I'm hoping it does good! Anyone ever have any issues with remanufactured ones?Nice! That sensor should drop into the 70mm housing you already have, and work perfect with your setup.
I'm hoping it does good! Anyone ever have any issues with remanufactured ones?Nice! That sensor should drop into the 70mm housing you already have, and work perfect with your setup.
Swapping the MAF sensors between different MAFs is a big no no. The MAF body and sensor are designed to match each other. Therefore you can't swap sensors between different part number MAF bodies and maintain proper calibration. The assembly is designed to match the computer’s internal program, and swapping a different MAF can upset the computer's calibration. In other words, your monster MAF probably won't match the calibration of your 5.0 Mustang computer.
.
Soon as the weather clears up some here I'm going to try the F2xxx sensor in the 70mm housing and see how it does.I agree with you except the two 70mm housings we are discussing appear to be identical other than the mounting interface (flange vs coupling). Given the assumption that they do feature identical internal designs, they it would theoretically be able to swap the electronics between the two.
Of course, this would require testing to conform to see if the output of a SN95 factory MAF is the same as if the F2 electronics were swapped over to the courgar/tbird housing. Pending that testing...it's all a theory.
No testing needed...Of course, this would require testing to conform to see if the output of a SN95 factory MAF is the same as if the F2 electronics were swapped over to the courgar/tbird housing. Pending that testing...it's all a theory.
No testing needed...
The MAF Transfer for a stock Fox A9* ecu'd, 55mm housing/sensor, is nearly identical to the MAF Transfer for a 70mm housing and F2VF sensor.
So close that it is well within the ability of the ecu to correct, and for all intents and purposes, identical.
This means that, for a given unit of airflow, the voltage output of both meters is the same. The computer can't tell the 2 meters apart.
The most common mixup is using the wrong sensor on the 70mm housing...
Somewhere on this board, there are threads here that contain either spreadsheets or images of graphs that compare the MAF Transfers of these meters.
It was years ago though, lol
Yes it's a slip fit style.You should be able to install the F2VF sensor in the 70mm housing that you had originally, it was the slip fit style not the flange style, right?
So as for the 1st one which is now calibrated for 60s he did send it back for recal since he orig went with 42lb, states he had one the car for about 200 miles or so, got it tuned, went to strip and did 3 or so passes and his tranny gave out and was leaking. Sent me his proof or recal. And some pics. The deal is pretty good to me at 125. I’d pass on injectors just bc I think I’d get those new even though his seem ok but wants 250. Unless I can bundle. The second one I put up the 80 for 30 looks clean but I would have to send back, he wants 300 for that one and at that point I’m in a loss bc I’m sure recal is about 100 bucks. So you would go for this one at 125?I'd do it, you could call pro m with the serial number to confirm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?