• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

more HP from bigger MAF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxfan88
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 3, 2006
#21
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #21
Marlboro_Man said:
Carving?
Click to expand...
Either he eats a lot of meat or he is into the twisties.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jan 3, 2006
#22
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #22
Mavrick said:
Nope, not at all.. i've been on the lookout for a cheap one myself - unfortunetly I havn't run into one yet.
Click to expand...

I just got a 70mm off of eBay for $26 plus shipping. $40 total. Add in $11 for the adapter and I'm paying a total of 51 bucks to upgrade from a 55mm to a 70mm. Not a bad deal in my mind.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 3, 2006
#23
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #23
A C&L has it's own calibrations aside from stock. Also, it seems some of you don't believe magazine numbers, but I'll post it anyways. MM&FF back in 02 picked up a solid 10hp/10lbs-trq. at the wheels all across the rev range when the switched from a 77mm Pro-M to a 76mm C&L.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Jan 3, 2006
#24
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #24
I would not make any buying decision on 1 article from a magazine. I make my decisions over years of trying and researching to come up with a decision.

The best MAF I have used was an 80mm Pro-M plastic unit.

I even picked up on my stock motor with 19 lb injectors.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 3, 2006
#25
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #25
04sleeper said:
The best MAF I have used was an 80mm Pro-M plastic unit.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to disagree. A Professional Mass Air flow (Pro-m's new name) sensor is the way to go. But it's $100.00 to get it recalibrated so here is how I looked at it:

New C&L $130.00 - $160.00 on eBay for 19# Injectors + $30 for recal = 190.
New Pro-M $230-ish from their website for 19# Injectors + $100 for recal = 330.

Buying this used sensor on ebay for $50.00 already calibrated for 19# will save me about $50.00.
In the long run I will end up with a Pro-M 80mm calibrated for 30# injectors (hooked up to a small S/C) and I didn't think I wanted to pay for the recalibration.

My idea = 50+230=280-330= net savings of $50.00.... Plus in the end, i can resell the meter I bought increasing the savings to put towards more mods.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Jan 3, 2006
#26
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #26
Pro-M used to have a chart on their old website that showed the stock 55mm meter capable of flowing enough air for 320 FWHP na.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Jan 3, 2006
#27
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #27
04sleeper said:
The best MAF I have used was an 80mm Pro-M unit.

.
Click to expand...


only way to go buy it once and be done, when the time come you need it of course
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 3, 2006
#28
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #28
8950HO said:
Pro-M used to have a chart on their old website that showed the stock 55mm meter capable of flowing enough air for 320 FWHP na.
Click to expand...

E7s can support 340hp. What's the point?
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 3, 2006
#29
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #29
IntenseBlue said:
E7s can support 340hp. What's the point?
Click to expand...

I guess what I'm trying to say is that just because they can support it, that doesn't mean they're not a restriction.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Jan 3, 2006
#30
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #30
94-95 maf instead of the 55mm
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Jan 3, 2006
#31
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #31
DO NOT believe those articles on C&L's, they've been tested a few times, at dyno's all local in NJ. The more you contribute, the better the articles written about you. I've known cars in magazines where they quote dyno numbers, and the cars haven't even been driven yet, or how bout a car that was wrecked on a Road Race track, and they only shot one side.

You can call almost any big name shop, and they will tell you not to use a C&L.
Sometimes they do work out, but the odds are against you.

Big deal, $100 for the calibration.
And if that's your worry, when it's time to upgrade because of injectors, sell the current meter on ebay, and buy the identical used with the right calibration. I've done this and lost zero dollars.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 3, 2006
#32
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #32
Like I said before... I don't disagree. Pro-M would be the best choice for a new Sensor.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Jan 3, 2006
#33
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #33
IntenseBlue said:
E7s can support 340hp. What's the point?
Click to expand...

Just posted for reference,regarding the 55mm meter.

E7`s supporting 340hp.Can you clarify this some more?I`ve read more than a few articles saying that stock un ported E7`s will max out around 300 fwhp/na.

Do you mean stock or ported E7`s?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 3, 2006
#34
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #34
Mike's (Thumper's) website should have tons of flow info on the truck heads.
 

5.0fox

Member
Feb 10, 2003
410
0
17
buckley/enumclaw wa
Jan 3, 2006
#35
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #35
well foxfan ive read alot of your post and i know your young and on a budget. i dont think you will be building a very wild combo any time soon so i think a 73 mm c+l would work out good for you. i got a very good deal on one and i fealt a very good difference when i installed it. to give you an idea of the gain it was equal to say underdrive pulleys or an h-pipe.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Jan 3, 2006
#36
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #36
c&l = waste of money
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Jan 3, 2006
#37
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #37
IntenseBlue said:
A C&L has it's own calibrations aside from stock. Also, it seems some of you don't believe magazine numbers, but I'll post it anyways. MM&FF back in 02 picked up a solid 10hp/10lbs-trq. at the wheels all across the rev range when the switched from a 77mm Pro-M to a 76mm C&L.
Click to expand...
I had a C&L then switched to Pro m.At full throttle it ran great;it was just the other 99.9% of the time that it drove like crap.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jan 3, 2006
#38
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #38
legalize420 said:
c&l = waste of money
Click to expand...
This is an unfair statement. You're welcome to your opinion, but making this statement as though it is based on fact is ignorant. I personnally ran a C&L 73mm for over two years with absolutely no problems, and I know dozens of people in my area who can say the same- none of which were ever featured in magazines. I now use a ProM, but it has nothing to do with my satisfaction level with the C&L. It is no more "a waste of money" than any other brand. Whether or not it works well for you has a lot more to do with what you know (or don't) than in the part you use.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 3, 2006
#39
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #39
8950HO said:
Just posted for reference,regarding the 55mm meter.

E7`s supporting 340hp.Can you clarify this some more?I`ve read more than a few articles saying that stock un ported E7`s will max out around 300 fwhp/na.

Do you mean stock or ported E7`s?
Click to expand...

Stock E7s. They can SUPPORT 340hp due to a simple airflow formula:
.257xCFMx#of cylinders. They may max around 300fwhp on a 302ci motor. That doesn't mean they'll max out at 300whp on say a stroker or 351, etc. They've made more than that unported, but it's a formula. It's close, but not dead on.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Jan 3, 2006
#40
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #40
When it all comes down to it for building a nice strong combo in MY OPINION I would go with the Pro-M meter. BTW what does a SCT meter mean? My friends got one on his 500+rwhp notch, is it just another name like Pro-m and C&L or does it mean you can recalibrate with a tuner or something?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
547
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
859
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
264
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
383
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
S
CHANGING BRAKE PADS
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
377
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 12, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?