time.
 
MustangLife said:
Just curious but how are you dynoing 332 rwhp with a 01 cobra with only Complete WMS HighVelocity Intake System, JBA Headers, Bassani Xpipe, Magnaflow Catback, Steeda Underdrive Pullies


I've had a lot of people doughting my horsepower numbers, but if you go into the SVT forum I have my dynosheet posted. Also the WMS kit included a 95mm MAF incase you didn't know that.One more thing my friend 98LaserGT can confirm those numbers
 
My friend with a 01 cobra with a magnaflow cat-back, off-road x-pipe (not sure what brand) ported maf meter, cold air intake, steeda pulleys and a dynotune by jerry at fordchip is only seeing 292rwhp. Only difference is he doesn't have headers.

Josh
 
MustangLife said:
My friend with a 01 cobra with a magnaflow cat-back, off-road x-pipe (not sure what brand) ported maf meter, cold air intake, steeda pulleys and a dynotune by jerry at fordchip is only seeing 292rwhp. Only difference is he doesn't have headers.

Josh


The Dyno sheet I have posted on this thread doesn't Lie. Your friend should get a 95mm MAF from WMS.
 
Long Tube Headers are a complete waste of money on a 2valve car thats not blown. jba's are the only way or just keep the factory headers. Labor on long tubes is like $500 plus $400-$700 for the long tubes themselves. And get lets say 5 rwhp out of them.

Just my 2 cents

Also There 8 million people on this board that have long tubes with the same mods as me with equal or less hp and I'm in still on the stock headers.

Josh
 
NasaGT said:
9-10 rwhp is a litlle more realistic for the JBA shorties on a 2v N/A. I've seen several dynos that all fall in that range. Never seen more than that.

Were these dynoes on 2V cars? NA, 2v cars? Can anyone post a picture of a dyno showing these 9-10 hp gains on 2v, NA cars? Were the gains up high (> 4000 rpm) or down low?

Jeff
 
MustangLife said:
Long Tube Headers are a complete waste of money on a 2valve car thats not blown. jba's are the only way or just keep the factory headers. Labor on long tubes is like $500 plus $400-$700 for the long tubes themselves. And get lets say 5 rwhp out of them.

Just my 2 cents


Josh

I just started a heated thread about shorties v. LTs at modular depot. There doesn't seem to be any consensus.

Jeff
 
MustangLife said:
Long Tube Headers are a complete waste of money on a 2valve car thats not blown. jba's are the only way or just keep the factory headers. Labor on long tubes is like $500 plus $400-$700 for the long tubes themselves. And get lets say 5 rwhp out of them.

Just my 2 cents

Also There 8 million people on this board that have long tubes with the same mods as me with equal or less hp and I'm in still on the stock headers.

Josh
are you still posting this retarded bs?