• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

More newb questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter DageonYar
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2005

DageonYar

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
48
0
0
Jun 24, 2005
#1
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #1
I hate to sound so noobish... but searching this site for explanations is making me dizzy... What exactly am I driving!? lol... I read PI/NPI N/A etc etc etc... rwhp, rwt blower this and turbo that lol... man, I need to learn about my car...

All I know, it's a 5spd standard, 4.6L (281) V8. Some links to techsplanations would be great. 0-60 times... 1/4... etc. It's stock for now. I'll be saving up to gear it to 3.73's or 3.90's soon... but I need more input

Cheers -
 

RedBullitt

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
462
0
0
Morgantown WV
Jun 25, 2005
#2
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #2
welcome to the site,

the 96-98s were non pi (non performance improved, meaning they have diff cams heads and intake etc than the 99-04 cars) and are Naturally aspirated (NA, meaning no blower aka FI, forced induction) they made less Horse power and torque than the newer ones because of the intake, cam, and heads, tune etc.
Rwhp is the amount of horsepower that acctually makes it to the wheels through the drivetrain (power loss), engine horsepower is how much power you are making in the engine alone before drivetrain loss.the same goes with torque at the engine and rear wheel torque. as to those gears, look into 4.10s, on the highway cruising at 75 in an auto you run around 2800 rpm.
 

RedBullitt

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
462
0
0
Morgantown WV
Jun 25, 2005
#3
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #3
oh, you have a manual, you will turn slightly lower rpms than the auto becuase your transmission is geared different. you should also look into a short shifter, like the mgw, it is very nice, you cant go wrong with it.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Jun 25, 2005
#4
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #4
A blower refers to a supercharger...basically that's what it does...blows/forces air into the intake to increase horsepower. Turbochargers are also a power adder but they basically suck air through the engine via exhuast.

Your car being a 2004 means it already has PI heads/intake/cams. The NPI cars were built from 96-98 and is also the first years of the 4.6L engine. Before 96 they were 5.0L.

You have a convertable and it is a little heavier than the coupe. On a good day you should see low 14's to high 13's in your car as is. Somebody with a vert chn chime in and verify.

As far as gears 4.10's work well in an auto BUT you will need a tune to correct shift points and speedometer. This is accomplished by either "flashing" or programing the computer for the modifications or by way of a separate programable chip that is inserted into the computer (ECU).
 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
Jun 25, 2005
#5
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #5
coramprat said:
Turbochargers are also a power adder but they basically suck air through the engine via exhuast.
Click to expand...


Isnt it more like exhaust gases spin a turbine, the spinning of that turbine forces air into the intake manifold which produces boost, which increases power.

whereas a supercharger uses a belt to spin a pulley which spins the turbine that forces air into the intake manifold which produces boost, etc etc.

Supercharger = turbine spins at lower RPM's and uses a belt instead of exhaust gases, gives power instantly

Turbocharger = turbine spins at higher RPM's (100k+ rms, gives the whistling noise of a turbo aka spooling) and gives power towards the middle and higher engine rpms (2500-6000rpms) because the first 2500rpms its spooling up to produce the boost.

Both do the same thing, just use a different means to get there.
 

DageonYar

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
48
0
0
Jun 25, 2005
#6
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #6
Thanks guys This is a great start! Was just recently I found out what the heck a ricer is lmao... Glad to see those annoying Civic guys got a name lol.

I read up on the site posted in the FAQ's about installing the short shifter, seems simple enough. Does it make a big difference?
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 25, 2005
#7
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #7
a short throw shifter makes a HUGE difference.. the reason why is that your stock shifter is not only longer (has long shifts) but it also has a huge piece of rubber between the shift handle and the actual shifter. This rubber is there to reduce tranny noises but it makes your shifting feel all flimsy. My Steeda Tri-Ax has no rubber piece there
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Jun 25, 2005
#8
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #8
DageonYar said:
Thanks guys This is a great start! Was just recently I found out what the heck a ricer is lmao... Glad to see those annoying Civic guys got a name lol.

I read up on the site posted in the FAQ's about installing the short shifter, seems simple enough. Does it make a big difference?
Click to expand...


welcome to the boards! nice car
 
C

cooter_11

Member
Apr 22, 2005
138
0
16
GA
Jun 25, 2005
#9
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #9
welcome aboard buddy!
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Jun 25, 2005
#10
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #10
Dusstbuster said:
Isnt it more like exhaust gases spin a turbine, the spinning of that turbine forces air into the intake manifold which produces boost, which increases power.
Click to expand...
Sucks...

whereas a supercharger uses a belt to spin a pulley which spins the turbine that forces air into the intake manifold which produces boost, etc etc.
Click to expand...
Blows...

Basically...
 

'13_ImpactBlue_GT

Angry Little Elf
Mar 30, 2005
872
2
98
Where the men are men and the sheep are nervous
Jun 25, 2005
#11
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • #11
Welcome aboard!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
695
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Progress Thread 1993 LX Hatch Progress
  • Mac131
  • Aug 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
210
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
Mac131
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
T
2004 SN95 W/ 3.9L Swap or turbo question
  • ThePIFFProject
  • Jun 11, 2022
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
666
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2022
ThePIFFProject
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?