Either he eats a lot of meat or he is into the twisties.Marlboro_Man said:Carving?
Either he eats a lot of meat or he is into the twisties.Marlboro_Man said:Carving?
Mavrick said:Nope, not at all.. i've been on the lookout for a cheap one myself - unfortunetly I havn't run into one yet.
04sleeper said:The best MAF I have used was an 80mm Pro-M plastic unit.
04sleeper said:The best MAF I have used was an 80mm Pro-M unit.
.
8950HO said:Pro-M used to have a chart on their old website that showed the stock 55mm meter capable of flowing enough air for 320 FWHP na.
IntenseBlue said:E7s can support 340hp. What's the point?
IntenseBlue said:E7s can support 340hp. What's the point?
I had a C&L then switched to Pro m.At full throttle it ran great;it was just the other 99.9% of the time that it drove like crap.IntenseBlue said:A C&L has it's own calibrations aside from stock. Also, it seems some of you don't believe magazine numbers, but I'll post it anyways. MM&FF back in 02 picked up a solid 10hp/10lbs-trq. at the wheels all across the rev range when the switched from a 77mm Pro-M to a 76mm C&L.
This is an unfair statement. You're welcome to your opinion, but making this statement as though it is based on fact is ignorant. I personnally ran a C&L 73mm for over two years with absolutely no problems, and I know dozens of people in my area who can say the same- none of which were ever featured in magazines. I now use a ProM, but it has nothing to do with my satisfaction level with the C&L. It is no more "a waste of money" than any other brand. Whether or not it works well for you has a lot more to do with what you know (or don't) than in the part you use.legalize420 said:c&l = waste of money
8950HO said:Just posted for reference,regarding the 55mm meter.
E7`s supporting 340hp.Can you clarify this some more?I`ve read more than a few articles saying that stock un ported E7`s will max out around 300 fwhp/na.
Do you mean stock or ported E7`s?